Framework for Business Process and Rule Integration: A Case of BPMN and SBVR

In the current heavily regulated business world, organisations struggle to establish a consistent view of their policies and operating procedures. These are generally captured through process modeling and business rule modeling, resulting in separate representations of rules and actual practice. The separation of the two models leads to increased risk of noncompliance, as well as reduced benefits from process improvement initiatives. So far, little guidance exists for organisations who struggle to consolidate their existing process models and business rules into one holistic model. In this paper we propose a preliminary framework that provides an overarching scope for the consolidation of existing business process models and business rule descriptions. The framework is supported by a collection of mapping methods (currently based on BPMN and SBVR) that assist business modelers in identifying inconsistencies between their existing business process models and business rule repositories, and thus helps to establish a coherent view of organizational policies and procedures.

[1]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  Translating business contract into compliant business processes , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC'06).

[2]  Wil M.P. van der Aalst,et al.  YAWL: yet another workflow language , 2005, Inf. Syst..

[3]  John Krogstie,et al.  Information Systems Development Using a Combination of Process and Rule Based Approaches , 1991, CAiSE.

[4]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  On Capturing Process Requirements of Workflow Based Business Information Systems , 1999, BIS.

[5]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance , 2007, BPM.

[6]  Jan Recker,et al.  How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation , 2008, CAiSE.

[7]  Pradeep Ravikumar,et al.  Adaptive Name Matching in Information Integration , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[8]  Marta Indulska,et al.  How good is BPMN really? Insights from theory and practice , 2006, ECIS.

[9]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Towards integrated modeling of business processes and business rules , 2008 .

[10]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Business Process Model and Notation - Third International Workshop, BPMN 2011, Lucerne, Switzerland, November 21-22, 2011. Proceedings , 2011, Business Process Modeling Notation.

[11]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Information integration using logical views , 1997, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Liangzhao Zeng,et al.  An agent-based approach for supporting cross-enterprise workflows , 2001, Proceedings 12th Australasian Database Conference. ADC 2001.

[13]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  A Survey of Comparative Business Process Modeling Approaches , 2007, BIS.

[14]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges , 2009, CAiSE.

[15]  Gerhard Knolmayer,et al.  Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules , 2000, Business Process Management.

[16]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation , 2007, J. Data Semant..

[17]  Dan Suciu,et al.  Adding Structure to Unstructured Data , 1997, ICDT.

[18]  Shazia Wasim Sadiq,et al.  Detecting Regulatory Compliance for Business Process Models through Semantic Annotations , 2008, Business Process Management Workshops.

[19]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Modeling languages for business processes and business rules: A representational analysis , 2009, Inf. Syst..

[20]  Sergei Nirenburg,et al.  Book Review: Ontological Semantics, by Sergei Nirenburg and Victor Raskin , 2004, CL.

[21]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[22]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.