Numerical anchors and their strong effects on software development effort estimates

[1]  Magne Jørgensen Better Selection of Software Providers through Trialsourcing , 2016, IEEE Software.

[2]  David D. Loschelder,et al.  “€14,875?!”: Precision Boosts the Anchoring Potency of First Offers , 2014 .

[3]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project , 2014 .

[4]  G. Cumming,et al.  The New Statistics , 2014, Psychological science.

[5]  N. Schwarz,et al.  The power of precise numbers: A conversational logic analysis , 2013 .

[6]  M. Mason,et al.  Precise offers are potent anchors: Conciliatory counteroffers and attributions of knowledge in negotiations , 2013 .

[7]  Magne Jorgensen Relative Estimation of Software Development Effort: It Matters with What and How You Compare , 2013, IEEE Software.

[8]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  First impressions in software development effort estimation: Easy to create and difficult to neutralize , 2012, EASE.

[9]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  Software Development Estimation Biases: The Role of Interdependence , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[10]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  From origami to software development: a review of studies on judgment-based predictions of performance time. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  The Impact of Irrelevant and Misleading Information on Software Development Effort Estimates: A Randomized Controlled Field Experiment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[12]  A. Furnham,et al.  A literature review of the anchoring effect , 2011 .

[13]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making , 2010 .

[14]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  Avoiding Irrelevant and Misleading Information When Estimating Development Effort , 2008, IEEE Software.

[15]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  Precision of the Anchor Influences the Amount of Adjustment , 2008, Psychological science.

[16]  S. Handley,et al.  Anchoring in time estimation. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Steve M. Easterbrook,et al.  Anchoring and adjustment in software estimation , 2005, ESEC/FSE-13.

[18]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Anchors Distort Estimates of Expected Duration , 2005, Psychological reports.

[19]  Dag I. K. Sjøberg,et al.  The impact of customer expectation on software development effort estimates , 2004 .

[20]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  Better sure than safe? Over-confidence in judgement based software development effort prediction intervals , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[21]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effort , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[22]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[23]  F. Strack,et al.  The Semantics of Anchoring , 2001 .

[24]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Sentencing Under Uncertainty: Anchoring Effects in the Courtroom1 , 2001 .

[25]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Implications of Attitude Change Theories for Numerical Anchoring: Anchor Plausibility and the Limits of Anchor Effectiveness , 2001 .

[26]  Terry Connolly,et al.  Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks , 1997 .

[27]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.