Feedback Strategies for BCI Based Stroke Rehabilitation: Evaluation of Different Approaches

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) allow human communication without using the brain’s normal output pathways. A BCI is a tool that converts signals recorded from the user’s brain into control signals for different applications. Most BCI systems are based on one of the following methods: P300; steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP); and event-related desynchronization (ERD). Electroencephalog-ram (EEG) activity is recorded non-invasively using active or passive electrodes mounted on the human scalp. In recent years, a variety of different BCI applications for communication and control were developed. A promising new idea is to utilize BCI systems as tools for brain rehabilitation. The BCI can detect the user’s movement intention and provide online feedback for rehabilitation sessions. In many cases, stroke patients can re-train their brains to restore effective movement. Previous work has continued to show that higher density electrode systems can reveal subtleties of brain dynamics that are not obvious with only few electrodes. This paper tries to optimize current BCI strategies for stroke rehabilitation by comparing conventional bar feedback (bFD) to immersive 3-D virtual reality feedback (VRFB).

[1]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Luis Montesano,et al.  Continuous decoding of intention to move from contralesional hemisphere brain oscillations in severely affected chronic stroke patients , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  V. Caggiano,et al.  Proprioceptive Feedback and Brain Computer Interface (BCI) Based Neuroprostheses , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  A clinical study of motor imagery-based brain-computer interface for upper limb robotic rehabilitation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Neurofeedback Training for BCI Control , 2009 .

[10]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: Revolutionizing Human-Computer Interaction , 2013 .

[11]  J. Ushiba,et al.  Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and action observation: Modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.