Decay of standing foams: drainage, coalescence and collapse

Abstract A summary of recent theoretical work on the decay of foams is presented. In a series of papers, we have proposed models for the drainage, coalescence and collapse of foams with time. Each of our papers dealt with a different aspect of foam decay and involved several assumptions. The fundamental equations, the assumptions involved and the results obtained are discussed in detail and presented within a unified framework. Film drainage is modeled using the Reynolds equation for flow between parallel circular disks and film rupture is assumed to occur when the film thickness falls below a certain critical thickness which corresponds to the maximum disjoining pressure. Fluid flow in the Plateau border channels is modeled using a Hagen-Poiseuille type flow in ducts with triangular cross-section. The foam is assumed to be composed of pentagonal dodecahedral bubbles and global conservation equations for the liquid, the gas and the surfactant are solved to obtain information about the state of the decaying foam as a function of time. Homogeneous foams produced by mixing and foams produced by bubbling (pneumatic foams) are considered. It is shown that a draining foam eventually arrives at a mechanical equilibrium when the opposing forces due to gravity and the Plateau-border suction gradient balance each other. The properties of the foam in this equilibrium state can be predicted from the surfactant and salt concentration in the foaming solution, the density of the liquid and the bubble radius. For homogeneous foams, it is possible to have conditions under which there is no drainage of liquid from the foam. There are three possible scenarios at equilibrium: separation of a single phase (separation of the continuous phase liquid by drainage or separation of the dispersed phase gas via collapse), separation of both phases (drainage and collapse occurs) or no phase separation (neither drainage nor collapse occurs). It is shown that the phase behavior depends on a single dimensionless group which is a measure of the relative magnitudes of the gravitational and capillary forces. A generalized phase diagram is presented which can be used to determine the phase behavior. For pneumatic foams, the effects of various system parameters such as the superficial gas velocity, the bubble size and the surfactant and salt concentrations on the rate of foam collapse and the evolution of liquid fraction profile are discussed. The steady state height attained by pneumatic foams when collapse occurs during generation is also evaluated. Bubble coalescence is assumed to occur due to the non-uniformity in the sizes of the films which constitute the faces of the polyhedral bubbles. This leads to a non-uniformity of film-drainage rates and hence of film thicknesses within any volume element in the foam. Smaller films drain faster and rupture earlier, causing the bubbles containing them to coalesce. This leads to a bubble size distribution in the foam, with the bubbles being larger in regions where greater coalescence has occurred. The formation of very stable Newton black films at high salt and surfactant concentrations is also explained.

[1]  T. Kondo,et al.  Approximate analytic expression for double-layer interaction at moderate potentials , 1988 .

[2]  J. Bourne,et al.  A study of disproportionation effects in semi-batch foams—I. Simulation of evolution of bubble size distribution , 1993 .

[3]  N. O. Clark,et al.  The degree of dispersion of the gas phase in foam , 1948 .

[4]  G. Narsimhan,et al.  Foam fractionation of proteins and enzymes: I. Applications. , 1990, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[5]  D. Weaire,et al.  Soap, cells and statistics – random patterns in two dimensions , 1984 .

[6]  Rajinder Kumar,et al.  Flow through a plateau border of cellular foam , 1982 .

[7]  P. G. de Gennes,et al.  Polymers at an interface; a simplified view , 1987 .

[8]  F. C. Goodrich,et al.  Surface viscosity of sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions with and without added dodecanol , 1975 .

[9]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Effect of counterion binding on micellization , 1988 .

[10]  R. Lemlich,et al.  Adsorptive bubble separation techniques , 1972 .

[11]  Ashutosh Sharma,et al.  Effects of surfactants on wave-induced drainage of foam and emulsion films , 1988 .

[12]  R. Lemlich Prediction of Changes in Bubble Size Distribution Due to Interbubble Gas Diffusion in Foam , 1978 .

[13]  Kartic C. Khilar,et al.  A network simulation for drainage of static foam columns , 1991 .

[14]  Eli Ruckenstein,et al.  Effect of surfactant and salt concentrations on the drainage and collapse of foams involving ionic surfactants , 1996 .

[15]  K. S. Gandhi,et al.  A model for static foam drainage , 1993 .

[16]  E. H. Lucassen-Reynders Anionic surfactants : physical chemistry of surfactant action , 1981 .

[17]  K. Koczó,et al.  Measurement of pressure distribution in the Plateau borders of fresh and aged foams , 1982 .

[18]  G. Narsimhan Maximum disjoining pressure in protein stabilized concentrated oil-in-water emulsions , 1992 .

[19]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Hydrodynamics, enrichment, and collapse in foams , 1986 .

[20]  H. M. Princen,et al.  Osmotic pressure of foams and highly concentrated emulsions. 2. Determination from the variation in volume fraction with height in an equilibrated column , 1987 .

[21]  Ganesan Narsimhan,et al.  A model for unsteady state drainage of a static foam , 1991 .

[22]  S. Ross,et al.  On the morphology of bubble clusters and polyhedral foams , 1986 .

[23]  E. Matijević,et al.  Preparation and growth kinetics of monodispersed ferric phosphate hydrosols , 1987 .

[24]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Foams and concentrated emulsions : dynamics and phase behavior , 1995 .

[25]  H. M. Princen,et al.  The surface area of Kelvin's minimal tetrakaidecahedron: The ideal foam cell (?) , 1987 .

[26]  David M. Pepper,et al.  Applications of Optical Phase Conjugation , 1986 .

[27]  P. A. Haas,et al.  A Model and Experimental Results for Drainage of Solution between Foam Bubbles , 1967 .

[28]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  On the coupling between the double layer and the solvent polarization fields , 1983 .

[29]  P. Wankat,et al.  Foam fractionation of globular proteins , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[30]  E. B. Matzke,et al.  The three-dimensional shape of bubbles in foam; an analysis of the role of surface forces in three-dimensional cell shape determination. , 1946, American journal of botany.

[31]  Robert Williams Space-Filling Polyhedron: Its Relation to Aggregates of Soap Bubbles, Plant Cells, and Metal Crystallites , 1968, Science.

[32]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Concentrated emulsion pathway to novel composite polymeric membranes and their use in pervaporation , 1995 .

[33]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Effect of bubble size distribution on the enrichment and collapse in foams , 1986 .

[34]  V. Fainerman Kinetics of adsorption of ionic surfactants at the solution—air interface and the nature of the adsorption barrier , 1991 .

[35]  Eli Ruckenstein,et al.  Drainage of a Standing Foam , 1995 .

[36]  Robert K. Prud'homme,et al.  Foams: Theory: Measurements: Applications , 1995 .

[37]  Robert Lemlich,et al.  A study of interstitial liquid flow in foam. Part I. Theoretical model and application to foam fractionation , 1965 .

[38]  J. Bourne,et al.  A study of disproportionation effects in semi-batch foams—II. Comparison between experiment and theory , 1993 .

[39]  Denis Weaire,et al.  The foam drainage equation , 1996 .

[40]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  The role of the polarization layers in hydration forces , 1983 .

[41]  D. Wasan,et al.  Equilibrium and dynamics of adsorption of surfactants at fluid-fluid interfaces , 1988 .

[42]  I. Ivanov,et al.  Theory of the critical thickness of rupture of thin liquid films , 1970 .

[43]  H. M. Princen Gravitational syneresis in foams and concentrated emulsions , 1990 .

[44]  E. Ruckenstein,et al.  Selective permeation through hydrophobic–hydrophilic membranes , 1989 .

[45]  Robert J. Germick,et al.  Experimental investigation of static drainage of protein stabilized foams — Comparison with model☆ , 1994 .

[46]  P. R. Garrett,et al.  Defoaming : Theory and Industrial Applications , 1993 .

[47]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[48]  A. Sheludko,et al.  Thin liquid films , 1967 .

[49]  A. Vrij,et al.  Possible mechanism for the spontaneous rupture of thin, free liquid films , 1966 .

[50]  H. M. Princen Highly concentrated emulsions. I. Cylindrical systems , 1979 .

[51]  Jean-Louis Salager,et al.  A new method to estimate the stability of short-life foams☆ , 1995 .

[52]  H. M. Princen Osmotic pressure of foams and highly concentrated emulsions. I. Theoretical considerations , 1986 .

[53]  G. Narsimhan,et al.  Foam fractionation of proteins and enzymes. II. Performance and modelling. , 1990, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[54]  B. Bijsterbosch,et al.  Streaming currents, streaming potentials and conductances of concentrated dispersions of negatively-charged, monodisperse polystyrene particles. Effect , 1987 .

[55]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Hydrodynamics of thin liquid films , 1974 .

[56]  J. Rijnbout,et al.  Calculations of van der Waals forces in thin liquid films using Lifshitz' theory , 1977 .