Unsupervised damage clustering in complex aeronautical composite structures monitored by Lamb waves: An inductive approach

Abstract Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), i.e. the action of monitoring structures in real-time and in an automated manner, is a major challenge in several industrial fields such as aeronautic. SHM is by nature a very high dimensional data-driven problem that possesses several specificities when addressed as a machine learning problem. First of all data in damaged cases are rare and very costly as the generation of damaged data is not always possible and simulations are not reliable especially when dealing with complex structures. SHM is thus by nature an unsupervised problem. Furthermore, any incoming sample should be instantaneously clustered and handcrafted damage indexes are commonly used as a first dimension reduction step due to large datasets to be processed. As a consequence, unsupervised dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques that project very high dimensional data into a two or three-dimensional space (such as t-SNE or UMAP) are very appealing in such a context. However, these methods suffer from one major drawback which is that they are unable to cluster any unknown incoming sample. To solve this we propose to add inductive abilities to these well know methods by associating their projection bases with Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). The resulting DNNs are then able to cluster any incoming unknown samples. Based on those tools, a SHM methodology allowing for unsupervised damage clustering with dimensionality reduction is presented here. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the method, results of damage classification on large experimental data sets coming from complex aeronautical composite structures monitored through Lamb waves are shown. Furthermore, several DR techniques have been benchmarked and recommendations are derived. It is demonstrated that the use of raw Lamb wave signals instead of the associated damage indexes is more effective. This non-intuitive result helps to reduce the gap between laboratory research and the actual start-up of SHM activities in industrial applications.

[1]  Aboul Ella Hassanien,et al.  Linear discriminant analysis: A detailed tutorial , 2017, AI Commun..

[2]  Mahjoub El Mountassir,et al.  A Semi-Supervised Based K-Means Algorithm for Optimal Guided Waves Structural Health Monitoring: A Case Study , 2019, Inventions.

[3]  Mark K. Hinders,et al.  Multiclass feature selection using computational homology for Lamb wave–based damage characterization , 2014 .

[4]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  Structural health monitoring feature design by genetic programming , 2014 .

[5]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Inspection and Structural Health Monitoring techniques for Concentrated Solar Power plants , 2016 .

[6]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[7]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[9]  Keith Worden,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING METHODOLOGY: PART II. NOVELTY DETECTION ON A GNAT AIRCRAFT , 2003 .

[10]  Miguel Angel Torres-Arredondo,et al.  Investigation of an expert health monitoring system for aeronautical structures based on pattern recognition and acousto-ultrasonics , 2015 .

[11]  Viorica Patraucean,et al.  gvnn: Neural Network Library for Geometric Computer Vision , 2016, ECCV Workshops.

[12]  T B Sorensen,et al.  [Fibre optic]. , 1975, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[13]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[14]  Lin Ye,et al.  Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review , 2006 .

[15]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[16]  Shulin Wang,et al.  Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[17]  Aytaç Altan,et al.  Real-Time Control based on NARX Neural Network of Hexarotor UAV with Load Transporting System for Path Tracking , 2018, 2018 6th International Conference on Control Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT).

[18]  Laurens van der Maaten,et al.  Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Mark K. Hinders,et al.  Intelligent Structural Health Monitoring with Ultrasonic Lamb Waves , 2020 .

[20]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[21]  Didier Maquin,et al.  Feature selection techniques for identifying the most relevant damage indices in SHM using Guided Waves , 2016 .

[22]  Elmar Eisemann,et al.  Approximated and User Steerable tSNE for Progressive Visual Analytics , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Aytaç Altan,et al.  THE EFFECT OF KERNEL VALUES IN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE TO FORECASTING PERFORMANCE OF FINANCIAL TIME SERIES , 2019 .

[24]  Chiwoo Park,et al.  Aggressive Data Reduction for Damage Detection in Structural Health Monitoring , 2010 .

[25]  Francesc Pozo,et al.  Detection of structural changes through principal component analysis and multivariate statistical inference , 2016 .

[26]  P. A. Gardner,et al.  Foundations of population-based SHM, Part I: Homogeneous populations and forms , 2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[27]  W. Torgerson Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method , 1952 .

[28]  Mira Mitra,et al.  Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review , 2016 .

[29]  Jie Wu,et al.  Dependable Structural Health Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[30]  Elizabeth A. Holm,et al.  Computer Vision and Machine Learning for Autonomous Characterization of AM Powder Feedstocks , 2016, JOM.

[31]  Yi Wang,et al.  Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring Approach Using Guided Lamb Wave Responses , 2020 .

[32]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring , 2007 .

[33]  Alexandru Telea,et al.  Deep learning multidimensional projections , 2019, Inf. Vis..

[34]  Marc Rébillat,et al.  A general Bayesian framework for ellipse-based and hyperbola-based damage localization in anisotropic composite plates , 2016 .

[35]  Simone Frintrop,et al.  Traditional saliency reloaded: A good old model in new shape , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[36]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Mapping a Manifold of Perceptual Observations , 1997, NIPS.

[37]  Keith Worden,et al.  Novelty detection and dimension reduction via guided ultrasonic waves: Damage monitoring of scarf repairs in composite laminates , 2016 .

[38]  Ferat Sahin,et al.  A survey on feature selection methods , 2014, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[39]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Applying robust variant of Principal Component Analysis as a damage detector in the presence of outliers , 2015 .

[40]  Stéphane Marchand-Maillet,et al.  Inductive t-SNE via deep learning to visualize multi-label images , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[41]  Keith Worden,et al.  Foundations of population-based SHM, Part III: Heterogeneous populations – Mapping and transfer , 2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[42]  Emmanuel Lizé Détection d'endommagement sans état de référence et estimation de la température pour le contrôle santé intégré de structures composites par ondes guidées , 2018 .

[43]  Aytaç Altan,et al.  Recognition Model for Solar Radiation Time Series based on Random Forest with Feature Selection Approach , 2019, 2019 11th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO).

[44]  José Rodellar,et al.  Data-driven multivariate algorithms for damage detection and identification: Evaluation and comparison , 2014 .

[45]  T. Caliński,et al.  A dendrite method for cluster analysis , 1974 .

[46]  Raffaella Di Sante,et al.  Fibre Optic Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Aircraft Composite Structures: Recent Advances and Applications , 2015, Sensors.

[47]  Stelios D. Bekiros,et al.  Digital currency forecasting with chaotic meta-heuristic bio-inspired signal processing techniques , 2019, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals.

[48]  N. Dervilis,et al.  Foundations of Population-based SHM, Part II: Heterogeneous populations – Graphs, networks, and communities , 2021, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[49]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Stochastic Neighbor Embedding , 2002, NIPS.

[50]  Leland McInnes,et al.  UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction , 2018, ArXiv.

[51]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Damage classification in structural health monitoring using principal component analysis and self‐organizing maps , 2013 .

[52]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[53]  Marc Rébillat,et al.  A data-driven temperature compensation approach for Structural Health Monitoring using Lamb waves , 2016 .

[54]  Z. Su,et al.  Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves , 2009 .

[55]  Wiesław J Staszewski,et al.  Time–frequency and time–scale analyses for structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[56]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  A study of two unsupervised data driven statistical methodologies for detecting and classifying damages in structural health monitoring , 2013 .