Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge
暂无分享,去创建一个
Adam Palayew | Lauge Neimann Rasmussen | Tue Helms Andersen | T. H. Andersen | J. Lazarus | A. Palayew | Jeffrey V. Lazarus | Ole Norgaard | K. Safreed-Harmon | Kelly Safreed-Harmon | O. Nørgaard | Adam Palayew
[1] J. Regnaux,et al. Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study , 2019, BMC Medicine.
[2] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. Coronavirus disease 2019: The harms of exaggerated information and non‐evidence‐based measures , 2020, European journal of clinical investigation.
[3] G. Heinze,et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal , 2020, BMJ.
[4] S. Horbach. Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19 , 2020, bioRxiv.
[5] Iveta Simera,et al. A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network , 2016, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.
[6] Mohammad Hossein Khosravi,et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2018, Lancet.
[7] K. Baždarić,et al. ESE and EASE call for high standards of research and editing , 2020 .
[8] Cassi Beckham. COVID-19 Resources , 2020 .