Active control for a benchmark building under wind excitations

Abstract The tall building proposed in the benchmark problem is a concrete office tower, which is wind sensitive due to its slenderness. The wind loads acting on the building are defined by the results of wind tunnel tests conducted at the Sydney University and an active mass driver can be designed for installation on the top floor in order to reduce the structural response under strong wind gusts. In this paper, the control strategy presented for the third generation benchmark control problem for wind-excited buildings (J. Eng. Mech. (1999), submitted for publication) is the simultaneous treatment of both H 2 performance criteria and H ∞ attenuation constraints that demonstrates design tradeoffs and can be applied to the AMD system based on acceleration feedbacks. This control problem can be formulated by linear matrix inequalities in terms of a common Lyapunov function. Solving linear matrix inequalities is a convex optimization problem and efficient interior-point algorithms are now available to solve this problem. Simulation and design results demonstrates that, decreasing H ∞ attenuation constraint can be used to reduce the structural response under wind excitations at the expense of increasing H 2 performance index.

[1]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  H∞ Active Seismic Response Control Using Static Output Feedback , 1996 .

[2]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Control of Tall Buildings in Along‐Wind Motion , 1983 .

[3]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  Reduced-order H∞ and LQR control for wind-excited tall buildings , 1998 .

[4]  J. N. Yang,et al.  EFFECT OF SYSTEM UNCERTAINTY ON CONTROL OF SEISMIC-EXCITED BUILDINGS , 1990 .

[5]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  Sliding mode control with compensator for wind and seismic response control , 1997 .

[6]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Frequency Domain Optimal Control of Wind‐Excited Buildings , 1992 .

[7]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Control of lateral-torsional motion of wind-excited buildings , 1985 .

[8]  Pascal Gahinet,et al.  H/sub /spl infin// design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control: part I—Active Mass Driver system , 1998 .

[10]  Henry T. Y. Yang,et al.  Simple ATMD Control Methodology for Tall Buildings Subject to Wind Loads , 1996 .

[11]  T. T. Soong,et al.  DESIGN OF AN ACTIVE MASS DAMPER FOR A TALL TV TOWER IN NANJING, CHINA , 1998 .

[12]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control : Part II : Active tendon system , 1998 .

[13]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Frequency domain optimal control strategies for aseismic protection , 1994 .

[14]  P. Gahinet,et al.  H∞ design with pole placement constraints: an LMI approach , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  H∞ Control for Seismic-Excited Buildings with Acceleration Feedback , 1995 .

[16]  Faryar Jabbari,et al.  Robust control techniques for buildings under earthquake excitation , 1994 .

[17]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Active control of wind excited buildings: A frequency domain based design approach , 1992 .

[18]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Acceleration Feedback Control of MDOF Structures , 1996 .

[19]  J. N. Yang,et al.  Active Control of Transmission Tower under Stochastic Wind , 1998 .

[20]  W. Chiang,et al.  LQG/LTR Control Methodology in Active Structural Control , 1998 .

[21]  Kemin Zhou,et al.  Mixed /spl Hscr//sub 2/ and /spl Hscr//sub /spl infin// performance objectives. II. Optimal control , 1994 .

[22]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[23]  E. Davison,et al.  On "A method for simplifying linear dynamic systems" , 1966 .