Why People Do What They Do to Protect Against Earthquake Risk: Perceptions of Hazard Adjustment Attributes

This study examined respondents' self-reported adoption of 16 hazard adjustments (preimpact actions to reduce danger to persons and property), their perceptions of those adjustments' attributes, and the correlations of those perceived attributes with respondents' demographic characteristics. The sample comprised 561 randomly selected residents from three cities in Southern California prone to high seismic risk and three cities from Western Washington prone to moderate seismic risks. The results show that the hazard adjustment perceptions were defined by hazard-related attributes and resource-related attributes. More significantly, the respondents had a significant degree of consensus in their ratings of those attributes and used them to differentiate among the hazard adjustments, as indicated by statistically significant differences among the hazard adjustment profiles. Finally, there were many significant correlations between respondents' demographic characteristics and the perceived characteristics of hazard adjustments, but there were few consistent patterns among these correlations.

[1]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Earthquake Insurance in California , 1990 .

[2]  C Eadie,et al.  LIVING IN EARTHQUAKE COUNTRY , 2005 .

[3]  Linda B. Bourque,et al.  Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Actions before and after Two Earthquakes , 1995 .

[4]  H. Kunreuther.  Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons , 1978 .

[5]  M. L. Edwards,et al.  Social Location and Self-Protective Behavior: Implications for Earthquake Preparedness , 1993, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[6]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  After a California Earthquake: Attitude and Behavior Change , 1992 .

[7]  M K Lindell,et al.  Motivational and organizational factors affecting implementation of worker safety training. , 1994, Occupational medicine.

[8]  P. Converse,et al.  Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue , 1970 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[10]  M. Lindell,et al.  A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement for Multi-Item Ratings of a Single Target , 1999 .

[11]  M K Lindell,et al.  Correlates of Household Seismic Hazard Adjustment Adoption , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Sharing Environmental Risks: How To Control Governments' Losses In Natural Disasters , 1991 .

[13]  Joanne M. Nigg,et al.  Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California , 1986 .

[14]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[15]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[16]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Plans, Code Enforcement, and Damage Reduction: Evidence from the Northridge Earthquake , 1998 .

[17]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Recent Issues Regarding rWG, rWG, rWG(J), and rWG(J) , 2005 .

[18]  M K Lindell,et al.  Effects of the Chernobyl accident on public perceptions of nuclear plant accident risks. , 1990, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  The Role of Searching in Shaping Reactions to Earthquake Risk Information , 1997 .

[20]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. , 1993 .

[21]  M. Lindell,et al.  Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of CVI, T, r-sub(WG(J)), and r*-sub(WG(J)) indexes. , 1999 .

[22]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  The Great Earthquake Experiment: Risk Communication And Public Action , 1993 .

[23]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[24]  Dennis S. Mileti,et al.  Societal Response to Revised Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1995, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[25]  L. F. Molerio-Leon,et al.  Survey Methods , 2011 .

[26]  Peter V. Miller,et al.  Web Survey Methods Introduction , 2008 .

[27]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Measuring Interrater Agreement for Ratings of a Single Target , 1997 .

[28]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  The effects of a large destructive local earthquake on earthquake preparedness as assessed by an earthquake preparedness scale , 1990 .

[29]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[30]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Chapter 10 – Mail and Other Self-Administered Questionnaires1 , 1983 .

[31]  Peter M. Sandman,et al.  Industry risk communication manual : improving dialogue with communities , 1990 .

[32]  R. Lippa,et al.  Behavioral Change in Earthquake Preparedness Due to Negative Threat Appeals: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory , 1990 .

[33]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Plans Can Matter! The Role of Land Use Plans and State Planning Mandates in Limiting the Development of Hazardous Areas , 1994 .

[34]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning , 1992 .

[35]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[36]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[37]  M. Lindell,et al.  Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard , 2000 .

[38]  N. Weinstein.  Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[39]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Plan Quality and Mitigating Damage from Natural Disasters: A Case Study of the Northridge Earthquake with Planning Policy Considerations , 2002 .

[40]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Adoption and Implementation of Hazard Adjustments , 1997 .

[41]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Household Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments: A Comparison of Residents in Two States , 2000, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[42]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Perceived Stakeholder Role Relationships and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments1 , 2007, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[43]  E. J. Kaiser,et al.  Unleashing the Power of Planning to Create Disaster-Resistant Communities , 1999 .

[44]  Weimin Dong,et al.  Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance against Natural Disasters in the United States , 1999 .

[45]  R M Groves,et al.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[46]  Michael K Lindell,et al.  Households' Perceived Personal Risk and Responses in a Multihazard Environment , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  S. Ormerod,et al.  The environment as hazard: (2nd edn). By I. Burton, R. W. Kates & G. F. White. Guildford Press, New York, 1993, ISBN 0-89862-159-3, 290 pp. Price: £16.99 , 1995 .

[48]  M. Lindell,et al.  Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities , 2003 .

[49]  E. Singer,et al.  The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. , 2000, Public opinion quarterly.

[50]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Perceived Characteristics of Environmental Hazards , 1994, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[51]  N D Weinstein,et al.  Correct and incorrect interpretations of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[52]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Risk Area Residents’ Perceptions and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments1 , 2002 .

[53]  John-Paul Mulilis,et al.  Negative Threat Appeals and Earthquake Preparedness: A Person-Relative-to-Event (PrE) Model of Coping With Threat , 1995 .

[54]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments , 1975 .

[55]  James Lewis,et al.  Natural Hazards - Local, National and Global , 1976 .