Radiographic Comparison of Vertical Tibial Translation Using Two Types of Suspensions on a Transtibial Prosthesis: A Case Study

Limiting vertical displacement within the transtibial prosthesis is the primary objective of a suspension mechanism. Two types of suspensions, the neoprene sleeve and the silicone suction socket suspension with lock, were compared on a single patient by using radiographic measurement of vertical tibial displacement and vertical soft-tissue displacement. Measurements were taken in weightbearing, partial weightbearing, and nonweightbearing positions. Tibial displacement was similar for both suspension methods. The neoprene sleeve suspension allowed 1.8 cm more distal soft-tissue displacement than did the silicone suction socket suspension. The patient reported comfort in both suspensions, but noted more “pistoning” in the neoprene sleeve suspension.

[1]  G H Koepke,et al.  Negative pressures during swing phase in below-knee prostheses with rubber sleeve suspension. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  R W Wirta,et al.  Analysis of below-knee suspension systems: effect on gait. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Suction socket suspension for below-knee amputees. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  T. Nosaka,et al.  Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: A comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.