P 18. Transcranial direct current stimulation reverses stroke-induced network alterations in mice
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Hoehn | D. Wiedermann | L. Volz | M. Aswendt | M. A. Rueger | M. Schroeter | S. Blaschke | H. L. Walter | N. Pallast | S. Vlachakis | G. R. Fink
[1] P. Rossini,et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Neuroplasticity and Accelerates Motor Recovery in a Stroke Mouse Model , 2022, Stroke.
[2] H. Endepols,et al. An analysis of the CatWalk XT and a composite score to assess neurofunctional deficits after photothrombosis in mice , 2021, Neuroscience Letters.
[3] V. Di Lazzaro,et al. Neurobiological After-Effects of Low Intensity Transcranial Electric Stimulation of the Human Nervous System: From Basic Mechanisms to Metaplasticity , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.
[4] José M. Ausín,et al. Immediate and after effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex , 2021, Scientific Reports.
[5] Gesa Hartwigsen,et al. Probing rapid network reorganization of motor and language functions via neuromodulation and neuroimaging , 2020, NeuroImage.
[6] A. Büschges,et al. Introduction to spasticity and related mouse models , 2020, Experimental Neurology.
[7] A. Biegon,et al. Traumatic Brain Injury Severity in a Network Perspective: A Diffusion MRI Based Connectome Study , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[8] C. Colussi,et al. Enhancing Plasticity Mechanisms in the Mouse Motor Cortex by Anodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation: The Contribution of Nitric Oxide Signaling. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.
[9] G. Fink,et al. Transcranial Current Stimulation Alters the Expression of Immune-Mediating Genes , 2019, Front. Cell. Neurosci..
[10] Markus Aswendt,et al. Processing Pipeline for Atlas-Based Imaging Data Analysis of Structural and Functional Mouse Brain MRI (AIDAmri) , 2019, Front. Neuroinform..
[11] A. Villringer,et al. Predicting the Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke , 2019, Front. Neurol..
[12] Q. Xi,et al. Alterations of static functional connectivity and dynamic functional connectivity in motor execution regions after stroke , 2018, Neuroscience Letters.
[13] A. Opitz,et al. Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human , 2018, NeuroImage.
[14] D. Corbett,et al. Post-stroke kinematic analysis in rats reveals similar reaching abnormalities as humans , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[15] M. Hoehn,et al. Sensorimotor Functional and Structural Networks after Intracerebral Stem Cell Grafts in the Ischemic Mouse Brain , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[16] Vinzenz Fleischer,et al. Graph Theoretical Framework of Brain Networks in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Concepts , 2017, Neuroscience.
[17] Thomas T. Liu,et al. The global signal in fMRI: Nuisance or Information? , 2017, NeuroImage.
[18] S. Lefebvre,et al. Increased functional connectivity one week after motor learning and tDCS in stroke patients , 2017, Neuroscience.
[19] P. Rossini,et al. Small-World Characteristics of Cortical Connectivity Changes in Acute Stroke , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.
[20] Rudolf Graf,et al. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neurogenesis and Microglia Activation in the Mouse Brain , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[21] G. Fink,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in the male mouse to promote recovery after stroke , 2016, Laboratory animals.
[22] G. Fink,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation accelerates recovery of function, induces neurogenesis and recruits oligodendrocyte precursors in a rat model of stroke , 2016, Experimental Neurology.
[23] C. Grefkes,et al. Shaping Early Reorganization of Neural Networks Promotes Motor Function after Stroke , 2016, Cerebral cortex.
[24] J. Krakauer,et al. Fluoxetine Maintains a State of Heightened Responsiveness to Motor Training Early After Stroke in a Mouse Model , 2015, Stroke.
[25] Simon B. Eickhoff,et al. Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS , 2015, NeuroImage.
[26] T. Wieloch,et al. Treatment with AMD3100 attenuates the microglial response and improves outcome after experimental stroke , 2015, Journal of Neuroinflammation.
[27] N. Bargalló,et al. Prognostic value of changes in resting‐state functional connectivity patterns in cognitive recovery after stroke: A 3T fMRI pilot study , 2014, Human brain mapping.
[28] G. Fink,et al. Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.
[29] Mathias Hoehn,et al. Reliability and spatial specificity of rat brain sensorimotor functional connectivity networks are superior under sedation compared with general anesthesia , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.
[30] Abraham Z. Snyder,et al. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.
[31] Gert Kwakkel,et al. Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2011, Stroke.
[32] G. Fink,et al. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[33] M. Nitsche,et al. Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[34] M. V. D. Heuvel,et al. Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.
[35] C. Leamey,et al. Enrichment from Birth Accelerates the Functional and Cellular Development of a Motor Control Area in the Mouse , 2009, PloS one.
[36] M. Nitsche,et al. After-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical spreading depression , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.
[37] Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.
[38] L. Cohen,et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[39] J. Rothwell,et al. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.