A tolerance interval approach for assessment of agreement in method comparison studies with repeated measurements

Abstract This paper generalizes the tolerance interval approach for assessing agreement between two methods of continuous measurement for repeated measurement data—a common scenario in applications. The repeated measurements may be longitudinal or they may be replicates of the same underlying measurement. Our approach is to first model the data using a mixed model and then construct a relevant asymptotic tolerance interval (or band) for the distribution of appropriately defined differences. We present the methodology in the general context of a mixed model that can incorporate covariates, heteroscedasticity and serial correlation in the errors. Simulation for the no-covariate case shows good small-sample performance of the proposed methodology. For the longitudinal data, we also describe an extension for the case when the observed time profiles are modelled nonparametrically through penalized splines. Two real data applications are presented.

[1]  S Kumanyika,et al.  A weighted concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measurement designs. , 1996, Biometrics.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[3]  Debashis Kushary,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[4]  J. Fleiss.  The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[5]  B. Ripley,et al.  Semiparametric Regression: Preface , 2003 .

[6]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[7]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Pankaj K. Choudhary,et al.  Tests for assessment of agreement using probability criteria , 2007 .

[9]  P. Diggle.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[10]  H. Barnhart,et al.  Modeling Concordance Correlation via GEE to Evaluate Reproducibility , 2001, Biometrics.

[11]  L. Lin,et al.  Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Pankaj K. Choudhary,et al.  Measuring Agreement in Method Comparison Studies — A Review , 2005 .

[13]  Douglas M Hawkins,et al.  Diagnostics for conformity of paired quantitative measurements , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan,et al.  Advances in Ranking and Selection, Multiple Comparisons, and Reliability: Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[16]  P. Choudhary,et al.  Assessment of Agreement under Nonstandard Conditions Using Regression Models for Mean and Variance , 2006, Biometrics.

[17]  G Dunn,et al.  Modelling method comparison data , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .