Risk-Informed Design Changes in a Passive Decay Heat Removal System

Abstract The failure probability of a passive decay heat removal (DHR) system after a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) is evaluated as part of a risk-informed design process for a helium-cooled fast reactor. The system was modeled using RELAP5-3D. The epistemic uncertainties in input parameters as well as the epistemic model uncertainties in the code were assessed and propagated through the model using Latin hypercube sampling. The changes in the design that we investigated reduced the overall failure probability of the system by reducing the impact of the major contributor to the failure probability. Sensitivity analyses led to two unexpected results. First, the key factors affecting the system failure probability are the location of the thermal insulation (inside or outside the hot leg) and the uncertainty in the insulation thermal conductivity. Second, the heat transfer coefficient in the core is not as important as one might expect. Our results show that the heat transfer coefficient in the containment structures is more important. Different methods for sensitivity analysis were applied and gave consistent results. The calculated conditional (given a LOCA) failure probability of the passive DHR system was deemed to be unacceptable and led the Massachusetts Institute of Technology design team to adopt an active DHR system as the main mode of DHR for the gas-cooled fast reactor

[1]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  The Impact of Uncertainties on the Performance of Passive Systems , 2005 .

[2]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal , 1993 .

[3]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  Reliability evaluation of a natural circulation system , 2003 .

[4]  H. Schmitt,et al.  Status of design and testing of hot gas ducts , 1984 .

[5]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[6]  Pavel Hejzlar,et al.  Experimental and computational analysis of gas natural circulation loop , 2007 .

[7]  Alessandro Petruzzi,et al.  STATE OF THE ART IN USING BEST ESTIMATE CALCULATION TOOLS IN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY , 2006 .

[8]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Risk-informed design guidance for future reactor systems , 2005 .

[9]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  L. Burgazzi Reliability Evaluation of Passive Systems Through Functional Reliability Assessment , 2003 .

[11]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Extracting Risk Insights from Performance Assessments for High-Level Radioactive Waste Repositories , 2006 .

[12]  Hisashi Ninokata,et al.  Risk-informed design of IRIS using a level-1 probabilistic risk assessment from its conceptual design phase , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  G. Melese,et al.  Thermal and Flow Design of Helium-Cooled Reactors , 1985 .

[14]  F. D'Auria,et al.  Methodology for the reliability evaluation of a passive system and its integration into a Probabilistic Safety Assessment , 2005 .

[15]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Incorporating reliability analysis into the design of passive cooling systems with an application to a gas-cooled reactor , 2008 .