Emergent Stratification in Solid Tumors Selects for Reduced Cohesion of Tumor Cells: A Multi-Cell, Virtual-Tissue Model of Tumor Evolution Using CompuCell3D

Tumor cells and structure both evolve due to heritable variation of cell behaviors and selection over periods of weeks to years (somatic evolution). Micro-environmental factors exert selection pressures on tumor-cell behaviors, which influence both the rate and direction of evolution of specific behaviors, especially the development of tumor-cell aggression and resistance to chemotherapies. In this paper, we present, step-by-step, the development of a multi-cell, virtual-tissue model of tumor somatic evolution, simulated using the open-source CompuCell3D modeling environment. Our model includes essential cell behaviors, microenvironmental components and their interactions. Our model provides a platform for exploring selection pressures leading to the evolution of tumor-cell aggression, showing that emergent stratification into regions with different cell survival rates drives the evolution of less cohesive cells with lower levels of cadherins and higher levels of integrins. Such reduced cohesivity is a key hallmark in the progression of many types of solid tumors.

[1]  L. Hlatky,et al.  Joint oxygen‐glucose deprivation as the cause of necrosis in a tumor analog , 1988, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  Ignacio Ramis-Conde,et al.  Multi-scale modelling of cancer cell intravasation: the role of cadherins in metastasis , 2009, Physical biology.

[3]  W. Lieberthal,et al.  Graded ATP depletion can cause necrosis or apoptosis of cultured mouse proximal tubular cells. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[4]  A. Anderson,et al.  Hybrid models of tumor growth , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[5]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. , 1963, Science.

[6]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of Tissues by Dissociated Cells , 1963 .

[7]  Mark A. J. Chaplain,et al.  Integrating Intracellular Dynamics Using CompuCell3D and Bionetsolver: Applications to Multiscale Modelling of Cancer Cell Growth and Invasion , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Roeland M. H. Merks,et al.  Contact-Inhibited Chemotaxis in De Novo and Sprouting Blood-Vessel Growth , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  A. Anderson,et al.  A hybrid mathematical model of solid tumour invasion: the importance of cell adhesion , 2005 .

[10]  J. Segall,et al.  Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Q. Liu,et al.  Hypoxia suppresses E-cadherin and enhances matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression favoring esophageal carcinoma migration and invasion via hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha activation. , 2013, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

[13]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Adhesion Failures Determine the Pattern of Choroidal Neovascularization in the Eye: A Computer Simulation Study , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  C. Kenific,et al.  Autophagy and metastasis: another double-edged sword. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[15]  A. Deutsch,et al.  Studying the emergence of invasiveness in tumours using game theory , 2008, 0810.4724.

[16]  P Hahnfeldt,et al.  Migration rules: tumours are conglomerates of self-metastases , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  Abbas Shirinifard,et al.  Multi-scale modeling of tissues using CompuCell3D. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[18]  Roeland M. H. Merks,et al.  Dynamic mechanisms of blood vessel growth , 2006, Nonlinearity.

[19]  A. Anderson,et al.  Front Instabilities and Invasiveness of Simulated Avascular Tumors , 2009, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[20]  Maciej Swat,et al.  Adhesion between cells, diffusion of growth factors, and elasticity of the AER produce the paddle shape of the chick limb. , 2006, Physica A.

[21]  Roeland M. H. Merks,et al.  Cell elongation is key to in silico replication of in vitro vasculogenesis and subsequent remodeling. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[22]  J. Glazier,et al.  Front Instabilities and Invasiveness of Simulated 3D Avascular Tumors , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  J. Glazier,et al.  3D Multi-Cell Simulation of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis , 2009, PloS one.

[24]  Alexander R. A. Anderson,et al.  Single-Cell-Based Models in Biology and Medicine , 2007 .

[25]  A. Berruti,et al.  Metronomic Therapy Concepts in the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma , 2011, Hormones & cancer.

[26]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[27]  Ignacio Ramis-Conde,et al.  Modeling the influence of the E-cadherin-beta-catenin pathway in cancer cell invasion: a multiscale approach. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[28]  James A. Glazier,et al.  A Multi-cell, Multi-scale Model of Vertebrate Segmentation and Somite Formation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  A. Anderson,et al.  A hybrid mathematical model of solid tumour invasion: the importance of cell adhesion. , 2005, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[30]  James A. Glazier,et al.  Magnetization to Morphogenesis: A Brief History of the Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg Model , 2007 .

[31]  J. Segall,et al.  The great escape: when cancer cells hijack the genes for chemotaxis and motility. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.