Anomia is simply a reflection of semantic and phonological impairments: Evidence from a case-series study

A number of recent studies have attempted to explain patterns of normal and impaired performance in a variety of different language tasks with respect to the same set of ''primary'' systems rather than resorting to explanations in terms of dedicated processes, specific to each and every language activity. In this study we consider whether the same approach can be taken to patterns of impaired single-word speech production. Specifically, using cross-sectional data from 21 aphasic patients we tested the hypothesis that the degree and nature of anomia can be explained using independently derived measures of the integrity of the patients' phonological and semantic/conceptual representations, without postulating a role for an abstract lexical level of representation. At a global level, we found that these two measures explained 55-80%of the variance in the patients' naming accuracy, a figure which approaches that found for test reliability. There was also a close fit between observed and expected naming accuracy for all individual patients. The same two measures also predicted the rate of different types of anomic error across individuals. Measures intended to assess lexical integrity did not explain any additional, unique variance in naming accuracy. We discuss these results and the theoretical approach with respect to existing theories of speech production, and evaluate the case-series methodology itself, both as a tool to reveal the underpinnings of speech production and as a neuropsychological technique in general.

[1]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  T. Shallice.  From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure: Converging Operations: Specific Syndromes and Evidence from Normal Subjects , 1988 .

[3]  J. Hodges,et al.  Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[5]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Lexical access in speech production , 2000 .

[6]  M. Farah.  Phonological Dyslexia: Loss of a Reading-specific Component of the Cognitive Architecture? , 1996 .

[7]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Selective disorders of reading? , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic Constraints , 1997, Science.

[9]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Interpreting a case of Japanese phonological alexia: the key is in phonology , 1996 .

[10]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  A distinctive case of word meaning deafness , 1996 .

[12]  P. Eling.  Current perspectives in dysphasia, Stanton Newman, Ruth Epstein (Eds.). Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, Melbourne and New York (1985), 236, ISBN: 0 443 03039 1 , 1986 .

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999 .

[14]  S. Franklin.  Dissociations in auditory word comprehension; evidence from 9 fluent aphasic patients , 1999 .

[15]  S. Franklin.  Dissociations in auditory word comprehension; evidence from nine fluent aphasic patients , 1989 .

[16]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[17]  Lyndsey Nickels,et al.  Spoken Word Production and Its Breakdown In Aphasia , 1997 .

[18]  M. Farah.  Phonological Dyslexia: Loss of a Reading-specific Component of the Cognitive Architecture? , 1996 .

[19]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  J. Algeo.  Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language , 2000 .

[21]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Neural organization and plasticity of language , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Single Word Production in Nonfluent Progressive Aphasia , 1998, Brain and Language.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[25]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[26]  W. Levelt.  Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations , 1992, Cognition.

[27]  K. Patterson,et al.  The impact of semantic memory impairment on spelling: evidence from semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Hodges,et al.  Progressive pure anomia: Insufficient activation of phonology by meaning , 1995 .

[31]  Daniel Bub,et al.  On the Status of Object Concepts in Aphasia , 1997, Brain and Language.

[32]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA) , 1996 .

[33]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Systematicity and specialization in semantics , 1999 .

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[35]  J. Hodges,et al.  Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  David C. Plaut,et al.  The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production ; A distributed connectionist approach , 1998 .

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  No Right to Speak? The Relationship between Object Naming and Semantic Impairment:Neuropsychological Evidence and a Computational Model , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Matthew A Lambon Ralph,et al.  Classical anomia: a neuropsychological perspective on speech production , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Dyslexia Matthew,et al.  Word Meaning Blindness: A New Form of Acquired , 1996 .

[40]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming , 1991 .

[41]  N. L. Bowles,et al.  The importance of word-initial phonology: Error patterns in prolonged naming efforts by aphasic patients , 1997, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[42]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  The Origins of Formal Paraphasias in Aphasics' Picture Naming , 1997, Brain and Language.

[43]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Distributed versus Localist Representations: Evidence from a Study of Item Consistency in a Case of Classical Anomia , 1998, Brain and Language.

[44]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[45]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Kim S. Graham,et al.  The relationship between comprehension and oral reading in progressive fluent aphasia , 1995 .

[47]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[48]  K. Sage,et al.  WORD MEANING BLINDNESS REVISITED. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[49]  B. Butterworth,et al.  The semantic deficit in aphasia: The relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  S. Franklin.  A distinctive case of word meaning deafness , 1996 .

[51]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Induction of First-Order Decision Lists: Results on Learning the Past Tense of English Verbs , 1995, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[52]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[53]  D. Plaut,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[54]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[55]  R. Friedman.  Recovery from Deep Alexia to Phonological Alexia: Points on a Continuum , 1996, Brain and Language.

[56]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[59]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[60]  G. Dell,et al.  Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .

[61]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[62]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Disorders of phonological encoding , 1992, Cognition.

[63]  K Bock,et al.  The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[64]  A. Meyer.  Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives , 1992, Cognition.