Mental and physical strain at VDT workstations

Abstract. Abstract. There are millions of workers worldwide who use video display terminals (VDTs) on a daily basis. Over the past decade VDT users have reported a variety of health complaints that have been associated with VDTs including visual and musculoskeletal discomfort and psychological distress. In addition VDT users have expressed fears about radiation from VDTs and more recently concerns about adverse reproductive effects. This paper explores the potential health effects of working at a VDT based on an evaluation of current research literature and indicates where more research is underway or needed to better define health risks. Some conclusions about the seriousness of potential health effects are presented.

[1]  Pregnancy and VDT work—an evaluation of the state of the art , 1987 .

[2]  M Feinleib,et al.  Women, work and coronary heart disease: prospective findings from the Framingham heart study. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[3]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Doing the Same Work with Hard Copy and with Cathode-Ray Tube (CRT) Computer Terminals , 1984 .

[4]  John R. Wilson Video displays, work and vision: National Research Council, 1983. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, pp 273 + xiii. US $14.50 (paperback). , 1985 .

[5]  E Grandjean,et al.  VDT Workstation Design: Preferred Settings and Their Effects , 1983, Human factors.

[6]  K. Haglid,et al.  Astrogliosis in the cerebral cortex of gerbils after long-term exposure to 1,1,1-trichloroethane. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  Birth defect, spontaneous abortion and work with VDUs , 1987 .

[8]  G. Bammer VDUs and musculo-skeletal problems at the Australian National University. A case study , 1987 .

[9]  B Jonsson,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of local muscular strain in the shoulder during constrained work. , 1982, Journal of human ergology.

[10]  L. Saxén,et al.  Birth defects and exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy. A Finnish case-referent study. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[11]  B. Knave,et al.  Work with video display terminals among office employees. I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  B. A. Rupp,et al.  Display image characteristics and visual response , 1987 .

[13]  E Gunnarsson,et al.  Eye strain resulting from VDT work at the Swedish telecommunications administration. , 1983, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Andrea Lorenz Hartmann,et al.  VDT Operator Pupil Diameter Changes, Accommodation Changes and Subjective Comfort/Discomfort Score Changes over a Working Day , 1985 .

[15]  William E. Murray,et al.  Potential Health Hazards of Video Display Terminals. , 1981 .

[16]  Mark R. Harrison Fraco Visual display units. , 1983 .

[17]  Weiss Mm The video display terminals. Is there a radiation hazard , 1983 .

[18]  R Arndt,et al.  Working posture and musculoskeletal problems of video display terminal operators--review and reappraisal. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  Starr Sj A study of video display terminal workers. , 1983 .

[20]  Monica Sandström,et al.  Effects of weak pulsed magnetic fields on chick embryogenesis , 1987 .

[21]  Marvin J. Dainoff,et al.  Occupational stress factors in visual display terminal (VDT) operation: a review of empirical research† , 1982 .

[22]  Sudhakar L. Rangarajulu,et al.  Video Display Operator's Eye Scanning, Comfort/Discomfort and Performance in a Hard Copy - Screen and a Split Screen Data Presentation , 1984 .

[23]  William E. Murray Video Display Terminals: Radiation Issues , 1984, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  A. W. Guy Health hazards assessment of radio frequency electromagnetic fields emitted by video display terminals , 1987 .

[25]  Etienne Grandjean,et al.  A laboratory study on preferred and imposed settings of a VDT workstation , 1982 .

[26]  J L Monteagudo,et al.  Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. , 1982, Journal of anatomy.

[27]  B. Frankenhaeuser Video display terminals—electromagnetic radiation and health , 1987 .

[28]  V. Hopkin Book reviewErgonomic aspects of visual display terminals: Edited by E. Grandjean, E. Vigliani Taylor and Francis Ltd, 1980, pp x + 300, £18 , 1981 .

[29]  G. Németh,et al.  Effects of changes in sitting work posture on static neck and shoulder muscle activity. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[30]  A. Happ,et al.  An Investigation of Health Complaints and Job Stress in Video Display Operations , 1981, Human factors.

[31]  Pregnancy outcome and VDU-work in a cohort of insurance clerks , 1987 .

[32]  Toshisada Nishida,et al.  Natural history of a tool-using behavior by wild chimpanzees in feeding upon wood-boring ants , 1982 .

[33]  B. Uo,et al.  Video display terminals and health. A technical and medical appraisal of the state of the art. , 1984 .

[34]  W Halperin,et al.  Correlates of Ocular and Somatic Symptoms among Video Display Terminal Users , 1984, Human Factors.

[35]  B. Tribukait,et al.  Effects of pulsed magnetic fields on embryonic development in mice , 1987 .

[36]  Steven J. Shute,et al.  Effects of Video Display Terminals on Telephone Operators , 1982, Human factors.

[37]  G K Lemasters,et al.  Use of exposure data in occupational reproductive studies. , 1984, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[38]  O Ostberg CRTs pose health problems for operators. , 1975, The International journal of occupational health & safety.