Exploring and Yet Failing Less: Learning from Exploration, Exploitation and Human Capital in R&D

Exploration is both a risky activity and a key ingredient in the strategy of firms that strive for radical innovations. This paper investigates a dual facet of the exploratory component of R&D activities with regards to innovation failures: while exploration increases firms’ exposure to failure, it also provides learning opportunities to curve down innovation failures. This paper contributes to organizational learning and innovation management research by proposing that firms’ valuable learning does not automatically follow from exploration, but instead,it is conditional on reaching a threshold level of exploratory R&D activities. It is also proposed that valuable learning from exploration is enhanced when exploration is combined with other complementary sources oflearning: exploitation and human capital. Our baseline results point to an inverted U-shaped relation: investment in exploratory activities increases the rate of failure in innovation up to a point beyond which exploration is found to decrease the rate of failure. We observe this inverted U-shaped relationship both at the conception and development phases of the innovation process. We also show that firms’ commitments to exploitative R&D activities and the availability of human capital act as relevant moderators: they contribute to speed the organisational learning process enhanced by exploration and result in lowering the probability of innovation failure at the downstream and conception phases, respectively.

[1]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[2]  A. Barge-Gil,et al.  R&D and productivity: In search of complementarity between research and development activities , 2013 .

[3]  M. Savona,et al.  What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers , 2012 .

[4]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[5]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[6]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[8]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[9]  Francesca Gino,et al.  Why leaders don't learn from success. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[10]  R. Calantone,et al.  Are Really New Product Development Projects Harder to Shut Down , 1998 .

[11]  Maarten L. Buis,et al.  Stata Tip 87: Interpretation of Interactions in Nonlinear Models , 2010 .

[12]  Arpan Jani,et al.  Escalation of commitment in troubled IT projects: Influence of project risk factors and self-efficacy on the perception of risk and the commitment to a failing project , 2011 .

[13]  C. Pérez,et al.  Innovation as Growth Policy: The Challenge for Europe , 2014 .

[14]  Hanna Hottenrott,et al.  Industrial Research Versus Development Investment: The Implications of Financial Constraints , 2009 .

[15]  Jean-Jacques Paul,et al.  The recruitment of researchers and the organisation of scientific activity in industry , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[16]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[17]  Steve Sorrell,et al.  Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches , 2015 .

[18]  P. Davidsson,et al.  The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs , 2000 .

[19]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The management of technological innovation : strategy and practice , 2008 .

[20]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing , 1980 .

[21]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[22]  W. Zangwill,et al.  Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve , 1998 .

[23]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[24]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Learning from Extreme Performance Experience: The Impact of Success and Recovery Experience , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Mariana Mazzucato,et al.  Beyond market failures: the market creating and shaping roles of state investment banks , 2014 .

[26]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[27]  J. March Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence , 2006 .

[28]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Project failure from corporate entrepreneurship: Managing the grief process , 2009 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[30]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[31]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[32]  R. Nelson The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency , 1982 .

[33]  Patrick Sevestre,et al.  Where there is a will, there is a way? Assessing the impact of obstacles to innovation , 2013 .

[34]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve , 2005 .

[35]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them , 2010 .

[36]  S. Sorrell Energy Substitution, Technical Change and Rebound Effects , 2014 .

[37]  Peter M. Madsen,et al.  Failing to Learn? The Effects of Failure and Success on Organizational Learning in the Global Orbital Launch Vehicle Industry , 2010 .

[38]  Alessandro Sterlacchini,et al.  Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance , 1999 .

[39]  S Thomke,et al.  Enlightened experimentation. The new imperative for innovation. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[40]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  R&D project termination decisions: Processes, communication, and personnel changes , 1996 .

[41]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[42]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Vicarious Learning from the Failures and Near-Failures of Others: Evidence from the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2007 .

[43]  Alex Coad,et al.  How Satisfied are the Self-Employed? A Life Domain View , 2016 .

[44]  C. Rammer,et al.  Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: substituting technology by management in SMEs , 2009 .

[45]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D , 2014 .

[46]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[47]  N. Rosenberg Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[48]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Francisco Mas-Verdú,et al.  Which firms want PhDs? An analysis of the determinants of the demand , 2012 .

[50]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[51]  Benn Lawson,et al.  Innovator'S Dilemma , 2015 .

[52]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Science Business: The Promise, the Reality, and the Future of Biotech , 2006 .

[53]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[54]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .