The globalization of operations in Eastern and Western countries: Unpacking the relationship between national and organizational culture and its impact on manufacturing performance

Abstract Understanding national and organizational culture becomes increasingly important in the era of transnational manufacturing. As the world becomes flat and boundaries break down, manufacturers need to understand the proper role of culture in order to obtain competitive advantage. Thus, the current study conducts a multilevel investigation of the impact of eight national and organizational culture dimensions (according to GLOBE framework) on manufacturing performance. An ANOVA comparison of 189 manufacturing plants between Eastern (Japan and South Korea) and Western (Germany, United States, Finland, and Sweden) countries indicates that organizational culture inside plants differs in three dimensions (power distance, future orientation, and performance orientation). Hierarchical Linear Modeling analysis further suggests that organizational culture has more of an effect on manufacturing performance than national culture or the fit between them. In addition, Country Developmental Indexes, both Economic and Infrastructural, do not impact manufacturing performance, reinforcing our conclusion about the weak influence of the national level factors on manufacturing performance. In an era of globalization, these results have practical implications for organizations expanding across national boundaries by developing an internal organizational culture consistent with high performance manufacturing.

[1]  John Naisbitt,et al.  Global Paradox: The Bigger the World Econmy, the More Powerful Its Smallest Players , 1993 .

[2]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[3]  Suresh Gopalan,et al.  Do Organizational Cultures Replicate National Cultures? Isomorphism, Rejection and Reciprocal Opposition in the Corporate Values of Three Countries , 2003 .

[4]  Simcha Ronen,et al.  Structure and Importance of Work Goals Among Managers in the People's Republic of China , 1987 .

[5]  Mark L. Davison,et al.  Using Hierarchical Linear Models to Examine Moderator Effects: Person-by-Organization Interactions , 2002 .

[6]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective , 2003 .

[7]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain , 1996 .

[8]  J. Child,et al.  Organization and managerial roles in British and West German companies: an examination of the culture-free thesis , 2003 .

[9]  S. Schneider.  National vs. corporate culture: Implications for human resource management , 1988 .

[10]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND AN ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT , 1994 .

[11]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, Barriers, and New Developments , 1999 .

[12]  D. Rousseau.  Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[13]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2004 .

[14]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[15]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[16]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Decision Sciences Research in China: A Critical Review and Research Agenda - Foundations and Overview , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[17]  S. Snell,et al.  Strategic Compensation for Integrated Manufacturing: The Moderating Effects of Jobs and Organizational Inertia , 1994 .

[18]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[19]  Peter B. Smith.  When elephants fight, the grass gets trampled: the GLOBE and Hofstede projects , 2006 .

[20]  J. Hackman.  Learning more by crossing levels: evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras , 2003 .

[21]  Eitan Naveh,et al.  Innovation and Attention to Detail in the Quality Improvement Paradigm , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[23]  Karen L. Newman,et al.  Culture and Congruence: The Fit Between Management Practices and National Culture , 1996 .

[24]  A. Raveh,et al.  National and corporate cultural fit in mergers/acquisition: an exploratory study , 1996 .

[25]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[26]  D. Hickson,et al.  Organizations alike and unlike : international and interinstitutional studies in the sociology of organizations , 1980 .

[27]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata , 2005 .

[28]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. , 1981 .

[29]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[30]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory , 2008 .

[31]  Sameer Prasad,et al.  International operations management research , 2000 .

[32]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Towards a Theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High‐Tech Manufacturing , 2004 .

[33]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[34]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[35]  Mark Pagell,et al.  The importance of national culture in operations management research , 2005 .

[36]  R. Kanungo,et al.  Organizational Culture and Human Resource Management Practices , 1999 .

[37]  Mariann Jelinek,et al.  Is “organization culture” culture bound? , 1986 .

[38]  R. Schroeder,et al.  The crucial interrelationship between manufacturing strategy and organizational culture , 1995 .

[39]  James R. Evans,et al.  The management and control of quality , 1989 .

[40]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[41]  J. Edwards.  Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. , 2002 .

[42]  K. Sivakumar,et al.  National Culture and New Product Development: An Integrative Review , 1996 .

[43]  R. Schroeder,et al.  Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[44]  L. Mosley,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[45]  K. Ferdows.  MADE IN THE WORLD: THE GLOBAL SPREAD OF PRODUCTION , 1997 .

[46]  A. Jaeger,et al.  Organization Development and National Culture: Where's the Fit? , 1986 .

[47]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  High performance manufacturing : global perspectives , 2001 .

[48]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy , 2000 .

[49]  David A. Ralston,et al.  The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values : a study of the United States , Russia , Japan , and China , 2005 .

[50]  Rohit Verma,et al.  History of offshoring knowledge services , 2008 .

[51]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[52]  Paul L. Koopman,et al.  The influence of national culture on organizational culture: A comparative study between 10 countries , 1994 .

[53]  Mary B. Teagarden,et al.  Converging on IHRM Best Practices: Lessons Learned from a Globally Distributed Consortium on Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[54]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[55]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  TQM across multiple countries: Convergence hypothesis versus national specificity arguments , 2005 .

[56]  Rohit Verma,et al.  MULTIPLE RATERS IN SURVEY‐BASED OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND TUTORIAL , 2000 .

[57]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[58]  B. McSweeney.  Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith - a Failure of Analysis , 2002 .

[59]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Handbook of Metrics for Research in Operations Management: Multi-item Measurement Scales and Objective Items , 2007 .

[60]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context: A study of national culture , 2006 .

[61]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[62]  Ali Dastmalchian,et al.  The interplay between organizational and national cultures: a comparison of organizational practices in Canada and South Korea using the Competing Values Framework , 2000 .