A Model of How Different Biology Experts Explain Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms

This study used a literature review and interviews with practicing biologists to develop the MACH model, a Venn diagram of the components research scientists include when explaining molecular and cellular mechanisms. Seven biologists from different subdisciplines included research Methods, Analogy, Context, and How the mechanism works to explain the systems they investigate.

[1]  Konrad J. Schönborn,et al.  A Model of Factors Determining Students’ Ability to Interpret External Representations in Biochemistry , 2009 .

[2]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. , 2000 .

[3]  M. Chi.  Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics , 2006 .

[4]  P. Machamer,et al.  Thinking about Mechanisms , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[5]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Traits, genes, particles and information: re‐visiting students’ understandings of genetics , 2004 .

[6]  J. John Loughran,et al.  Researching Teaching: Methodologies and Practices for Understanding Pedagogy , 1999 .

[7]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers , 2002 .

[8]  Jessica Watkins,et al.  Context Dependence of Students’ Views about the Role of Equations in Understanding Biology , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  A. J. Waarlo,et al.  Modelling Molecular Mechanisms: A Framework of Scientific Reasoning to Construct Molecular-Level Explanations for Cellular Behaviour , 2011, Science & Education.

[11]  A. Janetos.  A New Biology for the 21st Century , 2009 .

[12]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[13]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[14]  J. Adler.  Chemotaxis in Bacteria , 1966, Science.

[15]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Reasoning across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students' Understandings of Molecular Genetics. , 2007 .

[16]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[18]  L. Talmy.  Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[19]  D. Rudge.  :What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. , 2005 .

[20]  Nancy Pelaez,et al.  A Tetrahedral Version of the MACH Model for Explaining Biological Mechanisms , 2014 .

[21]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[22]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Carl-Johan Rundgren,et al.  Educational Challenges of Molecular Life Science: Characteristics and Implications for Education and Research , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Anat Zohar,et al.  Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions , 1998 .

[25]  Konrad J. Schönborn,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATION ACROSS EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS: EXPERTS' VIEWS AND CHALLENGES FOR LEARNING , 2009 .

[26]  M. Surette,et al.  Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  F. Gobet,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[28]  Eleanor Abrams,et al.  The how's and why's of biological change: How learners neglect physical mechanisms in their search for meaning , 2001 .

[29]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[30]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Exploring Dominant Types of Explanations Built by General Chemistry Students , 2010 .

[32]  M. Windschitl,et al.  Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education , 2011 .

[33]  Nancy Pelaez,et al.  An Activity Aimed at Improving Student Explanations of Biological Mechanisms , 2014 .

[34]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  Identifying and Developing Students' Ability to Reason with Concepts and Representations in Biology , 2013 .

[35]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[36]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[37]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 2: Whose voice? Whose ears? , 1998 .

[38]  Jennifer Attride-Stirling.  Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research , 2001 .

[39]  R. Justi,et al.  The Relationships Between Modelling and Argumentation from the Perspective of the Model of Modelling Diagram , 2013 .

[40]  H. Lodish.  Molecular Cell Biology , 1986 .

[41]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[42]  R. Duit.  On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[43]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science , 2008 .