This paper analyzes the relationship between Compromise Programming and a close relative called Composite Programming that is based on the use of composite metrics. More specifically, it focuses on the possibility that the results of Compromise Programming are equivalent to those obtained with a particular case of Composite Programming in which a linear combination between the two bounds of the compromise set is established. Several situations, depending on the number of criteria involved and the mathematical structure of the efficient set, are studied. The most relevant result is obtained when two criteria are involved and the efficient boundary is defined by a continuously differentiable and strictly quasi-convex function. In this case, it is possible to find a unique equivalent value of the control parameter in Composite Programming for each metric in Compromise Programming. It is remarked that this particular case is very relevant in many economic scenarios. On the other hand, it turns out that the equivalence between both approaches cannot be extended to the case with more than two criteria.
[1]
P. Yu.
A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems
,
1973
.
[2]
M. Freimer,et al.
Some New Results on Compromise Solutions for Group Decision Problems
,
1976
.
[3]
F. Blasco,et al.
On the Monotonicity of the Compromise Set in Multicriteria Problems
,
1999
.
[4]
András Bárdossy,et al.
Network design for the spatial estimation of environmental variables
,
1983
.
[5]
F J André,et al.
Using compromise programming for macroeconomic policy making in a general equilibrium framework: theory and application to the Spanish economy
,
2008,
J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[6]
Hirotaka Nakayama.
Trade-off analysis using parametric optimization techniques
,
1992
.
[7]
Milan Zelany,et al.
A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal
,
1974,
Comput. Oper. Res..