OBJECTIVES
Terminology and knowledge resources are essential components of interoperability among disparate systems. This paper evaluates whether names and relationships needed in biomedical informatics are present in the UMLS.
METHODS
Terms for five broad categories of concepts were extracted from LocusLink and mapped to the UMLS Metathesausus. Relationships between gene products and the other four categories (phenotype, molecular function, biological process, and cellular component) were searched for in the Metathesaurus. All gene products in the Gene Ontology database were also mapped to the UMLS in order to evaluate its global coverage of the domain.
RESULTS
The coverage of concepts ranged from 2% (gene product symbols) to 44% (molecular functions). The coverage of relationships ranged from 60% for Gene product-Biological process to 83% for Gene product-Molecular function.
DISCUSSION
Terminology and ontology issues are discussed, as well as the need for integrating additional resources to the UMLS.
[1]
James Pustejovsky,et al.
Type Coercion and Lexical Selection
,
1993
.
[2]
Carol Friedman,et al.
Representing genomic knowledge in the UMLS semantic network
,
1999,
AMIA.
[3]
Carole A. Goble,et al.
Ontology-based Knowledge Representation for Bioinformatics
,
2000,
Briefings Bioinform..
[4]
J. Blake,et al.
Creating the Gene Ontology Resource : Design and Implementation The Gene Ontology Consortium 2
,
2001
.
[5]
Steffen Schulze-Kremer,et al.
Ontologies for Molecular Biology
,
2001,
Electron. Trans. Artif. Intell..
[6]
Olivier Bodenreider,et al.
From Phenotype to Genotype: Experiences in Navigating the Available Information Resources
,
2002,
AMIA.
[7]
Olivier Bodenreider,et al.
Representation of roles in biomedical ontologies: a case study in functional genomics
,
2002,
AMIA.