Searching for a universal fouling indicator for membrane bioreactors

A B S T R A C T Numerous papers have been published studying the causes of fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) and searching for a universal fouling indicator. Unfortunately, as these studies were performed using various set-ups and operating conditions (different membranes, sludge retention time (SRT), hydraulic conditions and diverse feed wastewaters, etc.), the results in terms of fouling rates and the infl uence of individual parameters rarely match up. In order to obtain a signifi cant database of comparable results from different plants, an intensive monitoring campaign of four MBR systems started in 2007 in Berlin. In these units, 14 parameters were monitored on a weekly basis over 10 months to characterise the mixed liquor and the corresponding permeability, including the novel parameter transparent exopolymer particles (TEP), which represent a specially sticky fraction of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). By performing statistical analyses it was demonstrated that there is no unique fouling indicator, and origins of fouling must be searched in the combination of several parameters using multivariable analysis. Applying a multiple regression the critical fl ux values could be correlated with four parameters (temperature, nitrate, bound and soluble TEP) measured in the activated sludge for 95% of the data.

[1]  Simon Judd,et al.  Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2003 .

[2]  B Lesjean,et al.  Monitoring of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) and correlation with other fouling indicators. , 2008, Water Science and Technology.

[3]  George Nakhla,et al.  Comparative studies on membrane fouling between two membrane-based biological nutrient removal systems , 2009 .

[4]  Anja Drews,et al.  Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures , 2010 .

[5]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[6]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[7]  Thomas Wintgens,et al.  The importance of liquid phase analyses to understand fouling in membrane assisted activated sludge processes—six case studies of different European research groups , 2005 .

[8]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP , 2008 .

[9]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[10]  K. Keiding,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin , 1996 .

[11]  G Amy,et al.  Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[12]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[13]  T. D. L. Torre,et al.  Filtration charaterization methods in MBR systems: A practical comparison , 2009 .

[14]  Mehmet Kitis,et al.  Impacts of membrane flux enhancers on activated sludge respiration and nutrient removal in MBRs. , 2009, Water research.

[15]  A. Drews,et al.  Impact of ambient conditions on SMP elimination and rejection in MBRs. , 2007, Water research.

[16]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors , 2002 .