Analysis of basic compounds by supercritical fluid chromatography: attempts to improve peak shape and maintain mass spectrometry compatibility.

While neutral and acidic compounds are well separated by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), basic analytes are more challenging to separate and often problems occur with their peak shapes. Two different methods were explored in the present paper to reduce these problems and maintain compatibility with mass spectrometry (MS). Five different, commercially available 2-ethylpyridine (2-EP) stationary phases were tested without a mobile phase additive using 92 pharmaceutical compounds with basic properties. The kinetic performances of the 5 columns were nearly identical, but the peak shapes of the basic drugs were strongly affected by the stationary phase. The PrincetonSFC 2-EP and Zymor Pegasus 2-EP phases clearly outperformed the other stationary phases, with 77% and 69% of the compounds having Gaussian peaks (and asymmetries between 0.8 and 1.4), respectively. Comparatively, the Waters Viridis Silica 2-EP, Waters Viridis BEH 2-EP and ES industries GreenSep 2-EP phases provided only 52%, 44% and 22% of the compounds with Gaussian peaks, respectively. These differences were attributed to the significant dissimilarities in their silica matrix properties. An alternative strategy was also performed with a hybrid silica stationary phase, Viridis BEH, using 20mM ammonium hydroxide in the mobile phase, which was a mixture of CO(2) and MeOH. With these conditions, 81% of the peaks observed for the basic analytes were Gaussian; however, this value dropped to 17% and 10% in the absence of additive and in the presence of 20mM formic acid, respectively. Finally, the use of a hybrid bare silica stationary phase in the presence of 20mM ammonium hydroxide is quite an interesting solution as this system is compatible with both ultra high performance SFC (UHPSFC) columns packed with sub-2 μm particles and with MS detection. The overall applicability of this system was demonstrated with various mixtures of basic drugs.

[1]  J. Veuthey,et al.  Chromatographic behaviour and comparison of column packed with sub-2 microm stationary phases in liquid chromatography. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[2]  Caroline West,et al.  A unified classification of stationary phases for packed column supercritical fluid chromatography. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  Jtf Jos Keurentjes,et al.  Formation of carbamic acid in organic solvents and in supercritical carbon dioxide , 2007 .

[4]  W. Goetzinger,et al.  Ammonia as a preferred additive in chiral and achiral applications of supercritical fluid chromatography for small, drug-like molecules. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  Holger H Fischer,et al.  Reaction monitoring of aliphatic amines in supercritical carbon dioxide by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and implications for supercritical fluid chromatography. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  D. T. Stanton,et al.  Comparison of LC/MS and SFC/MS for screening of a large and diverse library of pharmaceutically relevant compounds. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  E. Lesellier,et al.  Kinetic behaviour in supercritical fluid chromatography with modified mobile phase for 5 μm particle size and varied flow rates. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  D. McCalley,et al.  The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  L. T. Taylor,et al.  Packed column supercritical fluid chromatography of isomeric polypeptide pairs. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  J. F. Deye,et al.  Role of additives in packed column supercritical fluid chromatography: suppression of solute ionization , 1991 .

[11]  R. Stringham,et al.  Memory effect of mobile phase additives in chiral separations on a Chiralpak AD column. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  J. F. Deye,et al.  Effect of Basic Additives on Peak Shapes of Strong Bases Separated by Packed-Column Supercritical Fluid Chromatography , 1991 .

[13]  E. Lesellier,et al.  Overview of the retention in subcritical fluid chromatography with varied polarity stationary phases. , 2008, Journal of separation science.

[14]  T. Berger Demonstration of High Speeds with Low Pressure Drops Using 1.8 μm Particles in SFC , 2010 .

[15]  P. Carrupt,et al.  Characterization of chromatographic supports for the analysis of basic compounds , 2002 .

[16]  Claudio Brunelli,et al.  Pharmaceutical analysis by supercritical fluid chromatography: Optimization of the mobile phase composition on a 2-ethylpyridine column. , 2008, Journal of separation science.

[17]  P. Sandra,et al.  Development of a supercritical fluid chromatography high-resolution separation method suitable for pharmaceuticals using cyanopropyl silica. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[18]  T. Berger Separation of polar solutes by packed column supercritical fluid chromatography , 1997 .

[19]  M. L. de la Puente,et al.  Supercritical fluid chromatography in research laboratories: design, development and implementation of an efficient generic screening for exploiting this technique in the achiral environment. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  D. Schmidt,et al.  The use of ammonium hydroxide as an additive in supercritical fluid chromatography for achiral and chiral separations and purifications of small, basic medicinal molecules. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  A. Cazenave-Gassiot,et al.  Effect of increasing concentration of ammonium acetate as an additive in supercritical fluid chromatography using CO2-methanol mobile phase. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  Larry T. Taylor,et al.  Supercritical fluid chromatography for the 21st century , 2009 .

[23]  T. H. Walter,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of C18 HPLC stationary phases based on ethyl-bridged hybrid organic/inorganic particles. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  J. Vial,et al.  Feasibility of ultra high performance supercritical neat carbon dioxide chromatography at conventional pressures. , 2011, Journal of separation science.