Stochastic Phonological Knowledge and Word Formation in Japanese

The question of whether linguistic knowledge is binary (i.e., grammatical vs. ungrammatical) or stochastic is one of the most important questions in general linguistic inquiry. Much recent work in the last few decades has argued that phonological knowledge is stochastic (e.g., Hayes & Londe 2006). Building on this body of research, we show that in Japanese, gradient phonological knowledge affects several word formation patterns in stochastic ways. Concretely, we show that identity avoidance effects hold at both the segmental and the CV-moraic levels and stochastically affect two types of word formation patterns in Japanese: group name formation and rendaku. We show that Maximum Entropy Grammar (Goldwater & Johnson 2003), together with multiple OCP constraints (Coetzee & Pater 2008), successfully models both of the observed morphological word formation patterns without any further stipulation. In addition to this theoretical contribution, one of the patterns discussed in this paper—group name formation—has not been analyzed from the perspective of formal phonological theories before, and hence this paper has descriptive novelty as well.*

[1]  Morgan Sonderegger,et al.  Boundary phenomena and variability in Japanese high vowel devoicing , 2018 .

[2]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  How autosegmental is phonology? , 2013 .

[3]  James White,et al.  Accounting for the learnability of saltation in phonological theory: A maximum entropy model with a P-map bias , 2017 .

[4]  Mark Irwin,et al.  A rendaku bibliography , 2016 .

[5]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Modeling Taiwanese speakers' knowledge of tone sandhi in reduplication , 2011 .

[6]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Testing Japanese loanword devoicing: Addressing task effects , 2013 .

[7]  Joe Pater,et al.  Gradient Exceptionality in Maximum Entropy Grammar with Lexically Specific Constraints , 2016 .

[8]  A. Cohn Is there Gradient Phonology , 2006 .

[9]  Jon Sprouse,et al.  A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowlege , 2007 .

[10]  Stephanie S. Shih Super Additive Similarity in DioulaTone Harmony , 2016 .

[11]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  Frequency biases in phonological variation , 2013 .

[12]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Japanese /r/ is not feature-less: A rejoinder to Labrune (2014) , 2015 .

[13]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Explaining sonority projection effects* , 2011, Phonology.

[14]  Frank Keller,et al.  Linear Optimality Theory as a Model of Gradience in Grammar , 2006 .

[15]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  The Central Question in Comparative Syntactic Metatheory , 2013 .

[16]  Aria Adli,et al.  Constraint cumulativity and gradience: Wh-scrambling in Persian , 2010 .

[17]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[18]  Frisch,et al.  Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon 16 , .

[19]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Consonant Cooccurrence Restrictions in Yamato Japanese , 2006 .

[20]  Stephanie S. Shih,et al.  Morphologically-conditioned tonotactics in multilevel Maximum Entropy grammar , 2016 .

[21]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[22]  John J. Ohala,et al.  On the Structure of Phonetic Categories , 1984 .

[23]  B. Hayes,et al.  Intersecting constraint families: An argument for harmonic grammar , 2017 .

[24]  B. Hayes Varieties of Noisy Harmonic Grammar , 2017 .

[25]  Stephanie S. Shih,et al.  Phonological conditions on variable adjective and noun word order in Tagalog , 2017 .

[26]  J. Berko The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[27]  Jon Sprouse Continuous Acceptability, Categorical Grammaticality, and Experimental Syntax , 2007, Biolinguistics.

[28]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Studies in the Psychological Correlates of the Sound System of American English , 1964 .

[29]  窪薗 晴夫 〈著書紹介〉 Handbooks of Japanese Language and Linguistics 2 Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology Haruo Kubozono (ed.) , 2015 .

[30]  G. Jäger,et al.  The winner takes it all — almost: cumulativity in grammatical variation , 2006 .

[31]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model , 2003 .

[32]  Prakash Mondal,et al.  Language and Linguistic Theory , 2014 .

[33]  A. Anttila Deriving Variation from Grammar , 1997 .

[34]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An introduction to Japanese phonology , 1987 .

[35]  R. Levy,et al.  Modeling OCP-Place in Amharic with the Maximum Entropy phonotactic learner , 2010 .

[36]  Larry M. Hyman,et al.  Identity Avoidance in Phonology and Morphology , 1999 .

[37]  Jon Sprouse Three open questions in experimental syntax , 2015 .

[38]  Outi Bat-El Selecting the best of the worst: the grammar of Hebrew blends , 1996, Phonology.

[39]  Laurence Labrune,et al.  The phonology of Japanese /r/: A panchronic account , 2013, Journal of East Asian Linguistics.

[40]  Laurence Labrune,et al.  Questioning the universality of the syllable: evidence from Japanese* , 2012, Phonology.

[41]  John Alderete,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology: Dissimilation in grammar and the lexicon , 2007 .

[42]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[43]  Carson T. Schütze The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[44]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[45]  Joe Pater Universal Grammar with Weighted Constraints , 2022 .

[46]  Ad Neeleman,et al.  Comments on Pullum , 2013 .

[47]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  Relating application frequency to morphological structure: the case of Tommo So vowel harmony* , 2016, Phonology.

[48]  Laurence Labrune,et al.  Patterns of Phonemic Preferences in Japanese non-headed Binary Compounds: What waa-puro, are-kore and mecha-kucha Have in Common , 2006 .

[49]  G. Booij,et al.  - [Review of: S.G. Lapointe, D.K. Brentari (1999) Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax] , 1999 .

[50]  G. Clements Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification , 1990 .

[51]  Stephen G Parker,et al.  Quantifying the sonority hierarchy , 2002 .

[52]  J. Pierrehumbert Stochastic phonology , 2001 .

[53]  J. Mehler,et al.  Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese , 1993 .

[54]  C. Wilson,et al.  Maxent grammars for the metrics of Shakespeare and Milton , 2012 .

[55]  D. Steriade,et al.  What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions , 2007, Cognition.

[56]  Kie Zuraw,et al.  A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution , 2010 .

[57]  A. Anttila Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations , 2002 .

[58]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[59]  Kie Zuraw,et al.  Patterned exceptions in phonology , 2000 .

[60]  I. Berent,et al.  Co-occurrence restrictions on identical consonants in the Hebrew lexicon: are they due to similarity? , 2003 .

[61]  Morris Halle,et al.  Knowledge Unlearned and Untaught: What Speakers Know about the Sounds of their Language , 2003 .

[62]  S. Mollin Revisiting binomial order in English: ordering constraints and reversibility1 , 2012, English Language and Linguistics.

[63]  Haruo Kubozono,et al.  The Mora and Syllable Structure in Japanese: Evidence from Speech Errors , 1989 .

[64]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of give in New Zealand and American English , 2008 .

[65]  Andrew Martin Grammars leak: Modeling how phonotactic generalizations interact within the grammar , 2011 .

[66]  Junko Ito,et al.  A prosodic theory of epenthesis , 1989 .

[67]  Kie Zuraw,et al.  Diverse repairs for multiple labial consonants , 2009 .

[68]  J. McCarthy OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination , 1986 .

[69]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[70]  T. Vance,et al.  The psychological status of a constraint on Japanese consonant alternation , 1980 .

[71]  B. Hayes,et al.  Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony , 2006, Phonology.

[72]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Similarity Avoidance and the OCP , 2004 .

[73]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  Rendaku and Identity Avoidance: Consonantal Identity and moraic Identity , 2016 .

[74]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Harmonic Grammar with linear programming: from linear systems to linguistic typology* , 2010, Phonology.

[75]  J. McCawley The phonological component of a grammar of Japanese , 1968 .

[76]  Joe Pater,et al.  Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-occurrence in Muna and Arabic , 2008 .

[77]  Emmerich Kelih,et al.  English Coordinate Constructions. A Processing Perspective on Constituent Order , 2016, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[78]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  On the nature of proper government , 1990 .

[79]  R. Levy,et al.  The Chicken or the Egg? A Probabilistic Analysis of English Binomials , 2006, Language.

[80]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[81]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Learning Phonology With Substantive Bias: An Experimental and Computational Study of Velar Palatalization , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[82]  B. Hayes,et al.  Natural and Unnatural Constraints in Hungarian Vowel Harmony , 2009 .

[83]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Gradience in grammar : generative perspectives , 2006 .

[84]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Gradience in Linguistic Data , 2005 .

[85]  Geoffrey K. Pullum Consigning Phenomena to Performance: A Response to Neeleman , 2013 .

[86]  Joe Pater,et al.  Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics , 2009, Cogn. Sci..