Expectation-based Comprehension: Modeling the Interaction of World Knowledge and Linguistic Experience
暂无分享,去创建一个
Matthew W. Crocker | Noortje Venhuizen | Harm Brouwer | Noortje J. Venhuizen | M. Crocker | Harm Brouwer
[1] John T. Hale,et al. What a Rational Parser Would Do , 2011, Cogn. Sci..
[2] P. Hagoort,et al. The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400 , 2007, Brain Research.
[3] E. Gibson. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .
[4] P. Johnson-Laird,et al. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .
[5] D. Rumelhart. NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .
[6] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. A Model of Event Knowledge , 2019, CogSci.
[7] Colin M. Brown,et al. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[8] John C J Hoeks,et al. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[9] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[10] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.
[11] Mathieu Koppen,et al. Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension , 2003, Cogn. Sci..
[12] T. Landauer,et al. A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .
[13] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. Sentence Comprehension as Mental Simulation: An Information-Theoretic Perspective , 2011, Inf..
[14] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[15] Murray Singer,et al. Exploring Individual Differences in Language Validation , 2014 .
[16] Simon Garrod,et al. The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .
[17] John R. Anderson. The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .
[18] I. Rooij,et al. Connectionist semantic systematicity , 2009, Cognition.
[19] Walter Kintsch,et al. Predication , 2001, Cogn. Sci..
[20] Colin M. Brown,et al. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[21] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..
[22] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing , 2016, Cognitive science.
[23] Walter Kintsch,et al. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .
[24] M. Crocker,et al. On the Proper Treatment of the N400 and P600 in Language Comprehension , 2017, Front. Psychol..
[25] Tobias Richter,et al. Does Validation During Language Comprehension Depend on an Evaluative Mindset? , 2014 .
[26] T. Trabasso,et al. Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. , 1999 .
[27] G. McKoon,et al. The readiness is all: The functionality of memory‐based text processing , 1998 .
[28] Katherine A. DeLong,et al. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[29] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events , 2005, Cognition.
[30] John Hale,et al. Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[31] Ellen F. Lau,et al. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[32] Roger Levy,et al. Cloze but no cigar: The complex relationship between cloze, corpus, and subjective probabilities in language processing , 2011, CogSci.
[33] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] Edward J. O'Brien,et al. Knowledge Activation, Integration, and Validation During Narrative Text Comprehension , 2014 .
[35] Jason E. Albrecht,et al. Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[36] Murray Singer,et al. Verification of Text Ideas during Reading. , 2006 .
[37] D. Plaut,et al. A neurally plausible Parallel Distributed Processing model of Event-Related Potential word reading data , 2012, Brain and Language.
[38] Roger C. Schank,et al. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .
[39] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[40] Thomas F Münte,et al. Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published July 21, 2007 Visual Scenes Trigger Immediate Syntactic Reanalysis: Evidence from ERPs during Situated Spoken Comprehension , 2022 .
[41] Marcus Nyström,et al. Semantic override of low-level features in image viewing - both initially and overall , 2008 .
[42] Hartmut Fitz,et al. Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.
[43] Marte Otten,et al. Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .
[44] David J. Hess,et al. Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension , 1995 .
[45] Van Berkum,et al. The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review , 2009 .
[46] S. Frank,et al. The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences , 2015, Brain and Language.
[47] Brian Roark,et al. Deriving lexical and syntactic expectation-based measures for psycholinguistic modeling via incremental top-down parsing , 2009, EMNLP.
[48] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[49] Johan Bos,et al. The Groningen Meaning Bank , 2013, JSSP.
[50] David L. Davidson,et al. The Logical Form of Action Sentences , 2001 .
[51] Jason E. Albrecht,et al. Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence , 1993 .
[52] Ellen F. Lau,et al. Comprehenders Rationally Adapt Semantic Predictions to the Statistics of the Local Environment: a Bayesian Model of Trial-by-Trial N400 Amplitudes , 2017, CogSci.
[53] D. Bobrow,et al. Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science , 1975 .
[54] Mark F. St. John,et al. The Story Gestalt: A Model of Knowledge-Intensive Processes in Text Comprehension , 1992, Cogn. Sci..
[55] R. Ratcliff,et al. A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.
[56] James L. McClelland,et al. Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension , 1990, Artif. Intell..
[57] Marshall R. Mayberry,et al. Situated sentence processing: The coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model , 2010, Brain and Language.
[58] J. Elman,et al. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[59] David E. Rumelhart,et al. Toward an interactive model of reading. , 1994 .
[60] Terence Parsons,et al. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics , 1990 .
[61] P. Gordon,et al. The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[62] W. Kintsch. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.
[63] John Hoeks,et al. Modeling the Noun Phrase versus Sentence Coordination Ambiguity in Dutch: Evidence from Surprisal Theory , 2010, CMCL@ACL.
[64] Murray Singer,et al. Validation in Reading Comprehension , 2013 .
[65] John C. J. Hoeks,et al. A time and place for language comprehension: mapping the N400 and the P600 to a minimal cortical network , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[66] Steven A. Hillyard,et al. Word Expectancy and Event-Related Brain Potentials During Sentence Processing , 2019, Preparatory States & Processes.
[67] Martin Paczynski,et al. Establishing Causal Coherence across Sentences: An ERP Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[68] Edward J. O'Brien,et al. Coherence Threshold and the Continuity of Processing: The RI-Val Model of Comprehension , 2016 .
[69] M. Crocker,et al. Teasing apart coercion and surprisal: Evidence from eye-movements and ERPs , 2017, Cognition.
[70] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.
[71] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[72] Richard M. Golden,et al. A parallel distributed processing model of story comprehension and recall , 1993 .
[73] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[74] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[75] W. Kintsch,et al. Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .
[76] M. Crocker,et al. On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation , 2017, Memory & Cognition.
[77] Richard J. Gerrig,et al. The Scope of Memory-Based Processing , 2005 .
[78] Wietske Vonk,et al. World Knowledge in Computational Models of Discourse Comprehension , 2007 .
[79] Tobias Richter,et al. Validation and Comprehension of Text Information: Two Sides of the Same Coin , 2015 .
[80] P. Hagoort,et al. Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2004, Science.
[81] Nathaniel J. Smith,et al. Optimal Processing Times in Reading: A Formal Model and Empirical Investigation , 2008 .
[82] Frank Keller,et al. Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.
[83] Stefan L. Frank,et al. Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processing , 2009 .
[84] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge , 2004 .
[85] Harm Brouwer,et al. The electrophysiology of language comprehension A neurocomputational model , 2010 .
[86] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[87] Van Berkum,et al. The electrophysiology of discourse and conversation , 2012 .
[88] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[89] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.
[90] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[91] David C. Plaut,et al. A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production , 2002 .
[92] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Accessing the discourse representation during reading , 1998 .
[93] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.
[94] Colin M. Brown,et al. Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.