P 18. Transcranial direct current stimulation reverses stroke-induced network alterations in mice

BACKGROUND: Beyond focal effects, stroke lesions impact the function of distributed networks. We here investigated (1) whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alters the network changes induced by cerebral ischemia and (2) whether functional network parameters predict the therapeutic efficacy of tDCS in a mouse model of focal photothrombotic stroke. METHODS: Starting 3 days after stroke, cathodal tDCS (charge density=39.6 kC/m²) was applied over 10 days in male C57Bl/6J mice under light anesthesia over the lesioned sensory-motor cortex. Functional connectivity (resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging) was evaluated for up to 28-day poststroke, with global graph parameters of network integration computed. RESULTS: Ischemia induced a subacute increase in connectivity accompanied by a significant reduction in characteristic path length, reversed by 10 days of tDCS. Early measures of functional network alterations and the network configuration at prestroke baseline predicted spontaneous and tDCS-augmented motor recovery. DISCUSSION: Stroke induces characteristic network changes throughout the brain that can be detected by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. These network changes were, at least in part, reversed by tDCS. Moreover, early markers of a network impairment and the network configuration before the insult improve the prediction of motor recovery.

[1]  P. Rossini,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Neuroplasticity and Accelerates Motor Recovery in a Stroke Mouse Model , 2022, Stroke.

[2]  H. Endepols,et al.  An analysis of the CatWalk XT and a composite score to assess neurofunctional deficits after photothrombosis in mice , 2021, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  V. Di Lazzaro,et al.  Neurobiological After-Effects of Low Intensity Transcranial Electric Stimulation of the Human Nervous System: From Basic Mechanisms to Metaplasticity , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[4]  José M. Ausín,et al.  Immediate and after effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Gesa Hartwigsen,et al.  Probing rapid network reorganization of motor and language functions via neuromodulation and neuroimaging , 2020, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Büschges,et al.  Introduction to spasticity and related mouse models , 2020, Experimental Neurology.

[7]  A. Biegon,et al.  Traumatic Brain Injury Severity in a Network Perspective: A Diffusion MRI Based Connectome Study , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[8]  C. Colussi,et al.  Enhancing Plasticity Mechanisms in the Mouse Motor Cortex by Anodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation: The Contribution of Nitric Oxide Signaling. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  G. Fink,et al.  Transcranial Current Stimulation Alters the Expression of Immune-Mediating Genes , 2019, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[10]  Markus Aswendt,et al.  Processing Pipeline for Atlas-Based Imaging Data Analysis of Structural and Functional Mouse Brain MRI (AIDAmri) , 2019, Front. Neuroinform..

[11]  A. Villringer,et al.  Predicting the Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[12]  Q. Xi,et al.  Alterations of static functional connectivity and dynamic functional connectivity in motor execution regions after stroke , 2018, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  A. Opitz,et al.  Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human , 2018, NeuroImage.

[14]  D. Corbett,et al.  Post-stroke kinematic analysis in rats reveals similar reaching abnormalities as humans , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[15]  M. Hoehn,et al.  Sensorimotor Functional and Structural Networks after Intracerebral Stem Cell Grafts in the Ischemic Mouse Brain , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Vinzenz Fleischer,et al.  Graph Theoretical Framework of Brain Networks in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Concepts , 2017, Neuroscience.

[17]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  The global signal in fMRI: Nuisance or Information? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Lefebvre,et al.  Increased functional connectivity one week after motor learning and tDCS in stroke patients , 2017, Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Rossini,et al.  Small-World Characteristics of Cortical Connectivity Changes in Acute Stroke , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  Rudolf Graf,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neurogenesis and Microglia Activation in the Mouse Brain , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  G. Fink,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in the male mouse to promote recovery after stroke , 2016, Laboratory animals.

[22]  G. Fink,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation accelerates recovery of function, induces neurogenesis and recruits oligodendrocyte precursors in a rat model of stroke , 2016, Experimental Neurology.

[23]  C. Grefkes,et al.  Shaping Early Reorganization of Neural Networks Promotes Motor Function after Stroke , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Fluoxetine Maintains a State of Heightened Responsiveness to Motor Training Early After Stroke in a Mouse Model , 2015, Stroke.

[25]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS , 2015, NeuroImage.

[26]  T. Wieloch,et al.  Treatment with AMD3100 attenuates the microglial response and improves outcome after experimental stroke , 2015, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[27]  N. Bargalló,et al.  Prognostic value of changes in resting‐state functional connectivity patterns in cognitive recovery after stroke: A 3T fMRI pilot study , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[28]  G. Fink,et al.  Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[29]  Mathias Hoehn,et al.  Reliability and spatial specificity of rat brain sensorimotor functional connectivity networks are superior under sedation compared with general anesthesia , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[30]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[31]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2011, Stroke.

[32]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[34]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[35]  C. Leamey,et al.  Enrichment from Birth Accelerates the Functional and Cellular Development of a Motor Control Area in the Mouse , 2009, PloS one.

[36]  M. Nitsche,et al.  After-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical spreading depression , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[38]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.