Image-based perceptual analysis of lit environments

Modern lighting systems typically provide a number of control parameters, e.g. colour and intensity, which allows nearly infinite possible configurations in one single room. The growing complexity of control makes it increasingly challenging for the user to configure the system and fully utilize the additional degrees of freedom. In contrast, an intuitive control interface takes into account the perceptual meaning of the lighting configurations. Unfortunately, collecting user ratings to construct perceptual models for lit spaces is cumbersome. To address this problem, we introduce an image-based mapping method that can rapidly evaluate the perceptual impression of lighting scenes using photographs or renderings. We discuss potential applications, guidelines and limitations of this method. In summary, we were able to closely approximate ratings-based mapping (normalized dissimilarity value <0.04). Among three dimensionality reduction methods, principal component analysis achieved the lowest dissimilarity and required the least images with a resolution as low as six by six pixels. Furthermore, simulations revealed that one perceptual model might suffice for the same type of offices. Offices of different types, on the other hand, require new mapping.

[1]  Mehlika Inanici,et al.  Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system , 2006 .

[2]  Christoph F. Reinhart,et al.  Experimental validation of ray tracing as a means of image-based visual discomfort prediction , 2017 .

[3]  J. Veitch Psychological Processes Influencing Lighting Quality , 2001 .

[4]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  Sensor-driven, human-in-the-loop lighting control , 2018 .

[5]  M. Ronnier Luo,et al.  A study of atmosphere perception of dynamic coloured light , 2014 .

[6]  Eric O. Postma,et al.  Dimensionality Reduction: A Comparative Review , 2008 .

[7]  Philip Dutré,et al.  Image-based lighting design , 2004 .

[8]  Barry Vercoe,et al.  Learning the meaning of music , 2005 .

[9]  Nathaniel L. Jones,et al.  VALIDATION OF GPU LIGHTING SIMULATION IN NATURALLY AND ARTIFICIALLY LIT SPACES , 2015 .

[10]  J. E. Flynn,et al.  Interim Study of Procedures for Investigating the Effect of Light on Impression and Behavior , 1973 .

[11]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  Automatic Lighting Design using a Perceptual Quality Metric , 2001, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[12]  D. Kendall A Survey of the Statistical Theory of Shape , 1989 .

[13]  H. Kaiser The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis , 1958 .

[14]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  A camera as a sensor for lighting and shading control , 2009 .

[15]  David V. Keyson,et al.  The case of sculpting atmospheres: towards design principles for expressive tangible interaction in control of ambient systems , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Kenneth J. Polakowski,et al.  A Design Approach to , 1989 .

[17]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  Comparing lighting quality evaluations of real scenes with those from high dynamic range and conventional images , 2010, TAP.

[18]  María Ángeles Martínez-Calvo,et al.  Reliable low-cost alternative for modeling and rendering 3D Objects in Engineering Graphics Education , 2017 .

[19]  Maryann Simmons,et al.  JPEG-HDR: a backwards-compatible, high dynamic range extension to JPEG , 2005, CIC.

[20]  Michael S. Mott,et al.  Illuminating the Effects of Dynamic Lighting on Student Learning , 2012 .

[21]  Mehlika Inanici Evalution of High Dynamic Range Image-Based Sky Models in Lighting Simulation , 2010 .

[22]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[24]  Raphaël Labayrade,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation of lighting installations taking into account user preferences – a pilot study , 2013 .