Reducing roughness in extreme ultraviolet lithography

Pattern roughness is a major problem in advanced lithography for semiconductor manufacturing, especially for the insertion of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography as proposed in the coming years. Current approaches to roughness reduction have not yielded the desired results. Here, a new global optimization approach is proposed, taking advantage of the different strengths and weaknesses of lithography and etch. Lithography should focus on low-frequency roughness by minimizing both the low-frequency power spectral density and the correlation length. Etch should focus on high frequency roughness by growing the correlation length. By making unbiased measurements of the roughness, including the power spectral density, the parameters needed to guide these optimization efforts become available. The old approach, of individually seeking to reduce the 3σ roughness of pre- and post-etch features, is unlikely to lead to the required progress in overall roughness reduction for EUV.

[1]  Chris A. Mack Understanding the efficacy of linewidth roughness postprocessing , 2015 .

[2]  Chris A. Mack Analytical expression for impact of linewidth roughness on critical dimension uniformity , 2014 .

[3]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Setting up a proper power spectral density (PSD) and autocorrelation analysis for material and process characterization , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Systematic errors in the measurement of power spectral density , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Chris A. Mack Stochastic modeling in lithography: the use of dynamical scaling in photoresist development , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Global minimization line-edge roughness analysis of top down SEM images , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Warren Montgomery,et al.  Benchmarking study of EUV resists for NXE:3300B , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Reducing roughness in extreme ultraviolet lithography , 2018, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS.

[9]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Defining and measuring development rates for a stochastic resist: a simulation study , 2013 .

[10]  Chris A. Mack Stochastic modeling in lithography: use of dynamical scaling in photoresist development , 2009 .

[11]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Influence of metrology error in measurement of line edge roughness power spectral density , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Sophia Wang,et al.  Practical and bias-free LWR measurement by CDSEM , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Gijsbert Rispens,et al.  Contrast optimization for 0.33NA EUV lithography , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  James W. Thackeray,et al.  Roughness power spectral density as a function of resist parameters and its impact through process , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Gijsbert Rispens,et al.  Impact of acid statistics on EUV local critical dimension uniformity , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Atsuko Yamaguchi,et al.  Single-shot method for bias-free LER/LWR evaluation with little damage , 2007 .

[17]  Palasantzas,et al.  Roughness spectrum and surface width of self-affine fractal surfaces via the K-correlation model. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  Gregg M. Gallatin Resist blur and line edge roughness (Invited Paper) , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Ultrahigh efficiency EUV contact-hole printing with chromeless phase shift mask , 2016, Photomask Japan.

[20]  C. Mack Fundamental principles of optical lithography , 2007 .

[21]  Peter De Bisschop,et al.  Stochastic effects in EUV lithography: random, local CD variability, and printing failures , 2017 .

[22]  Chris A. Mack Line-edge roughness and the ultimate limits of lithography , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[23]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Improvements to the analytical linescan model for SEM metrology , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Analytical linescan model for SEM metrology , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[25]  Adam R. Pawloski,et al.  The effects of chemical gradients and photoresist composition on lithographically generated line edge roughness , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[26]  Trey Graves,et al.  Mechanistic simulation of line-edge roughness , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[27]  Martha I. Sanchez,et al.  Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXI , 2017 .

[28]  Atsuko Yamaguchi,et al.  Bias-free measurement of LER/LWR with low damage by CD-SEM , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[29]  Chris A. Mack Understanding the efficacy of linewidth roughness post-processing , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[30]  J. S. Villarrubia,et al.  Unbiased estimation of linewidth roughness , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[31]  Andrew R. Neureuther,et al.  Reduction in x‐ray lithography shot noise exposure limit by dissolution phenomena , 1988 .

[32]  Chris A. Mack Stochastic modeling of photoresist development in two and three dimensions , 2010 .

[33]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Reaction-diffusion power spectral density , 2012 .

[34]  Steven G. Hansen,et al.  Photoresist and stochastic modeling , 2018 .

[35]  Benjamin Bunday,et al.  Bias reduction in roughness measurement through SEM noise removal , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[36]  Chris A. Mack,et al.  Using the analytical linescan model for SEM metrology , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[37]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Spectral analysis of line width roughness and its application to immersion lithography , 2006 .

[38]  Chris A. Mack Stochastic modeling in lithography: autocorrelation behavior of catalytic reaction-diffusion systems , 2009, Advanced Lithography.