Synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals antimony sequestration by reduced sulfur in a freshwater wetland sediment

Environmental context Antimony is an environmental contaminant of increasing concern, due to its growing industrial usage in flame retardants, lead alloys, glass, ceramics and plastics. Here we show, using X-ray absorption spectroscopy, that antimony may be trapped in wetland sediments by reduced sulfur. This finding has implications for the management and remediation of wetlands contaminated with antimony. Abstract The biogeochemistry of antimony (Sb) in wetland sediments is poorly characterised, despite their importance as contaminant sinks. The organic-rich, reducing nature of wetland sediments may facilitate sequestration mechanisms that are not typically present in oxic soils, where the majority of research to date has taken place. Using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), we present evidence of antimony speciation being dominated by secondary antimony–sulfur phases in a wetland sediment. Our results demonstrate that, by incorporating a newly developed SbIII–organic sulfur reference standard, linear combination fitting analysis of antimony K-edge XAS spectra and robust statistical assessment of fit quality allows the reliable discrimination of SbIII coordination environments. We found that a contaminated wetland sediment in New South Wales, Australia, contained 57% of the total antimony as SbIII–phases, with 44% present as a highly-disordered antimony phase, likely consisting of SbIII complexed by organic sulfur (e.g. thiols) or an amorphous SbIII sulfide (e.g. SbS3). The methodological approach outlined in this study and our identification of the importance of reduced sulfur in sequestering antimony has implications for future research in the area of antimony biogeochemistry, and for the management of both natural and artificial wetlands contaminated with antimony.

[1]  P. Teasdale,et al.  Antimony and arsenic exhibit contrasting spatial distributions in the sediment and vegetation of a contaminated wetland. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[2]  M. Janousch,et al.  Release of antimony from contaminated soil induced by redox changes. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[3]  M. Gräfe,et al.  Speciation of metal(loid)s in environmental samples by X-ray absorption spectroscopy: a critical review. , 2014, Analytica chimica acta.

[4]  S. Calvin,et al.  XAFS for Everyone , 2013 .

[5]  Peter A. Williams,et al.  Antimony interactions with heterogeneous complexants in waters, sediments and soils: A review of binding data for homologous compounds , 2012 .

[6]  C. Mikutta,et al.  Arsenic sequestration by organic sulphur in peat , 2012 .

[7]  Montserrat Filella,et al.  Antimony interactions with heterogeneous complexants in waters, sediments and soils: A review of data obtained in bulk samples , 2011 .

[8]  Y. Terada,et al.  micro-XANES evidence for the reduction of Sb(V) to Sb(III) in soil from Sb mine tailing. , 2010, Environmental Science and Technology.

[9]  R. Gordon,et al.  Optimizing experimental design, overcoming challenges, and gaining valuable information from the Sb K-edge XANES region , 2009 .

[10]  P. Williams,et al.  Antimony in the environment: knowns and unknowns , 2009 .

[11]  A. Rossberg,et al.  Reduction of antimony by nano-particulate magnetite and mackinawite , 2008, Mineralogical Magazine.

[12]  Ruben Kretzschmar,et al.  Quantitative Antimony Speciation in Shooting-Range Soils by EXAFS Spectroscopy , 2006 .

[13]  M Newville,et al.  ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. , 2005, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[14]  J. Damsté,et al.  Organic sulfur biogeochemistry: Recent advances and future research directions , 2004 .