Data envelopment analysis: theory and applications

The common weights approach is one of the most prominent methods to further prioritize the subset of DEA efficient units. This approach can be modeled as a multiobjective problem, where one seeks for a common set of weights that locates the efficiency ratio of each unit as close as possible to the target score of 1. In such a setting, different metrics can be applied to measure the distance of the efficiency ratios from target, such as the L1, L2 and L∞. When L1 and L2 metrics are used the models derived are non-linear. In case of the L∞ metric, the problem can be heuristically solved by the bisection method and a series of linear programs. We investigate in this paper the ability of genetic algorithms to solve the problem for estimating efficiency scores, by using an evolutionary optimization method based on a variant of the Nondominated Sorted Genetic Algorithm.

[1]  Tomoe Entani,et al.  Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  A. F. Simões,et al.  Energy Sources and Global Climate Change: The Brazilian Case , 2008 .

[3]  Quinn Weninger,et al.  Estimating multiproduct costs when some outputs are not produced , 2003 .

[4]  M. B. M. de Koster,et al.  On using DEA for benchmarking container terminals , 2009 .

[5]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities , 2003 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Brasil. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia Emissões de dióxido de carbono por queima de combustíveis: abordagem top-down: relatórios de referência: primeiro inventário brasileiro de emissões antrópicas de gases de efeito estufa , 2006 .

[8]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[10]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[11]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  The Environmental Importance of Energy Use in Chemical Production , 2011 .

[12]  Jon Magnussen,et al.  Productivity growth in outpatient child and adolescent mental health services: the impact of case-mix adjustment. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[13]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The dominance of inefficiencies over scale and product mix economies in banking , 1991 .

[14]  W. Scott,et al.  Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives , 2006 .

[15]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology: A Context Within a 50-Year Retrospective of OR/MS , 2005, Interfaces.

[16]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Mathematical models in the social sciences , 1964 .

[17]  Mei-Hui Wang,et al.  A study on the persistence of Farrell's efficiency measure under a dynamic framework , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure: Comment , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[20]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Egoist's dilemma with interval data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[21]  Eliane Gonçalves Gomes,et al.  Análise de envoltória de dados no estudo da eficiência e dos benchmarks para companhias aéreas brasileiras , 2003 .

[22]  G. C. Vitti,et al.  Planejamento, estratégias de manejo e nutrição da cultura de cana-de-açúcar , 2002 .

[23]  Barbara A. Kitchenham,et al.  The question of scale economies in software - why cannot researchers agree? , 2002, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[24]  Cecilio Mar-Molinero,et al.  Social efficiency in microfinance institutions , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[25]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Measures in DEA with an Application to the Malmquist Index , 2000 .

[26]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Scale Economies in New Software Development , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[27]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  A conceptual model for quality of service in the supply chain , 2006 .

[28]  M. Hassan,et al.  Financial deregulation and total factor productivity change: An empirical study of Turkish commercial banks , 2003 .

[29]  Wirtschaftsforschung Halle,et al.  Quality of Service, Efficiency, and Scale in Network Industries: An Analysis of European Electricity Distribution , 2005 .

[30]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2008, Oper. Res..

[31]  M. Farrell,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVITY EFFICIENCY , 1957 .

[32]  Vlatko Čerić,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict , 1991 .

[33]  S. Ray,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND EFFICIENCY CHANGE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: COMMENT , 1997 .

[34]  Ralph A. Luken,et al.  Industrial transformation and sustainable development in developing countries , 2011 .

[35]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies , 1997 .

[36]  Jim Davies,et al.  Economies and diseconomies of scale in software development , 2011, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[37]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[38]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[39]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[40]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[41]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Incorporating Value Judgments in DEA , 2004 .

[42]  Guillermo Owen,et al.  On the core of linear production games , 1975, Math. Program..

[43]  Masatoshi Sakawa,et al.  Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multiobjective Optimization , 1993 .

[44]  Kai Petersen,et al.  Measuring and predicting software productivity: A systematic map and review , 2011, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[45]  Marno Verbeek,et al.  A Guide to Modern Econometrics , 2000 .

[46]  Eliane Gonçalves Gomes,et al.  Redistribuição de inputs e outputs em modelos de análise envoltória de dados com ganhos de soma zero , 2004 .

[47]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[48]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  The Appropriateness of the Poolability Assumption for Multiproduct Technologies: Evidence from the English Water and Sewerage Utilities , 2011 .

[49]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Toward A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism , 2005 .

[50]  W. Cooper,et al.  Idea and Ar-Idea: Models for Dealing with Imprecise Data in Dea , 1999 .

[51]  Shawna Grosskopf,et al.  Public provision and performance : contributions from efficiency and productivity measurement , 2000 .

[52]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Decomposing school and school-type efficiency , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  An occurrence of multiple projections in DEA-based measurement of technical efficiency: Theoretical comparison among DEA models from desirable properties , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  J. Sengupta A fuzzy systems approach in data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[55]  S. Malmquist Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[56]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches , 2007 .

[57]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[58]  Alan Bond,et al.  Capturing the implications of land use change in Brazil through environmental assessment: Time for a strategic approach? , 2011 .

[59]  Carlos Eduardo Gasparini,et al.  Relative deficit of health services in Brazilian states and regions , 2004 .

[60]  Antonio F. Amores,et al.  New approach for the assignment of new European agricultural subsidies using scores from data envelopment analysis: Application to olive-growing farms in Andalusia (Spain) , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[61]  Sergio L. Schmukler,et al.  Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: Financial Liberalization and Stock Market Cycles , 2007 .

[62]  K. J. Rogers,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations , 2008 .

[63]  R. Naylor,et al.  Sugar and ethanol production as a rural development strategy in Brazil: evidence from the state of São Paulo. , 2011 .

[64]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  The Impact of Financial Liberalization on the Performance of Thai Banks , 1998 .

[65]  W. Greene On the estimation of a flexible frontier production model , 1980 .

[66]  Michael R Chernick,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers , 2007 .

[67]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[68]  Li Jiang,et al.  Third-party Logistics Provider Efficiency Evaluation Based on Information Entropy-DEA Model , 2008, 2008 International Seminar on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering.

[69]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1985 .

[70]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[71]  Richard C. Morey,et al.  Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multi-horizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking , 1999 .

[72]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Statistical inference for aggregates of Farrell-type efficiencies , 2007 .

[73]  Gad Vitner,et al.  MPCS: Multidimensional Project Control System , 2004 .

[74]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Efficiency measurement in the stochastic frontier model , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[75]  Roberto Fiszman,et al.  [The use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for Brazilian teaching hospitals' evaluation]. , 2007, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[76]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[77]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in DEA , 2011 .

[78]  William W. Sharkey The Theory of Natural Monopoly , 1982 .

[79]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Production Efficiency , 1957 .

[80]  Fernando Carvalho de Almeida,et al.  Modelos de previsão de insolvência utilizando a análise por envoltória de dados: aplicação a empresas brasileiras , 2007 .

[81]  John C. Panzar,et al.  TESTING FOR "MONOPOLY" EQUILIBRIUM* , 1987 .

[82]  Bolin Liu,et al.  Efficiency Measurement of Logistics Public Companies Basing on the Modified DEA Model , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security.

[83]  Vladimir E. Krivonozhko,et al.  Returns-to-scale properties in DEA models: the fundamental role of interior points , 2012 .

[84]  Dorothea Greiling,et al.  Performance measurement: a remedy for increasing the efficiency of public services? , 2006 .

[85]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases , 1992 .

[86]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[87]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[88]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[89]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[90]  Sally Coleman Selden,et al.  Testing a Multi-Dimensional Model of Organizational Performance: Prospects and Problems , 2004 .

[91]  Thomas G. Weyman-Jones,et al.  COST FUNCTIONS AND COST EFFICIENCY IN ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH , 1996 .

[92]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evidence on economies of scale in software development , 1994, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[93]  Raúl Pérez-Reyes,et al.  Measuring efficiency and productivity change (PTF) in the Peruvian electricity distribution companies after reforms , 2009 .

[94]  Luiz Biondi Neto,et al.  ISYDS- Integrated System for Decision Support (SIAD - Sistema Integrado de Apoio a Decisão): a software package for data envelopment analysis model , 2005 .

[95]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Egoist's Dilemma: A DEA Game , 2003 .

[96]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[97]  Carlos Alvares da Silva Campos Neto,et al.  Portos brasileiros 2009: ranking, área de influência, porte e valor agregado médio dos produtos movimentados , 2009 .

[98]  Hokey Min,et al.  Evaluating the comparative efficiency of Chinese third‐party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis , 2008 .

[99]  Andrew Street,et al.  The market for efficiency analysis of health care organisations. , 2006, Health economics.

[100]  Emili Tortosa Ausina,et al.  Productivity growth in European banking , 2005 .

[101]  Borge Hess,et al.  Efficiency analysis of East and West German electricity distribution companies – Do the “Ossis” really beat the “Wessis”? , 2007 .

[102]  Fabiano Ionta Andrade Silva,et al.  Analysis of the energy intensity evolution in the Brazilian industrial sector—1995 to 2005 , 2009 .

[103]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Do Strategic Groups Differ in Reputation? , 1999 .

[104]  Francisco Javier Ramos-Real,et al.  Firm size and productivity. Evidence from the electricity distribution industry in Brazil , 2011 .

[105]  Yossi Hadad,et al.  Determinants of healthcare system’s efficiency in OECD countries , 2013, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[106]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  The use of third party logistics services: a Malaysian perspective , 2003 .

[107]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[108]  Hasan Bal,et al.  Improving the discrimination power and weights dispersion in the data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[109]  C. Lovell,et al.  Deregulation and productivity decline: the case of Spanish savings banks , 1996 .

[110]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[111]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[112]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience , 1996 .

[113]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[114]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[115]  M. Weaver,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in Vietnamese hospitals. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[116]  R. Banker Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[117]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[118]  Jos L. T. Blank,et al.  Non-maximizing output behavior for firms with a cost-constrained technology , 2009 .

[119]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[120]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Returns to scale in different DEA models , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[121]  D. Griffel Linear programming 2: Theory and extensions , by G. B. Dantzig and M. N. Thapa. Pp. 408. £50.00. 2003 ISBN 0 387 00834 9 (Springer). , 2004, The Mathematical Gazette.

[122]  Hamilton C. D. Silva,et al.  Cost Efficiency in Periodic Tariff Reviews : The Reference Utility Approach and the Role of Interest Groups ♣ , 2011 .

[123]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[124]  Livia Silva Freitas,et al.  Balanço das emissões de gases do efeito estufa (GEE) na cadeia completa de produção do biodiesel de soja , 2010 .

[125]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[126]  João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Mello,et al.  Eficiência técnica das companhias aéreas brasileiras: um estudo com análise envoltória de dados e conjuntos nebulosos , 2011 .

[127]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking , 2003 .

[128]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[129]  Steffen Flessa,et al.  Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis , 2011, Health economics review.

[130]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Farrell revisited–Visualizing properties of DEA production frontiers , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[131]  Ali Jamshidi,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of Sasobit® to reduce required heat energy and CO2 emission in the asphalt industry , 2010 .

[132]  Walter Briec,et al.  Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[133]  W. Greene,et al.  Application of Panel Data Models in Benchmarking Analysis of the Electricity Distribution Sector , 2006 .

[134]  Aaron J. Shenhar Reinventando gerenciamento de projetos: a abordagem diamante ao crescimento e inovação bem-sucedidos , 2010 .

[135]  Catherine A. Sugar,et al.  Finding the Number of Clusters in a Dataset , 2003 .

[136]  Hokey Min,et al.  Benchmarking the operational efficiency of third party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[137]  Per J. Agrell,et al.  DEA and Dynamic Yardstick Competition in Scandinavian Electricity Distribution , 2005 .

[138]  Gulgun Kayakutlu,et al.  Assessing performance factors for a 3PL in a value chain , 2011 .

[139]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Determinantes da eficiência de escala no setor brasileiro de operadores logísticos , 2010 .

[140]  M. Farsi,et al.  Regulation and Measuring Cost-Efficiency with Panel Data Models: Application to Electricity Distribution Utilities , 2004 .

[141]  Jarmo Vakkuri,et al.  Research Techniques and Their Use in Managing Non-Profit Organisations - an Illustration of DEA Analysis in NPO Environments , 2003 .

[142]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[143]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Modeling Operational Processes And Measuring Productivity , 2008 .

[144]  J. Goldemberg Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future , 2007, Science.

[145]  R. Prud’homme The dangers of decentralization , 1995 .

[146]  Mariana Iootty,et al.  The evolution and main determinants of productivity in Brazilian electricity distribution 1998-2005: an empirical analysis , 2009 .

[147]  H. O. Fried,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002 .

[148]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  ASYMPTOTICS AND CONSISTENT BOOTSTRAPS FOR DEA ESTIMATORS IN NONPARAMETRIC FRONTIER MODELS , 2008, Econometric Theory.

[149]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Quality of service, efficiency and scale in network industries: an analysis of European electricity distribution , 2009 .

[150]  Shai Rozenes,et al.  Multidimensional project control system , 2004 .

[151]  Gavin Mooney The Need for a New Paradigm , 2009 .

[152]  Rien Wagenvoort,et al.  Department of Economics Econometrics Working Paper Ewp0503 a Recursive Thick Frontier Approach to Estimating Production Efficiency , 2022 .

[153]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[154]  José Luiz Ioriatti Demattê,et al.  Recuperação e manutenção da fertilidade dos solos , 2005 .

[155]  F. Førsund,et al.  Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries , 1993 .

[156]  D. Nutter,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the production of fluid milk. , 2011, Advances in food and nutrition research.

[157]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[158]  Suely de Fátima Ramos Silveira,et al.  Emancipação municipal e eficiência nos gastos públicos para geração de bem-estar nos municípios mineiros de pequeno porte , 2011 .

[159]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Evaluating the performance of Brazilian university hospitals , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[160]  Bruce A. Blonigen,et al.  Port Efficiency and Trade Flows , 2007 .

[161]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[162]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Sustainable cement production—present and future , 2011 .

[163]  Alexandre Marinho,et al.  ESTUDO DE EFICIÊNCIA EM ALGUNS HOSPITAIS PÚBLICOS E PRIVADOS COM A GERAÇÃO DE RANKINGS , 2001 .

[164]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model: A range-adjusted measure approach , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[165]  W. Greene,et al.  Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[166]  Ichiro Nishizaki,et al.  Solutions based on fuzzy goals in fuzzy linear programming games , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[167]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[168]  J. Mingers,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited : problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict , 1989 .

[169]  Sahand Daneshvar,et al.  The minimal cost-benefit ratio and maximal benefit-cost ratio , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Engineering System Management and Applications.

[170]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[171]  S. Fleury,et al.  Reshaping health care in Latin America : a comparative analysis of health care reform in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico , 2000 .

[172]  Sérgio Luis da Silva,et al.  Gestão de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma referência para a melhoria do processo , 2006 .