Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Intraoperative Tibial Nerve Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials

To reveal the intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of single-trial somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP). SEP was recorded from 13 scoliosis patients during surgery. The power of SEP was estimated with least-square fitting to obtain the most accurate value and then to estimate the SNR of every trial of SEP. The SNR of cortical SEP from 13 cases presented individual difference among each other. According to the mean and standard deviation, the coefficients of variation of cortical and subcortical SEP were 4.2% and 23%, respectively. The SNR of SEP was estimated to be −24 ± 1 dB in cortical SEP and −22 ± 5 dB in subcortical SEP. The lowest SNR of individual case was found to be −30 dB in cortical SEP and −53 dB in subcortical SEP. The results showed that SNR of intraoperative SEP recordings varies from person to person and presents a higher variability in subcortical than that in cortical, with a broad range from −53 to −5 dB. The results from this study can be used to understand the nature of SEP signals, which could guide researchers and designers on SEP denoising method selection, extraction, and measurement, as well as equipment development.

[1]  Yong Hu,et al.  Fast extraction of Somatosensory Evoked Potential based on Second Order Blind Identification , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Guideline Eleven: Guidelines for Intraoperative Monitoring of Sensory Evoked Potentials , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[3]  Yong Hu,et al.  Adaptive signal enhancement of somatosensory evoked potential for spinal cord compression detection: an experimental study , 2005, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[4]  Yong Hu,et al.  Validation of an Adaptive Signal Enhancer in Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Monitoring , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[5]  Yong Hu,et al.  Multi-adaptive filtering technique for surface somatosensory evoked potentials processing. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Jorge Bohórquez,et al.  Signal to noise ratio analysis of maximum length sequence deconvolution of overlapping evoked potentials. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  L. Phillips,et al.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[8]  P. Anderson,et al.  Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: focus on cervical myelopathy and related issues. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  N.V. Thakor,et al.  Intraoperative neurological monitoring , 2006, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[10]  A R MacLennan,et al.  Reduction of evoked potential measurement time by a TMS320 based adaptive matched filter. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  N.V. Thakor,et al.  Adaptive estimation of latency changes in evoked potentials , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  G. Fein,et al.  Confidence intervals for the signal-to-noise ratio when a signal embedded in noise is observed over repeated trials , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  G. Zouridakis,et al.  Single-trial evoked potential estimation: Comparison between independent component analysis and wavelet denoising , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Jorge Bohórquez,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio and frequency analysis of continuous loop averaging deconvolution (CLAD) of overlapping evoked potentials. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  F H Chan,et al.  An enhanced approach to adaptive processing of the brain stem auditory evoked potential. , 1994, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[16]  B. Stigsby,et al.  Tibial somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring: Recommendations based on signal to noise ratio analysis of popliteal fossa, optimized P37, standard P37, and P31 potentials , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Y. Olsson,et al.  Spinal cord monitoring : basic principles, regeneration, pathophysiology, and clinical aspects , 1998 .

[18]  J C Leong,et al.  Effect of stimulation parameters on intraoperative spinal cord evoked potential monitoring. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[19]  B. Stigsby,et al.  A comparison between derivation optimization and Cz′–FPz for posterior tibial P37 somatosensory evoked potential intraoperative monitoring , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  M R Nuwer,et al.  Spinal cord monitoring with somatosensory techniques. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[21]  J. Auñón,et al.  Signal processing in evoked potential research: averaging and modeling. , 1981, Critical reviews in bioengineering.

[22]  F. K. Lam,et al.  Detection of brainstem auditory evoked potential by adaptive filtering , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[23]  T. Sloan,et al.  Anesthesia for Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring of the Spinal Cord , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.