Testing models of attention with MEG

Neuroimaging methods have recently added new opportunities to test models of attention to deficit studies and approaches relying on invasive single and few unit electrophysiology. These techniques have very different time resolution so, a bridging technology is needed to link results from the slow hemodynamic methods and invasive electrophysiology. Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) rely on non-invasive measures of mass electrical activity and are good candidates for this task. Some new insights have already been obtained using EEG and/or MEG in conjunction with fMRI. In these studies, the average EEG or MEG signal was used, often with constraints from fMRI, to study changes in the timecourse of regional activations under different attentional load. We postulate an engineering control framework that is broadly consistent with recent findings and generates predictions about when specific modules will become active under different attention paradigms. Specifically, the presence of relatively early temporal signals is predicted to occur in the parietal and frontal lobes as part of the attention-based CODAM model of consciousness. Tomographic analysis of single trial MEG data from a GO/NOGO task then identifies well-circumscribed regional increases and decreases of activity that confirm these general predictions. The results show how detailed information can be extracted from single subject data when the richness of information in the single trial MEG data is carefully analyzed and point the way for more elaborate analysis in the future.

[1]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem , 1990 .

[2]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[3]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[6]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[7]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  The planning and control of reaching movements , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. II: physiological mechanisms of modulation. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  John G. Taylor,et al.  Attention as a neural control system , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).

[12]  A. Ioannides,et al.  Contribution of the human superior parietal lobule to spatial selection process: an MEG study , 2001, Brain Research.

[13]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Delayed Striate Cortical Activation during Spatial Attention , 2002, Neuron.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  P. Fenwick,et al.  Early striate activity related to attention in a choice reaction task , 2003, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2003..

[18]  John G. Taylor Paying attention to consciousness , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.