Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory

Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.

[1]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The Perception of Spatial Layout in a Virtual World , 2000, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[2]  S. Moffat,et al.  Navigation in a “Virtual” Maze: Sex Differences and Correlation With Psychometric Measures of Spatial Ability in Humans , 1998 .

[3]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Active and passive scene recognition across views , 1999, Cognition.

[4]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in route-learning , 1993 .

[5]  E. Spelke,et al.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation , 2000, Cognition.

[6]  T. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  I. Silverman,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SPATIAL BEHAVIORS: APPLICATIONS TO ROUTE LEARNING , 1996 .

[8]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  R Biegler,et al.  Landmark Stability: Further Studies Pointing to a Role in Spatial Learning , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  Martin J. Farrell,et al.  Mental Rotation and the Automatic Updating of Body-Centered Spatial Relationships , 1998 .

[11]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Place Learning in Virtual Space: II. Topographical Relations as One Dimension of Stimulus Control☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[12]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis , 1997 .

[13]  Bruno Poucet,et al.  Relationships between Place Cell Firing Fields and Navigational Decisions by Rats , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of cognitive mapping of the large-scale environment , 1978 .

[16]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  The coding and transformation of spatial information , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[19]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .

[20]  A. Black,et al.  Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats ☆ ☆☆ , 1980 .

[21]  J. Thomson,et al.  Automatic Spatial Updating during Locomotion without Vision , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  A. Fenton,et al.  Place navigation in the Morris water maze under minimum and redundant extra-maze cue conditions. , 1994, Behavioral and neural biology.

[23]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[24]  H. Pick,et al.  Environmental differentiation and familiarity as determinants of children's memory for spatial location. , 1975 .

[25]  John O'Keefe,et al.  On the trail of the hippocampal engram , 1980 .

[26]  Roland Maurer,et al.  Rats in a transparent morris water maze use elemental and configural geometry of landmarks as well as distance to the pool wall , 2000, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[27]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  View-Based Cognitive Mapping and Path Planning , 1995, Adapt. Behav..

[28]  Irwin Silverman,et al.  Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. , 1992 .

[29]  J. M. Dabbs,et al.  Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and Women , 1998 .

[30]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  T. McNamara,et al.  Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  C C Presson,et al.  Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space , 1994, Perception.

[33]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[34]  L. K. Miller,et al.  Sex differences in spatial abilities: strategic and experiential correlates. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[35]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[36]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Influence of a sensorimotor conflict on the memorization of a path traveled in virtual reality. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[38]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[39]  Paul N. Wilson,et al.  The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment , 1994 .

[40]  T. McNamara,et al.  Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  C C Presson,et al.  The development of landmarks in spatial memory: the role of differential experience. , 1987, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[42]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[43]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  S. Huettel,et al.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  R. Biegler,et al.  Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning , 1993, Nature.

[46]  Hanspeter A Mallot,et al.  Route Navigating without Place Recognition: What is Recognised in Recognition-Triggered Responses? , 2000, Perception.

[47]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.