Pediatric head and neck lesions: assessment of vascularity by MR digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Pediatric head and neck lesions can be difficult to characterize on clinical grounds alone. We investigated the use of dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography as a noninvasive adjunct for the assessment of the vascularity of these abnormalities. METHODS Twelve patients (age range, 2 days to 16 years) with known or suspected vascular abnormalities were studied. Routine MR imaging, time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR digital subtraction angiography were performed in all patients. The dynamic sequence was acquired in two planes at one frame per second by using a thick section (6-10 cm) selective radio-frequency spoiled fast gradient-echo sequence and an IV administered bolus of contrast material. The images were subtracted from a preliminary mask sequence and viewed as a video-inverted cine loop. RESULTS In all cases, MR digital subtraction angiography was successfully performed. The technique showed the following: 1) slow flow lesions (two choroidal angiomas, eyelid hemangioma, and scalp venous malformation); 2) high flow lesions that were not always suspected by clinical examination alone (parotid hemangioma, scalp, occipital, and eyelid arteriovenous malformations plus a palatal teratoma); 3) a hypovascular tumor for which a biopsy could be safely performed (Burkitt lymphoma); and 4) a hypervascular tumor of the palate (cystic teratoma). CONCLUSION Our early experience suggests that MR digital subtraction angiography can be reliably performed in children of all ages without complication. The technique provided a noninvasive assessment of the vascularity of each lesion that could not always have been predicted on the basis of clinical examination or routine MR imaging alone.

[1]  J. Klisch,et al.  Head and neck vascular malformations: time-resolved MR projection angiography , 2003, Neuroradiology.

[2]  J. Bloem,et al.  Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in diagnosing and classifying peripheral vascular malformations. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  P. Griffiths,et al.  Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Comparison of Novel Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Techniques and Conventional Catheter Angiography , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[5]  J. Werner,et al.  Current concepts in the classification, diagnosis and treatment of hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[6]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  M. Hori,et al.  MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  K. Tsuchiya,et al.  MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  J Hennig,et al.  Fast functional MRA using time‐resolved projection MR angiography with correlation analysis , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R. Strecker,et al.  Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations , 2000, Neuroradiology.

[12]  A. Seccia,et al.  Combined radiological and surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations of the head and neck. , 1999, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Sclerotherapy of craniofacial venous malformations: complications and results. , 1999, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Arteriovenous Malformations of the Head and Neck: Natural History and Management , 1998, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[15]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Time‐resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  D. L. Johnston,et al.  Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  W. Dillon,et al.  Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck: MR characterization. , 1993, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  O. Abe,et al.  Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[19]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Preliminary experience with dynamic MR projection angiography in the evaluation of cervicocranial steno-occlusive disease , 2001, European Radiology.

[20]  M. Hori,et al.  Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases , 2000, European Radiology.