Linking a Learning Progression for Natural Selection to Teachers' Enactment of Formative Assessment.

Learning progressions, or representations of how student ideas develop in a domain, hold promise as tools to support teachers' formative assessment practices. The ideas represented in a learning progression might help teachers to identify and make inferences about evidence collected of student thinking, necessary precursors to modifying instruction to help students advance in their learning. The study reported in this article took the novel approach of using a learning progression for natural selection to support teachers' enactment of formative assessment. Sources of data include interviews and videotapes of six high school biology teachers leading assessment conversations around the same formative assessment questions. Results indicate that while teachers picked out and made inferences about student ideas related to the learning progression during assessment conversations, they did not use all parts of the learning progression in the same way. Furthermore, several of the teachers seemed to use the learning progressions simply as catalogs of misconceptions to be “squashed” rather than drawing upon the developmental affordances offered by a learning progression. Results are framed in terms of the utility of learning progressions as supports for classroom practice. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 1181–1210, 2012

[1]  R. Good,et al.  Students' Conceptual Ecologies and the Process of Conceptual Change in Evolution. , 1995 .

[2]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[3]  Gayle A. Buck,et al.  Making formative assessment discernable to pre‐service teachers of science , 2010 .

[4]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[5]  N. Songer,et al.  Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions. , 2012 .

[6]  Aaron Rogat,et al.  Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform. CPRE Research Report # RR-63. , 2009 .

[7]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Reflections on Learning Progressions , 2012 .

[8]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[9]  Barbara P. Heath,et al.  The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards‐based instruction , 2011 .

[10]  Shawn Y. Stevens,et al.  Developing a Hypothetical Multi-Dimensional Learning Progression for the Nature of Matter. , 2009 .

[11]  Savitha Moorthy,et al.  Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science , 2011 .

[12]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[13]  Z. Dagher,et al.  Students' perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory , 2005 .

[14]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education , 1999 .

[15]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[16]  H. Borko Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[17]  R. Bennett Formative assessment: a critical review , 2011 .

[18]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[19]  Medha Tare,et al.  A Conceptual Guide to Natural History Museum Visitors’ Understanding of Evolution , 2009 .

[20]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New Teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions , 2002 .

[21]  Mayr,et al.  This is Biology , 1998 .

[22]  Minsu Ha,et al.  Item Feature Effects in Evolution Assessment. , 2011 .

[23]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[24]  L. Shepard Formative assessment: Caveat emptor , 2005 .

[25]  A. Odom,et al.  Development and application of a two‐tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction , 1995 .

[26]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[27]  David Hammer,et al.  The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment , 2011 .

[28]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Tracing a Prospective Learning Progression for Developing Understanding of Evolution , 2005 .

[29]  J. Dewey,et al.  The school and society ; and, The child and the curriculum , 1990 .

[30]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Preservice elementary teachers' views of their students' prior knowledge of science , 2008 .

[31]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Aligning Academic Task and Participation Status through Revoicing: Analysis of a Classroom Discourse Strategy , 1993 .

[32]  Miki K. Tomita,et al.  On the Impact of Curriculum-Embedded Formative Assessment on Learning: A Collaboration between Curriculum and Assessment Developers , 2008 .

[33]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes , 2011 .

[34]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  FOCUS ARTICLE: Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory , 2006 .

[35]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[36]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[37]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs , 2007 .

[39]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution , 1986 .

[40]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers' Professional Vision , 2009 .

[41]  Amelia Wenk Gotwals,et al.  Learning Progressions in Science , 2012 .

[42]  K. Boersma,et al.  Reinventing Natural Selection , 2006 .

[43]  Erin Marie Furtak,et al.  On the Fidelity of Implementing Embedded Formative Assessments and Its Relation to Student Learning , 2008 .

[44]  Ravit Golan Duncan,et al.  A Learning Progression for Deepening Students' Understandings of Modern Genetics across the 5th-10th Grades. , 2009 .

[45]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts , 2010 .

[46]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Naive Explanations of Natural Selection , 1998 .

[47]  J. Little Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform , 1993 .

[48]  E. Furtak,et al.  Learning Progressions To Support Ambitious Teaching Practices , 2012 .

[49]  J. Myron Atkin Designing Everyday Assessment in the Science Classroom , 2005 .

[50]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[51]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[52]  David Stroupe,et al.  Proposing a Core Set of Instructional Practices and Tools for Teachers of Science , 2012 .

[53]  Philip Johnson,et al.  The Emergence of a Learning Progression in Middle School Chemistry , 2011 .

[54]  P. Black,et al.  Developing the theory of formative assessment , 2009 .

[55]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[56]  R. Duschl,et al.  Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. , 1997 .

[57]  G. Norman,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection , 2002 .

[58]  Mark W. Aulls Contributions of classroom discourse to what content students learn during curriculum enactment. , 1998 .

[59]  P. Black,et al.  Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. , 2001 .

[60]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[61]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth‐based perspective , 2010 .