Part and Whole in Pictorial Relief

What are “natural parts” of pictorial reliefs? Intuitively, and suggested by common lore from the visual arts, they are the bulges that stick out toward the observer. Each such bulge contains a (locally) nearest point and is bounded by one or (usually) more curvilinear ruts. The latter meet in “passes” or saddle points. This divides the relief into “natural districts”. From a formal analysis one knows that reliefs can be divided into “hill districts” or “dale districts”, these two “natural” parcellations being fully distinct. We report empirical results that strongly suggest that visual awareness is based on a partition in bulges, which are mutually only weakly connected. Such a notion immediately explains why inverted reliefs or surfaces illuminated from below appear so different as to be mutually not recognizable.

[1]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[2]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Solid shape , 1990 .

[3]  J. T. Enright.  Paradoxical monocular stereopsis and perspective vergence , 1991 .

[4]  J. Maxwell,et al.  On Hills and Dales , 2011 .

[5]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Pictorial surface attitude and local depth comparisons , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Pollack.  A note on monocular depth-perception. , 1955, American Journal of Psychology.

[7]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[8]  A. Hildebrand.  Das Problem der Form in der bildenden Kunst , 1893 .

[9]  William M. Rand,et al.  Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods , 1971 .

[10]  A. Ames,et al.  The Illusion of Depth from Single Pictures , 1925 .

[11]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The shading cue in context , 2010, i-Perception.

[12]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Pointing out of the Picture , 2004, Perception.

[13]  Chris Christou,et al.  Shape Constancy in Pictorial Relief , 1996, Object Representation in Computer Vision.

[14]  Carl Friedrich Gauss.  Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas , 1981 .

[15]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Relief: pictorial and otherwise , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[16]  J. Koenderink.  The All Seeing Eye? , 2014, Perception.

[17]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Pleasures of Ambiguity: the Case of Piranesi’s Carceri , 2013 .

[18]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Perturbation Study of Shading in Pictures , 1996, Perception.

[19]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[21]  Harold Schlosberg,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth from Single Pictures , 1941 .

[22]  C. WILLIAM TYLER,et al.  Depth perception in disparity gratings , 1974, Nature.

[23]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[24]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Awareness of the light field: the case of deformation , 2012, i-Perception.

[25]  J T Todd,et al.  Ambiguity and the ‘Mental Eye’ in Pictorial Relief , 2001, Perception.

[26]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Surface perception in pictures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  D. Hendrick,et al.  Introduction , 1998, Thorax.

[28]  John C. Beatty,et al.  Sculpture , 2002, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[29]  A. Ames.  Depth in Pictorial Art , 1925 .

[30]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On So-Called Paradoxical Monocular Stereoscopy , 1994, Perception.

[31]  H. Hecht,et al.  Looking into pictures : an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space , 2003 .

[32]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The Structure of Relief , 1998 .

[33]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Gauge Fields in Pictorial Space , 2012, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[34]  Leroy D. McDermott.  Self-Representation in Upper Paleolithic Female Figurines , 1996, Current Anthropology.

[35]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Picasso in the mind’s eye of the beholder: Three-dimensional filling-in of ambiguous line drawings , 2012, Cognition.

[36]  A. H. Lloyd.  Grundz?ge der psychologie. , 1901 .

[37]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[38]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Rank order scaling of pictorial depth , 2011, i-Perception.