Electron beam fabrication of a microfluidic device for studying submicron-scale bacteria

BackgroundControlled restriction of cellular movement using microfluidics allows one to study individual cells to gain insight into aspects of their physiology and behaviour. For example, the use of micron-sized growth channels that confine individual Escherichia coli has yielded novel insights into cell growth and death. To extend this approach to other species of bacteria, many of whom have dimensions in the sub-micron range, or to a larger range of growth conditions, a readily-fabricated device containing sub-micron features is required.ResultsHere we detail the fabrication of a versatile device with growth channels whose widths range from 0.3 μ m to 0.8 μ m. The device is fabricated using electron beam lithography, which provides excellent control over the shape and size of different growth channels and facilitates the rapid-prototyping of new designs. Features are successfully transferred first into silicon, and subsequently into the polydimethylsiloxane that forms the basis of the working microfluidic device. We demonstrate that the growth of sub-micron scale bacteria such as Lactococcus lactis or Escherichia coli cultured in minimal medium can be followed in such a device over several generations.ConclusionsWe have presented a detailed protocol based on electron beam fabrication together with specific dry etching procedures for the fabrication of a microfluidic device suited to study submicron-sized bacteria. We have demonstrated that both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria can be successfully loaded and imaged over a number of generations in this device. Similar devices could potentially be used to study other submicron-sized organisms under conditions in which the height and shape of the growth channels are crucial to the experimental design.

[1]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[2]  P. Cluzel,et al.  The single-cell chemostat: an agarose-based, microfluidic device for high-throughput, single-cell studies of bacteria and bacterial communities. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[3]  R. Zare,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for single-cell analysis. , 2010, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[4]  James C. W. Locke,et al.  Using movies to analyse gene circuit dynamics in single cells , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  J. Berg,et al.  Studies on surface wettability of poly(dimethyl) siloxane (PDMS) and glass under oxygen-plasma treatment and correlation with bond strength , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[6]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Robust Growth of Escherichia coli , 2010, Current Biology.

[7]  Axel Scherer,et al.  A microfluidic processor for gene expression profiling of single human embryonic stem cells. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[8]  E. Eliopoulos,et al.  Cell size of various lactic acid bacteria as determined by scanning electron microscope and image analysis , 1998 .

[9]  D. Marshall,et al.  Microfluidics for single cell analysis. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Monitoring dynamics of single-cell gene expression over multiple cell cycles , 2005, 2006 Bio Micro and Nanosystems Conference.

[11]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Bacterial growth and motility in sub-micron constrictions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Yan Wang,et al.  Microfluidic techniques for dynamic single-cell analysis , 2010 .

[13]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Matteo Altissimo,et al.  E-beam lithography for micro-nanofabrication. , 2010, Biomicrofluidics.

[15]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Improved pattern transfer in soft lithography using composite stamps , 2002 .

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfabrication meets microbiology , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  J. Wei Silicon MEMS for Detection of Liquid and Solid Fronts , 2010 .

[18]  Deirdre R. Meldrum,et al.  Life-on-a-chip , 2003, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[19]  P. Davies,et al.  Amyloid-beta peptide degradation in cell cultures by mycoplasma contaminants , 2008, BMC Research Notes.

[20]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[21]  Kristen L. Helton,et al.  Microfluidic Overview of Global Health Issues Microfluidic Diagnostic Technologies for Global Public Health , 2006 .

[22]  Thomas Glinsner,et al.  High resolution lithography with PDMS molds , 2004 .

[23]  Hongkai Wu,et al.  A scalable microfluidic chip for bacterial suspension culture. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[24]  Peng Guo,et al.  Microfluidic capture and release of bacteria in a conical nanopore array. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[25]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[26]  M. Bennett,et al.  Microfluidic devices for measuring gene network dynamics in single cells , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  Wei E Huang,et al.  When single cell technology meets omics, the new toolbox of analytical biotechnology is emerging. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks , 2009, Nature.

[29]  E. Ron,et al.  Changes in cell dimensions during amino acid starvation of Escherichia coli , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  Bruce K. Gale,et al.  Determining the optimal PDMS–PDMS bonding technique for microfluidic devices , 2008 .

[31]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane) , 2000, Electrophoresis.

[32]  K. Young,et al.  Penicillin Binding Protein 5 Affects Cell Diameter, Contour, and Morphology of Escherichia coli , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  A. Ridley,et al.  Cell structure and dynamics. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[34]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Microfluidics-based devices: New tools for studying cancer and cancer stem cell migration. , 2011, Biomicrofluidics.

[35]  M. D. de Boer,et al.  Black silicon method X: a review on high speed and selective plasma etching of silicon with profile control: an in-depth comparison between Bosch and cryostat DRIE processes as a roadmap to next generation equipment , 2009 .

[36]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[37]  D. Vaulot,et al.  Prochlorococcus, a Marine Photosynthetic Prokaryote of Global Significance , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[38]  Kahp Yang Suh,et al.  Cell research with physically modified microfluidic channels: a review. , 2008, Lab on a chip.