Project Risk Differences between Virtual and Co-Located Teams

Although software development projects increasingly incorporate virtual team members, most research performed on project risk to date was conducted on projects using traditional co-located teams incorporating face-to-face communications. This paper identifies a set of risk factors particularly important to virtual teams but rarely discussed. Results, from a survey of over 150 Information Technology (IT) practitioners, are based on actual project experiences. Out of fifty-five risk factors included in the survey, seven factors showed significant differences in effect on the successful completion of projects based on project environment. Notably, the results showed a significantly greater impact for all seven risk factors in virtual software development environments, when compared to development using traditional face-to-face teams. This increased risk is termed the Magnifier Effect. Anticipating the Magnifier Effect can allow practitioners who are managing projects in a virtual environment to anticipate and mitigate the added risks of using virtual software development teams.

[1]  Mark Keil,et al.  Software project risks and their effect on outcomes , 2004, CACM.

[2]  Kimberly Dunn,et al.  Future Profitability, Operating Cash Flows, and Market Valuations Associated with Offshoring Arrangements of Technology Jobs , 2009, J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Can absence make a team grow stronger? , 2004, Harvard business review.

[4]  B. Wong,et al.  Relationship Issues in Global Software Development Enterprises , 2008 .

[5]  Kimberly A. Furumo,et al.  Virtual vs. face-to-face teams: deadbeats, deserters, and other considerations , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[6]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Exhuming it Projects from Their Graves: An Analysis of Eight Failure Cases and Their Risk Factors , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  It Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Professionals Perspective , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[9]  Rob Oyung,et al.  Working Virtually: Challenges of Virtual Teams , 2005 .

[10]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A framework for identifying software project risks , 1998, CACM.

[11]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[12]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  A Study of Requirements Negotiations in Virtual Project Teams , 2000, ECIS.

[13]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Rules of Virtual Groups , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Chetan S. Sankar,et al.  Information Technology Outsourcing and Virtual Team , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[15]  B. Boehm Software risk management: principles and practices , 1991, IEEE Software.

[16]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[17]  Line Dubé,et al.  Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Linda Wallace The Development of an Instrument toMeasure Software Project Risk , 1997 .

[19]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  The Virtual Edge: Embracing Technology for Distributed Project Team Success , 1998 .

[20]  RivardSuzanne,et al.  Toward an assessment of software development risk , 1993 .

[21]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .