Assessment of a large watershed in Brazil using Emergy Evaluation and Geographical Information System

Abstract Humanity's future depends on the preservation of natural ecosystems that supply resources and absorb pollutants. Rural and urban productions are currently based on chemical products made from petroleum, which are responsible for high negative impacts on the Biosphere. In order to prevent those impacts, efficient public policies seeking for sustainable development are necessary. Aiming to assess the load on the environment (considering the gratuitous contributions of natural systems—a donor's perspective) due to human-dominated process, a scientific tool called Emergy Evaluation has been applied in different production systems, including crops and farms. However, there is still a lack of emergy studies in the context of watersheds, probably due to the difficulty of collecting raw data. The present work aims to carry out an assessment of Mogi-Guacu and Pardo watershed, through the combined use of Emergy Evaluation and Geographical Information System. The agricultural and natural land uses were considered, while urban areas were excluded. Emergy flows (expressed in seJ ha −1  yr −1 ) obtained for all agricultural and natural land uses were expanded for the whole watershed and the emergy indices were calculated. The results show that the watershed has: low renewability (% R  = 32%); low capture of natural resources through high external economic investment (EYR = 1.86); low dependence on natural resources (EIR = 1.16); and moderate load on the environment (ELR = 2.08). Considering a scenario where sugar-cane crops, orchards and pasture areas are converted from conventional to organic management, watershed's emergy performance improved, reaching a new renewability of 38%, but it is still not enough to be considered sustainable.

[1]  Tim Lang,et al.  Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket , 2005 .

[2]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  An emergy evaluation of complexity, information and technology, towards maximum power and zero emissions , 2007 .

[3]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Dynamic emergy accounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropical wetland stormwater management systems , 2006 .

[4]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[5]  D. Tilley,et al.  EMERGY-based environmental systems assessment of a multi-purpose temperate mixed-forest watershed of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  C. Hall,et al.  Revisiting the Limits to Growth After Peak Oil : In the 1970s a rising world population and the finite resources available to support it were hot topics. Interest faded-but it's time to take another look , 2009 .

[7]  Marcia Pimentel,et al.  Food, Energy, and Society , 1979 .

[8]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  Stream order, hierarchy, and energy convergence of land use , 2007 .

[9]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability assessment of a farm in the Chianti area (Italy) , 2001 .

[10]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[11]  Charles Francis,et al.  Plan B 2.0: Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble , 2006 .

[12]  Torbjörn Rydberg,et al.  Emergy evaluation on the production, processing and export of coffee in Nicaragua , 2006 .

[13]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil , 2006 .

[14]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[15]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems , 2006 .

[16]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Systems ecology : an introduction , 1984 .

[17]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Brazilian Soybean Production: Emergy Analysis With an Expanded Scope , 2005 .

[18]  J. Laherrère,et al.  The End of Cheap Oil , 1998 .

[19]  J. Reganold,et al.  Sustainability of three apple production systems , 2001, Nature.

[20]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  A Prosperous Way Down: Principles And Policies , 2001 .

[21]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  A combined tool for environmental scientists and decision makers: ternary diagrams and emergy accounting , 2006 .

[22]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[23]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Application of ecological engineering principles in agriculture , 1996 .

[24]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Overcoming the inadequacy of single-criterion approaches to Life Cycle Assessment , 2006 .

[25]  Mathis Wackernagel,et al.  Natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept , 1999 .

[26]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  A picture is worth a thousand words: energy systems language and simulation , 2004 .

[27]  A. J. Lotka.  Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Emergy, nutrients balance, and economic assessment of soybean production and industrialization in Brazil , 2009 .

[29]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  The use of emergy assessment and the Geographical Information System in the diagnosis of small family farms in Brazil , 2008 .

[30]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  The solar transformity of oil and petroleum natural gas , 2005 .

[31]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[32]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy and ecosystem complexity , 2009 .

[33]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[34]  M. Borowitzka.  Limits to Growth , 1998 .