Today’s healthcare system faces problems such as aging, a growth in age‐related illness and multi‐morbidity, a serious decrease of available personnel and a limited budget. The grand theme within healthcare is the need to do more with less. `eHealth’, the use of advanced information and communication technologies in healthcare, may contribute to the solution of these problems by supporting a better balance between self‐care and professional care. Yet, despite the large number of eHealth projects to date and the positive outcomes of evaluation studies, the actual take‐up of eHealth services is lower than expected. This thesis presents an investigation into the factors that are critical for the development of sustainable eHealth technologies. To this end, we evaluated various interactive health communication applications in primary care.
One of the main problems is that the development of healthcare technology is expert‐driven, resulting in technology that does not meet the users’ needs and that disregards the social‐cultural habits and the complexity of healthcare. In addition to this, eHealth interventions are often based on classic behavioral theories and medical models. They focus on rational decision‐making and discrete individual behavior change and neglect the very interdependencies between technology, care, context and communication. To ground eHealth, we formulated a number of key principles:
●
The development of eHealth technologies should be a process of value‐creation to match the technology with needs, motivations, incentives, profiles and contexts.
●
The development of eHealth technologies should be a participatory process of co‐creation in order to develop eHealth technologies that matter.
●
eHealth technologies should be persuasive to increase adherence.
These principles underpin our new holistic framework; the ceHRes (Center for eHealth Research) Roadmap. The ceHRes Roadmap aims to bring together the interdisciplinary fields of policy, research and practice by providing instruments related to participatory development and business modeling. Health 2.0 initiatives to advance sustainable healthcare technologies, the participation of users and stakeholders from different backgrounds and with different interests (political, medical, policy, commercial) are important for trust, commitment and creating ownership and for organizing the resources and capacities for the development of human‐centered and value‐driven eHealth technologies.
[1]
Göran Umefjord,et al.
Internet consultation in medicine : studies of a text-based Ask the doctor service
,
2006
.
[2]
Barak Gaster,et al.
Physicians’ use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication
,
2003,
Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[3]
Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.
,
2002,
JAMA.
[4]
Bradford W Hesse,et al.
Use of the Internet to Communicate with Health Care Providers in the United States: Estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS)
,
2007,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[5]
A. Sheikh,et al.
Email consultations in health care: 1—scope and effectiveness
,
2004,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[6]
C. Chronaki,et al.
eHealth Trends in Europe 2005-2007: A Population-Based Survey
,
2008,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[7]
Katarina Hamberg,et al.
Reasons for Consulting a Doctor on the Internet: Web Survey of Users of an Ask the Doctor Service
,
2003,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[8]
E. Seydel,et al.
The Contribution of Teleconsultation and Videoconferencing to Diabetes Care: A Systematic Literature Review
,
2007,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[9]
Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.
,
2002,
JAMA.
[10]
E. Seydel,et al.
Evaluation of Internet-Based Technology for Supporting Self-Care: Problems Encountered by Patients and Caregivers When Using Self-Care Applications
,
2008,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[11]
N. Menachemi,et al.
Physicians’ Use of Email With Patients: Factors Influencing Electronic Communication and Adherence to Best Practices
,
2006,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[12]
E. Murray,et al.
Internet Interventions for Long-Term Conditions: Patient and Caregiver Quality Criteria
,
2006,
Journal of medical Internet research.
[13]
Sarah M. Greene,et al.
Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care.
,
2005,
Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.
[14]
Steven J Katz,et al.
Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care.
,
2002,
The American journal of managed care.