Hydropeaking indicators for characterization of the Upper-Rhone River in Switzerland

River channelization and the construction of high-head storage schemes have been the basis of agricultural and socio-economic development in many alpine regions. One example is the Upper-Rhone River in Switzerland. The Upper-Rhone’s morphology changed considerably between 1863 and 1960 as a result of two major channelizations and, from 1950 on, the construction of a large number of high-head storage hydropower schemes in the catchment. These modifications have brought large benefits to the local population, at the cost, however, of substantial disturbances in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems in and along the river. A primary factor behind these disturbances is the alteration of the natural flow regime, namely hydropeaking due to the operation of the high-head storage hydropower plants. For sustainable river-restoration projects on regulated rivers, scientists and engineers now widely accept the necessity of integrated management of the river. Different aspects such as river morphology, sediment management, water quality, temperature, and the naturally variable flow regime should be considered simultaneously. Mitigation of non-natural, sub-daily flow fluctuations due to hydropeaking is a crucial step in restoring natural flow regimes, but is especially challenging due to the economic constraints such mitigation places upon hydropower plants. With the goal of addressing this challenge, this paper proposes three indicators to describe the flow regime of rivers in alpine catchments with and without high-head storage hydropower plants. The indicators quantify: (1) the seasonal distribution and transfer of water, (2) sub-daily flow fluctuations, and (3) the intensity and frequency of flow changes. Indicators are evaluated in a case study of the Upper-Rhone River for pre- and post-impact situations, and the benefit of a multipurpose project reducing hydropeaking on hydrologic conditions is quantified. Furthermore, the paper explores the possibility of using these indicators to link aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem well being to their hydrology.

[1]  R. Zwahlen.  Identification, Assessment, and Mitigation of Environmental Impacts of Dam Projects , 2003 .

[2]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[3]  E. Hoehn,et al.  Assessing river-groundwater exchange in the regulated Rhone River (Switzerland) using stable isotopes and geochemical tracers , 2005 .

[4]  R. Bissoli,et al.  Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC. , 2008 .

[5]  Chemisch-physikalische Erhebungen,et al.  Methoden zur Untersuchung und Beurteilung der Fliessgewässer , 2010 .

[6]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Re‐establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[7]  B. Schädler.  Long water balance time series in the upper basins of four important rivers in Europe ― indicators for climatic changes? , 1987 .

[8]  M. Pellaud,et al.  Ecological response of a multi-purpose river development project using macro-invertebrates richness and fish habitat value , 2007 .

[9]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Green Electricity from Alpine Hydropower Plants , 2001, Renewable Energy.

[10]  F. Jordan.  Modèle de prévision et de gestion des crues , 2007 .

[11]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities: Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers , 2010 .

[12]  Anton Schleiss,et al.  Entwicklung des Abflussregimes der Rhone seit dem Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts, Nouveaux développements dans la gestion des crues - Conférence sur la recherche appliquée en relation avec la troisième correction du Rhône, Martigny, 9 juin , 2005 .

[13]  R. Céréghino,et al.  Influence of hydropeaking on the distribution and larval development of the plecoptera from a mountain stream , 1998 .

[14]  Janusz Dominik,et al.  Evolution of the Upper Rhone River discharge and suspended sediment load during the last 80 years and some implications for Lake Geneva , 2000, Aquatic Sciences.

[15]  Erik Bollaert,et al.  Potential synergies of multipurpose run-of-river hydroelectric powerplants , 2005 .

[16]  Jo Vegar Arnekleiv,et al.  Factors influencing stranding of wild juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid and frequent flow decreases in an artificial stream , 2003 .

[17]  R. Cushman.  Review of Ecological Effects of Rapidly Varying Flows Downstream from Hydroelectric Facilities , 1985 .

[18]  Spatio-temporal analysis of fish and their habitat: a case study on a highly degraded Swiss river system prior to extensive rehabilitation , 2007, Aquatic Sciences.

[19]  G. Petts,et al.  Fluvial hydrosystems: a management perspective , 1996 .

[20]  James A. Gore,et al.  The Restoration of rivers and streams : theories and experience , 1985 .

[21]  S. Saltveit,et al.  A review of the effect of river regulation on mayflies (Ephemeroptera) , 1989 .

[22]  J. Olden,et al.  Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes , 2003 .

[23]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[24]  A. Harby,et al.  Field experiments on stranding in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo Salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking , 2001 .

[25]  R. Peter Richards,et al.  A NEW FLASHINESS INDEX: CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATIONS TO MIDWESTERN RIVERS AND STREAMS 1 , 2004 .

[26]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[27]  Schweizerischer Wasserwirtschaftsverband,et al.  Wasser, Energie, Luft = Eau, énergie, air , 1976 .

[28]  M. Newson,et al.  The use of indices of flow variability in assessing the hydrological and instream habitat impacts of upland afforestation and drainage , 2002 .

[29]  Christer Nilsson,et al.  Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems , 2010 .

[30]  Anton Schleiss,et al.  River Rehabilitation through a Mutli-purpose Reservoir , 2007 .

[31]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[32]  P. Reichert,et al.  Modeling the effect of water diversion on the temperature of mountain streams , 2003 .

[33]  R. Vibert.  Répercussions piscicoles du fonctionnement par éclusées des usines hydro-électriques. , 1939 .

[34]  R. Sparks,et al.  The Natural Flow Regime , 2006 .

[35]  O. Bragg,et al.  DHRAM: a method for classifying river flow regime alterations for the EC Water Framework Directive , 2005 .

[36]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards , 2007 .

[37]  R. Céréghino,et al.  Influence of intermittent hydropeaking on the longitudinal zonation patterns of benthic invertebrates in a mountain stream , 2002 .

[38]  M. Pardé,et al.  Fleuves et rivières , 1933 .

[39]  E. Irwin,et al.  FLOW AND HABITAT EFFECTS ON JUVENILE FISH ABUNDANCE IN NATURAL AND ALTERED FLOW REGIMES , 2001 .

[40]  Anton Schleiss,et al.  L’hydraulique suisse: Un grand potentiel de croissance par l’augmentation de la puissance , 2007 .