Pre-cuing Target Location Reduces Interference but Not Negative Priming from Visual Distractors

Research on visual selective attention has shown that processing of distractors can produce (1) interference with response to a concurrent target, and (2) negative priming of response to a subsequent target. These results support late-selection accounts of attention. However, recent findings demonstrate that when conditions are optimal for attentional focusing, the interference effects are almost entirely eliminated. This result has been interpreted as supporting early-selection accounts. The present study investigates the impact of focusing attention on negative priming in addition to interference effects. In a letter-identification task, reliable interference and negative priming effects were observed from distractors. However, when the location of the target in the prime display was pre-cued, interference effects were significantly reduced, but negative priming effects did not decrease. This pattern of results provides further evidence that the absence of interference is insufficient to determine whether distractors have been semantically processed (Driver & Tipper, 1989).

[1]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[2]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[3]  E. C. Dalrymple-Alford,et al.  Examination of Some Aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[5]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[6]  W. Neill,et al.  Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. , 1977 .

[7]  David LaBerge,et al.  Automatic Semantic Processing of Unattended Words. , 1979 .

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  G Underwood,et al.  Automatic phonological coding of unattended printed words , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field , 1983 .

[11]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. A Horse Race of a Different Color: Stroop Interference Patterns With Transformed Words v , 2022 .

[13]  A. Lambert.  Selectivity and stages of processing—An enduring controversy in attentional theory: A review , 1985 .

[14]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  C. Eriksen,et al.  An electromyographic examination of response competition , 1985 .

[16]  A. van der Heijden,et al.  Target-noise separation in visual selective attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[17]  D E Broadbent,et al.  Spatial Factors in Visual Attention: Some Compensatory Effects of Location and Time of Arrival of Nontargets , 1987, Perception.

[18]  S P Tipper,et al.  Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[20]  A. Lambert,et al.  Selective Attention, Visual Laterality, Awareness, and Perceiving the Meaning of Parafoveally Presented Words , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  W. Trammell Neill.  Lexical Ambiguity and Context: An Activation-Suppression Model , 1989 .

[22]  Jon Driver,et al.  On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. , 1989 .

[23]  L. Paquet,et al.  Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks , 1990 .

[25]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Jeff F. Miller.  The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Penny L. Yee,et al.  Semantic inhibition of Ignored Words during a Figure Classification Task , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  An inhibition-based fan effect : Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention , 1992 .

[29]  J. J. Ortells,et al.  Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Cathleen M. Moore,et al.  Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? , 1994 .

[31]  E Fox,et al.  Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition , 1994 .

[33]  W. Neill,et al.  Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. , 1995 .

[34]  E. Fox.  Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.