Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of emergency department (ED) copayment levels on ED use and unfavorable clinical events. Data Source/Study Setting. Kaiser Permanente-Northern California (KPNC), a prepaid integrated delivery system. STUDY DESIGN In a quasi-experimental longitudinal study with concurrent controls, we estimated rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths associated with higher ED copayments relative to no copayment, using Poisson random effects and proportional hazard models, controlling for patient characteristics. The study period began in January 1999; more than half of the population experienced an employer-chosen increase in their ED copayment in January 2000. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS Using KPNC automated databases, the 2000 U.S. Census, and California state death certificates, we collected data on ED visits and unfavorable clinical events over a 36-month period (January 1999 through December 2001) among 2,257,445 commercially insured and 261,091 Medicare insured health system members. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Among commercially insured subjects, ED visits decreased 12 percent with the $20-35 copayment (95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 11-13 percent), and 23 percent with the $50-100 copayment (95 percent CI: 23-24 percent) compared with no copayment. Hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths did not increase with copayments. Hospitalizations decreased 4 percent (95 percent CI: 2-6 percent) and 10 percent (95 percent CI: 7-13 percent) with ED copayments of $20-35 and $50-100, respectively, compared with no copayment. Among Medicare subjects, ED visits decreased by 4 percent (95 percent CI: 3-6 percent) with the $20-50 copayments compared with no copayment; unfavorable clinical events did not increase with copayments, e.g., hospitalizations were unchanged (95 percent CI: -3 percent to +2 percent) with $20-50 ED copayments compared with no copayment. CONCLUSIONS Relatively modest levels of patient cost-sharing for ED care decreased ED visit rates without increasing the rate of unfavorable clinical events.

[1]  J. Newhouse,et al.  Care-Seeking Behavior in Response to Emergency Department Copayments , 2005, Medical care.

[2]  Ellen Meara,et al.  Impact of Medicare coverage on basic clinical services for previously uninsured adults. , 2003, JAMA.

[3]  David Wennberg,et al.  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 2: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  A. Kellermann.  Coverage matters: insurance and health care. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  J Z Ayanian,et al.  Measuring population health risks using inpatient diagnoses and outpatient pharmacy data. , 2001, Health services research.

[6]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  Effects of cost sharing on care seeking and health status: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[7]  D. Baker,et al.  Lack of health insurance and decline in overall health in late middle age. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  H. Schauffler,et al.  The direct and indirect effects of cost-sharing on the use of preventive services. , 2000, Health services research.

[9]  N Krieger,et al.  Re: "Use of census-based aggregate variables to proxy for socioeconomic group: evidence from national samples". , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Invited commentary: propensity scores. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  G. Imbens.  The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions , 1999 .

[12]  E. Fisher,et al.  Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: how might more be worse? , 1999, JAMA.

[13]  R. Horwitz,et al.  The Consequences of Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Lyme Disease: An Observational Study , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Donald Rubin,et al.  Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  E H Wagner,et al.  Absence of association between insurance copayments and delays in seeking emergency care among patients with myocardial infarction. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Variation among hospitals in coronary-angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Selby,et al.  Effect of a copayment on use of the emergency department in a health maintenance organization. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  R. Rj,et al.  Cost sharing in health insurance. , 1995 .

[19]  J. Blustein.  Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Selby,et al.  Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Amputation in Persons With Diabetes , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[21]  T. Bennett,et al.  Insurance-related differences in the risk of ruptured appendix. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J Z Ayanian,et al.  The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  C Gatsonis,et al.  Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. , 1992, JAMA.

[24]  N. Krieger.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[25]  R. M. Shelton,et al.  Hospital use and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Keeler,et al.  How free care improved vision in the health insurance experiment. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[27]  W. Manning,et al.  Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  Effects of cost sharing on seeking care for serious and minor symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[29]  E. Keeler,et al.  How free care reduced hypertension in the health insurance experiment. , 1985, JAMA.

[30]  W. Manning,et al.  The impact of cost sharing on emergency department use. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending: Health Outcomes and Satisfaction with Care , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[32]  D. Bates,et al.  Using Diagnoses to Describe Populations and Predict Costs , 2000, Health care financing review.

[33]  W. Manning,et al.  Moral Hazard and Consumer Incentives in Health Care , 2000 .

[34]  R. Rubin,et al.  Cost sharing in health insurance. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  J. Newhouse.  Free for All?: Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment , 1993 .

[36]  D. Reboussin,et al.  Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial. , 1986, Medical care.