Data-driven Aerodynamic Analysis of Structures using Gaussian Processes

An abundant amount of data gathered during wind tunnel testing and health monitoring of structures inspires the use of machine learning methods to replicate the wind forces. These forces are critical for both the design and life-cycle assessment of lifeline structures such as bridges. This paper presents a data-driven Gaussian Process-Nonlinear Finite Impulse Response (GP-NFIR) model of the nonlinear self-excited forces acting on bridges. Constructed in a nondimensional form, the model takes the effective wind angle of attack as lagged exogenous input and outputs a probability distribution of the aerodynamic forces. The nonlinear latent function, mapping the input to the output, is modeled by a GP regression. Consequently, the model is nonparametric, and as such, it avoids setting up the latent function’s structure a priori. The training input is designed as band-limited random harmonic motion that consists of vertical and rotational displacements. Once trained, the model can predict the aerodynamic forces for both prescribed input motion and coupled aeroelastic analysis. The presented concept is first verified for a flat plate’s analytical, linear solution by predicting the self-excited forces and flutter velocity. Finally, the framework is applied to a streamlined and bluff bridge deck based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) data. Here, the model’s ability to predict nonlinear aerodynamic forces, critical flutter limit, and post-flutter behavior are highlighted. Further applications of the presented framework are foreseen in the design and online real-time monitoring of slender line-like structures.

[1]  T. Argentini,et al.  An experimental validation of a band superposition model of the aerodynamic forces acting on multi-box deck sections , 2013 .

[2]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Comparison Metrics for Time-Histories: Application to Bridge Aerodynamics , 2020 .

[3]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[4]  Yaojun Ge,et al.  Computational models and methods for aerodynamic flutter of long-span bridges , 2008 .

[5]  A G Davenport,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF SLENDER, LINE-LIKE STRUCTURES TO A GUSTY WIND. , 1962 .

[6]  Zhao Liu,et al.  Nonlinear unsteady bridge aerodynamics: Reduced-order modeling based on deep LSTM networks , 2020 .

[7]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Manifold Gaussian Processes for regression , 2014, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[8]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  Prediction of aeroelastic response of bridge decks using artificial neural networks , 2020 .

[9]  M. Cid Montoya,et al.  CFD-based aeroelastic characterization of streamlined bridge deck cross-sections subject to shape modifications using surrogate models , 2018, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[10]  A Damsgaard,et al.  WIND TUNNEL TESTS FOR THE GREAT BELT LINK , 1992 .

[11]  Šarkić Anina,et al.  Numerical simulations and experimental validations of force coefficients and flutter derivatives of a bridge deck , 2015 .

[12]  Allan Larsen,et al.  Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt , 1993 .

[13]  Allan Larsen,et al.  Discrete vortex simulation of flow around five generic bridge deck sections , 1998 .

[14]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[15]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Integrated pre-processing for Bayesian nonlinear system identification with Gaussian processes , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  David Duvenaud,et al.  Automatic model construction with Gaussian processes , 2014 .

[17]  Allan Larsen,et al.  COMPUTER SIMULATION OF WIND-STRUCTURE INTERACTION IN BRIDGE AERODYNAMICS , 1998 .

[18]  T. Argentini,et al.  Determination of complex aerodynamic admittance of bridge decks under deterministic gusts using the Vortex Particle Method , 2019, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[19]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  Methods for flutter stability analysis of long-span bridges: a review , 2017 .

[20]  Andrea Collina,et al.  Turbulence effect on flutter velocity in long span suspended bridges , 1993 .

[21]  Jaehoon Lee,et al.  Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processes , 2017, ICLR.

[22]  Paul R. White,et al.  The interpretation of the bispectra of vibration signals—: I. Theory , 1995 .

[23]  Juš Kocijan,et al.  Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems Using Gaussian Process Models , 2015 .

[24]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A comparative study of numerical methods for fluid structure interaction analysis in long-span bridge design , 2002 .

[25]  C. Scruton,et al.  Wind Effects on Structures , 1970 .

[26]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Nonlinear System Identification: A User-Oriented Road Map , 2019, IEEE Control Systems.

[27]  G Morgenthal,et al.  A categorical perspective towards aerodynamic models for aeroelastic analyses of bridge decks , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[28]  Pier Marzocca,et al.  Indicial functions in the aeroelasticity of bridge decks , 2014 .

[29]  F. Nieto,et al.  Bridge deck flutter derivatives: Efficient numerical evaluation exploiting their interdependence , 2015 .

[30]  R. T. Jones The unsteady lift of a wing of finite aspect ratio , 1940 .

[31]  G. Morgenthal,et al.  Aeroelastic analyses of bridges using a Pseudo-3D vortex method and velocity-based synthetic turbulence generation , 2018, Engineering structures.

[32]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[33]  A. Kareem,et al.  Wind-induced effects on bluff bodies in turbulent flows: Nonstationary, non-Gaussian and nonlinear features , 2013 .

[34]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  A nonlinear analysis framework for bluff-body aerodynamics: A Volterra representation of the solution of Navier-Stokes equations , 2015 .

[35]  A. Kareem,et al.  AERODYNAMIC COUPLING EFFECTS ON FLUTTER AND BUFFETING OF BRIDGES , 2000 .

[36]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks , 1995 .

[37]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  Parallels between wind and crowd loading of bridges , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[38]  Radford M. Neal Priors for Infinite Networks , 1996 .

[39]  G. Morgenthal,et al.  A synergistic study of a CFD and semi-analytical models for aeroelastic analysis of bridges in turbulent wind conditions , 2018, Journal of Fluids and Structures.

[40]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[41]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Aeroelastic Analysis of Cable‐Stayed Bridges , 1990 .

[42]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  An immersed interface method for the vortex-in-cell algorithm , 2007 .

[43]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A GPU-accelerated pseudo-3D vortex method for aerodynamic analysis , 2014 .

[44]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Modeling hysteretic nonlinear behavior of bridge aerodynamics via cellular automata nested neural network , 2011 .

[45]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Data-Efficient Learning in Robotics and Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[46]  Temple F. Smith Occam's razor , 1980, Nature.

[47]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Aerodynamic Models for Buffeting and Flutter of Long-Span Bridges , 2017 .

[48]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: a unified overview , 1995, Autom..

[49]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[50]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  The action of flexible bridges under wind, I: Flutter theory† , 1978 .

[51]  Iain Murray,et al.  Introduction to Gaussian Processes , 2008 .