Numerical comparison of techniques for estimating Doppler velocity time series from coherent sea surface scattering measurements

A number of techniques for estimating the Doppler velocity time series from coherent sea surface scattering measurements are compared by observing their behaviour with computer simulated signals. These techniques include the finite difference instantaneous frequency estimator, the covariance moment estimation technique, tracking the peak of the short-time Fourier transform and tracking the peak of the cross Wigner–Ville time–frequency distribution. This comparison is achieved by examining the ability of each technique to track the instantaneous frequency of a unity amplitude, sinusoidal frequency law, complex exponential signal embedded in white Gaussian noise. The response of the estimators to various signal conditions, including low signal-to-noise ratios, high Doppler frequency excursions and high modulation frequencies, is investigated. Using the results, consideration is given to the suitability of each technique for estimating the magnitude, phase and power spectrum of the Doppler velocity time series. These are fundamental quantities required for studying sea surface scattering mechanisms and remotely sensing oceanographic properties.

[1]  G. Valenzuela Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves — A review , 1978 .

[2]  N. Ebuchi,et al.  Physical processes of microwave backscattering from laboratory wind wave surfaces , 1993 .

[3]  Kenneth S. Miller,et al.  A covariance approach to spectral moment estimation , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Microwave radar measurements of ocean wave propagation —Initial results , 1990 .

[5]  David McLaughlin,et al.  Dual-polarized Doppler radar measurements of oceanic fronts , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  David J. McLaughlin,et al.  High resolution polarimetric radar scattering measurements of low grazing angle sea clutter , 1995 .

[7]  William J. Plant,et al.  Evidence of Bragg scattering in microwave Doppler spectra of sea return , 1990 .

[8]  V. V. Pustovoytenko,et al.  On polarization features of radio signals scattered from the sea surface at small grazing angles , 1976 .

[9]  E. M. Poulter,et al.  Doppler radar measurements of wave groups and breaking waves , 1996 .

[10]  W. P. Robins,et al.  Phase Noise in Signal Sources , 1984 .

[11]  William J. Plant,et al.  Parametric dependence of ocean wave-radar modulation transfer functions , 1983 .

[12]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[13]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal. II. A/lgorithms and applications , 1992, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  William J. Plant,et al.  Microwave probing of shallow water bottom topography in the Nantucket Shoals , 1985 .

[15]  Anatol D. Rozenberg,et al.  Laboratory study of polarized microwave scattering by surface waves at grazing incidence: the influence of long waves , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Mingui Sun,et al.  Discrete-time instantaneous frequency and its computation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  Umberto Spagnolini,et al.  2-D phase unwrapping and instantaneous frequency estimation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Robert E. McIntosh,et al.  Observed wavenumber‐frequency properties of microwave backscatter from the ocean surface at near‐grazing angles , 1996 .

[19]  Andrew T. Jessup,et al.  Breaking waves affecting microwave backscatter: 1. Detection and verification , 1991 .