Headform and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Interaction: Contact Pressure Simulation and Validation

This article presents a computational and experimental study of contact pressure between six N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and five newly developed digital headforms (small, medium, large, long/narrow, and short/wide). Contact interaction is simulated using the finite element method and validated by experiments using a pressure mapping system. The headform model has multiple layers: a skin layer, muscle layer, fatty tissue layer, and bone layer. Each headform is divided into five parts (two parts for the cheeks, one part for the upper forehead, one part for the chin, and one part for the back side of the head). Each respirator model comprises multiple layers and two straps. The simulation process has two stages for each respirator/headform combination. The first stage is to wrap the straps around the back of the headform and pull the respirator away from the face. The second stage is to release the respirator so that the respirator moves toward the face. Strap forces and contact interactions are generated between the respirators and the headforms. Meanwhile, a real-time surface pressure mapping system is used to record the pressures at six key locations to validate the computational results. There is a strong correlation between computational and experimental results (R2 = 0.88). By comparing the pressure values from simulations and experiments, we have validated the simulation models.

[1]  Jingzhou Yang,et al.  Simulating the Interaction between a Respirator and a Headform Using LS-DYNA , 2009 .

[2]  P Pasanen,et al.  Evaluation of comfort and seal leakages of several respirators used in agricultural work. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  H Shahnavaz,et al.  Ergonomics aspects of personal protective equipment: its use in industrially developing countries. , 1988, Journal of human ergology.

[4]  Bruce H Bitterman Application of Finite Element Modeling and Analysis to the Design of Positive Pressure Oxygen Masks , 1991 .

[5]  T K Hodous,et al.  Work tolerance and subjective responses to wearing protective clothing and respirators during physical work. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[6]  Y Payan,et al.  The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Bruce Bradtmiller,et al.  Head-and-Face Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Respirator Users , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[8]  Jingzhou Yang,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of important parameters affecting contact pressure between a respirator and a headform , 2011 .

[9]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Anatomy-based human face reconstruction using multi-layer deformation , 2005 .

[10]  Ziqing Zhuang,et al.  A New Approach to Developing Digital 3-D Headforms , 2008 .

[11]  Edoardo Mazza,et al.  Physically Based Finite Element Model of the Face , 2008, ISBMS.

[12]  F. Duck Physical properties of tissue , 1990 .

[13]  Kathryn S. Cohen,et al.  Relationship of Protective Mask Seal Pressure to Fit Factor and Head Harness Strap Stretch , 1999 .

[14]  Michael S Bergman,et al.  Infrared imaging for leak detection of N95 filtering facepiece respirators: a pilot study. , 2011, American journal of industrial medicine.

[15]  Jingzhou Yang,et al.  Contact Pressure Study of N95 Filtering Face-piece Respirators Using Finite Element Method , 2010 .

[16]  F Akbar-Khanzadeh Factors contributing to discomfort or dissatisfaction as a result of wearing personal protective equipment. , 1998, Journal of human ergology.

[17]  P Harber,et al.  Subjective tolerance of respirator loads and its relationship to physiological effects. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[18]  Yohan Payan,et al.  Biomechanical models to simulate consequences of maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Comptes rendus biologies.

[19]  Dino Piccione,et al.  Modeling the Interface Between a Respirator and the Human Face. , 1997 .

[20]  Stacey Benson,et al.  Digital 3-D headforms with facial features representative of the current US workforce , 2010, Ergonomics.

[21]  Keith Waters,et al.  Physical model of facial tissue and muscle articulation derived from computer tomography data , 1992, Other Conferences.

[22]  Evgeny Gladilin,et al.  Biomechanical Modeling of Soft Tissue and Facial Expressions for Craniofacial Surgery Planning , 2003 .

[23]  M. Sato [Mechanical properties of living tissues]. , 1986, Iyo denshi to seitai kogaku. Japanese journal of medical electronics and biological engineering.

[24]  F Akbar-Khanzadeh,et al.  Comfort of personal protective equipment. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  M. Kawai,et al.  Age‐related changes in the elastic properties and thickness of human facial skin , 1994, The British journal of dermatology.

[26]  J Guttmann,et al.  Respiratory comfort and breathing pattern during volume proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation: A study on volunteers with artificially reduced compliance , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[27]  A. Ogale,et al.  Tensile Viscoelastic Properties of Spunbonded Nonwoven Polypropylene Backing , 1991 .

[28]  W A Burgess,et al.  Respirator comfort: subjective response to force applied to the face. , 1966, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[29]  Yohan Payan,et al.  Orbital and maxillofacial computer aided surgery: patient-specific finite element models to predict surgical outcomes , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[30]  S. Cowin,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[31]  R Kikinis,et al.  Deformable modeling of facial tissue for craniofacial surgery simulation. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[32]  Ziqing Zhuang,et al.  The Effect of Subject Characteristics and Respirator Features on Respirator Fit , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[33]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[34]  Bruce Bradtmiller,et al.  New Respirator Fit Test Panels Representing the Current U.S. Civilian Work Force , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[35]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  Modeling the biomechanics of the mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[37]  Kumar Mithraratne,et al.  Multilayer Soft Tissue Continuum Model: Towards Realistic Simulation of Facial Expressions , 2009 .