In analysing students’ reasoning about simple electric circuits, it is useful to think in terms of three aspects: (a) quantitative relationships, which are defined by algebraic expressions between circuit parameters; (6) functional relationships, which involve qualitative considerations, and lead to a correct description of the interplay between circuit variables; and (c) processes involving macro‐micro relationships, where the macroscopic circuit parameters are tied with microscopic models and rules. We argue that all three aspects are necessary for a proper understanding of the topic. While there is considerable information about the first two aspects with regard to student reasoning, little is known about the third. In this study, we have investigated this aspect with students in an advanced high school course. We find that even in very simple situations, most students do not tie concepts from electrostatics into their description of the phenomena. This leads to severe inconsistencies in student answer...
[1]
B. Eylon,et al.
Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts
,
1983
.
[2]
J. J. Dupin,et al.
Conceptions of french pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution
,
1987
.
[3]
Dimitris Psillos,et al.
Voltage presented as a primary concept in an introductory teaching sequence on DC circuits
,
1988
.
[4]
M. A. Heald.
Electric fields and charges in elementary circuits
,
1984
.
[5]
H. Härtel.
The Electric Circuit as a System: A New Approach
,
1982
.
[6]
David Shipstone,et al.
A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits
,
1984
.