Fairy Tales versus Facts: Genre Matters to the Developing Brain.

Neurobiological studies of discourse comprehension have almost exclusively focused on narrative comprehension. However, successful engagement in modern society, particularly in educational settings, also requires comprehension with an aim to learn new information (i.e., "expository comprehension"). Despite its prevalence, no studies to date have neurobiologically characterized expository comprehension as compared with narrative. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging in typically developing children to test whether different genres require specialized brain networks. In addition to expected activations in language and comprehension areas in the default mode network (DMN), expository comprehension required significantly greater activation in the frontoparietal control network (FPN) than narrative comprehension, and relied significantly less on posterior regions in the DMN. Functional connectivity analysis revealed that, compared with narrative, the FPN robustly correlated with the DMN, and this inter-network communication was higher with increased reading expertise. These findings suggest that, relative to narrative comprehension, expository comprehension shows (1) a unique configuration of the DMN, potentially to support non-social comprehension processes, and (2) increased utilization of top-down regions to help support goal-directed comprehension processes in the DMN. More generally, our findings reveal that different types of discourse-level comprehension place diverse neural demands on the developing brain.

[1]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge , 2011 .

[2]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The extended language network: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[3]  S. Petrill,et al.  Comprehending text versus reading words in young readers with varying reading ability: distinct patterns of functional connectivity from common processing hubs. , 2016, Developmental science.

[4]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False-Positive Rates Redux , 2017, Brain Connect..

[5]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Using Texts in Science Education: Cognitive Processes and Knowledge Representation , 2010 .

[6]  Karl Haberlandt,et al.  Story grammar and reading time of story constituents , 1980 .

[7]  M. Seghier The Angular Gyrus , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[8]  N. Stein,et al.  An Analysis of Story Comprehension in Elementary School Children: A Test of a Schema. , 1975 .

[9]  Stephen A. Petrill,et al.  Comprehending expository texts: the dynamic neurobiological correlates of building a coherent text representation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[11]  Zinar The Relative Contributions of Word Identification Skill and Comprehension-Monitoring Behavior to Reading Comprehension Ability. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[12]  George Kamberelis,et al.  Cultural Artifacts as Scaffolds for Genre Development , 1999 .

[13]  Timothy Shanahan,et al.  Common Core State Standards: A New Role for Writing. , 2015 .

[14]  Ruth Seurinck,et al.  Power and sample size calculations for fMRI studies based on the prevalence of active peaks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[15]  Robert F. Lorch,et al.  The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[16]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Laurie E Cutting,et al.  Reader-Text Interactions: How Differential Text and Question Types Influence Cognitive Skills Needed for Reading Comprehension. , 2012, Journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[19]  R. Mar The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  K Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  P. Broek,et al.  A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties , 2014 .

[22]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[23]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[24]  Laurie E Cutting,et al.  The Contribution of Executive Skills to Reading Comprehension , 2009, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[25]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  Prior Knowledge and Its Relationship to Comprehension , 1981 .

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[27]  E. Maguire,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  D. Wechsler Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence--Second Edition , 2018 .

[29]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional Organization of Social Perception and Cognition in the Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Mayer Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction , 1996 .

[32]  Randy G. Floyd,et al.  Differential Competencies Contributing to Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts , 2008 .

[33]  R. Saxe,et al.  Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Michael F. Bonner,et al.  Converging Evidence for the Neuroanatomic Basis of Combinatorial Semantics in the Angular Gyrus , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  P. van den Broek,et al.  Using Texts in Science Education: Cognitive Processes and Knowledge Representation , 2010, Science.

[36]  Kathy D. Gerlach,et al.  Future planning: default network activity couples with frontoparietal control network and reward-processing regions during process and outcome simulations. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[37]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[38]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition , 2010, NeuroImage.

[39]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events , 1985 .

[40]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring, memory, and study strategies of Good and Poor Readers , 1981 .

[41]  Laurie E. Cutting,et al.  Prefrontal mediation of the reading network predicts intervention response in dyslexia , 2018, Cortex.

[42]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Cortical systems for local and global integration in discourse comprehension , 2013, NeuroImage.

[43]  R. Ptak The Frontoparietal Attention Network of the Human Brain , 2012, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[44]  R. Mar The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[46]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  The Frontoparietal Control System , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[47]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix , 2011 .

[48]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Awareness of Text Structure in Recognition and Production of Expository Discourse , 1983 .

[49]  P. van den Broek,et al.  Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[50]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Janice Chen,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension , 2016, Nature Communications.

[52]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[53]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Readers select a comprehension mode independent of pronoun: Evidence from fMRI during narrative comprehension , 2017, Brain and Language.

[54]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[55]  R. Giora Language comprehension as structure building , 1996 .

[56]  P. Broek,et al.  Coherence monitoring by good and poor comprehenders in elementary school: Comparing offline and online measures , 2016 .

[57]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Exploring the role of the posterior middle temporal gyrus in semantic cognition: Integration of anterior temporal lobe with executive processes , 2016, NeuroImage.

[58]  P. Broek,et al.  The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. , 1999 .

[59]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions , 1985 .

[60]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  Discourse-level comprehension engages medial frontal Theory of Mind brain regions even for expository texts , 2018, Language, cognition and neuroscience.