A conceptual framework to define the spatial resolution requirements for agricultural monitoring using remote sensing

Satellite remote sensing is an invaluable tool to monitor agricultural resources. However, spatial patterns in agricultural landscapes vary significantly across the Earth resulting in different imagery requirements depending on what part of the globe is observed. Furthermore, there is an increasing diversity of Earth observation instruments providing imagery with various configurations of spatial, temporal, spectral and angular resolutions. In terms of spatial resolution, the choice of imagery should be conditioned by knowing the appropriate spatial frequency at which the landscape must be sampled with the imaging instrument in order to provide the required information from the targeted fields. This paper presents a conceptual framework to define quantitatively such requirements for both crop area estimation and crop growth monitoring based on user-defined constraints. The methodological development is based on simulating how agricultural landscapes, and more specifically the fields covered by a crop of interest, are seen by instruments with increasingly coarser resolving power. The results are provided not only in terms of acceptable pixel size but also of pixel purity which is the degree of homogeneity with respect to the target crop. This trade-off between size and purity can be adjusted according to the end-user's requirements. The method is implemented over various agricultural landscapes with contrasting spatial patterns, demonstrating its operational applicability. This diagnostic approach can be used: (i) to guide users in choosing the most appropriate imagery for their application, (ii) to evaluate the adequacy of existing remote sensing systems for monitoring agriculture in different regions of the world and (iii) to provide guidelines for space agencies to design future instruments dedicated to agriculture monitoring. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

[1]  K. R. McCloy,et al.  Optimizing Image Resolution to Maximize the Accuracy of Hard Classification , 2007 .

[2]  Jesslyn F. Brown,et al.  Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery , 1994 .

[3]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[4]  Jean-François Ledent,et al.  Crop specific information extraction based on coarse resolution pixel sampling , 2005 .

[5]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. II. Simple image models , 1989 .

[6]  A. Cracknell Review article Synergy in remote sensing-what's in a pixel? , 1998 .

[7]  Pierre Defourny,et al.  A Method to Determine the Appropriate Spatial Resolution Required for Monitoring Crop Growth in a given Agricultural Landscape , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[8]  P. Fisher The pixel: A snare and a delusion , 1997 .

[9]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Spatial variation in land cover and choice of spatial resolution for remote sensing , 2004 .

[10]  J. Townshend,et al.  Beware of per-pixel characterization of land cover , 2000 .

[11]  J. Townshend The spatial resolving power of earth resources satellites , 1980 .

[12]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations , 1997 .

[13]  G. Dedieu,et al.  SMAC: a simplified method for the atmospheric correction of satellite measurements in the solar spectrum , 1994 .

[14]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images , 1988 .

[15]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing: I , 1988 .

[16]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[17]  Harry Nyquist Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory , 1928 .

[18]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. I. Basic theory , 1988 .

[19]  S. Garrigues,et al.  Multiscale geostatistical analysis of AVHRR, SPOT-VGT, and MODIS global NDVI products , 2008 .

[20]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Resolution dependent errors in remote sensing of cultivated areas , 2006 .

[21]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Using Satellite and Field Data with Crop Growth Modeling to Monitor and Estimate Corn Yield in Mexico , 2002 .

[22]  F. Baret,et al.  Quantifying spatial heterogeneity at the landscape scale using variogram models , 2006 .

[23]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Remote sensing, models, and methods for image processing , 1997 .

[24]  F. J. Gallego Remote sensing and land cover area estimation , 2004 .

[25]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Remote Sensing for Crop Management , 2003 .

[26]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Defining an optimal size of support for remote sensing investigations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  Curtis E. Woodcock,et al.  The effect of spatial resolution on the ability to monitor the status of agricultural lands , 1997 .

[28]  C. Justice,et al.  Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations , 1988 .

[29]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Multivariate quantification of landscape spatial heterogeneity using variogram models , 2008 .

[30]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[31]  J. Townshend,et al.  Impact of sensor's point spread function on land cover characterization: Assessment and deconvolution , 2002 .

[32]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  A review on reflective remote sensing and data assimilation techniques for enhanced agroecosystem modeling , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[33]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[34]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[35]  Patrick Bogaert,et al.  Respective contribution of yield and area estimates to the error in crop production forecasting , 2007 .

[36]  R. Fournier,et al.  Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 2. The optimal spatial resolution , 1994 .

[37]  P. J. Curran,et al.  Selecting a spatial resolution for estimation of per-field green leaf area index , 1988 .

[38]  Aaron Moody,et al.  Scale-dependent errors in the estimation of land-cover proportions. Implications for global land-cover datasets , 1994 .

[39]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..