A randomized trial of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

This study was designed to assess the role of dosage of chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. One hundred thirty-three patients without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomly allocated to receive two different dose levels of cyclophosphamide (C), methotrexate (M), and fluorouracil (F), administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by sites of disease (visceral, bone, or soft-tissue dominant) and by interval from primary surgery to first recurrence. Doses on the higher-dose arm were 600 mg/m2 (C,F) and 40 mg/m2 (M) with escalation if possible; doses on the lower-dose arm were 300 mg/m2 (C,F) and 20 mg/m2 (M) without escalation. Patients who failed to respond to lower-dose CMF were crossed over to the higher-dose arm. Patients randomized to the higher-dose arm had longer survival measured from initiation of chemotherapy (median survival, 15.6 months v 12.8 months, P = .026 by log-rank test), but the effect of dose was of borderline significance (P approximately 0.12) when adjusted for a chance imbalance between the two arms in the time from first relapse to randomization, using the Cox proportional hazards model. Response rates (International Union Against Cancer [UICC] criteria) for patients with measurable disease were higher-dose arm: 16/53 (30%) and lower-dose arm: 6/53 (11%), (P = .03). Only one of 37 patients responded on crossover from the lower- to the higher-dose arm. Patients experienced more vomiting, myelosuppression, conjunctivitis, and alopecia when receiving higher doses of chemotherapy. A series of 34 linear analogue self-assessment scales were used to make detailed quality of life assessments on a subset of 49 patients. These scales confirmed greater toxicity in the immediate posttreatment period, but also a trend to improvement in general health and some disease-related indices, in patients receiving higher-dose chemotherapy. This trial suggests that better palliation is achieved by using full-dose chemotherapy.

[1]  M. Tattersall,et al.  Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Evaluation of high-dose versus standard FAC chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer in protected environment units: a prospective randomized study. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  D. Hayes,et al.  New agents and new medical treatments for advanced breast cancer. , 1987, Seminars in oncology.

[4]  W. Lane,et al.  A randomized study of intensive versus moderate chemotherapy programs in metastatic breast cancer , 1987, Cancer.

[5]  I. Tannock,et al.  Problems Associated with the Assessment of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Can Past Experience Teach us to do Better Clinical Trials? , 1987 .

[6]  R. Livingston,et al.  Aggressive adriamycin‐containing regimen (PM‐FAC) in estrogen receptor‐negative disseminated breast cancer. Results of a southwest oncology group trial , 1985, Cancer.

[7]  I. Tannock,et al.  Quality of life measurement in breast cancer patients. , 1985, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  W. Hryniuk,et al.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  I. Tannock,et al.  Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J H Goldie,et al.  The genetic origin of drug resistance in neoplasms: implications for systemic therapy. , 1984, Cancer research.

[11]  N. Boyd,et al.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. , 1984, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  J. Breau,et al.  High‐dose cyclophosphamide and high‐dose 5‐fluorouracil: A new first‐line regimen for advanced breast cancer , 1984, Cancer.

[13]  R. McCorkle,et al.  Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening disease. , 1983, Social science & medicine.

[14]  R. Gelman,et al.  Prolonged disease-free survival in advanced breast cancer treated with "super-CMF" adriamycin: an alternating regimen employing high-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue. , 1981, Cancer treatment reports.

[15]  P. Engstrom,et al.  Low dose chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, 5‐fluorouracil (CAMF) versus sequential cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5‐fluorouracil (CMF) and adriamycin , 1979, Cancer.

[16]  S. Pocock,et al.  Combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Prospective comparison of multiple drug therapy with L‐phenylalanine mustard , 1976, Cancer.

[17]  P. Engstrom,et al.  An effective low‐dose intermittent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5‐fluorouracil treatment regimen for metastatic breast cancer , 1975, Cancer.

[18]  M. Lorr,et al.  Manual for the Profile of Mood States , 1971 .