Universal 3D Wearable Fingerprint Targets: Advancing Fingerprint Reader Evaluations

We present the design and manufacturing of high-fidelity universal 3D fingerprint targets, which can be imaged on a variety of fingerprint sensing technologies, namely, capacitive, contact optical, and contactless optical. Universal 3D fingerprint targets enable, for the first time, not only a repeatable and controlled evaluation of fingerprint readers but also the ability to conduct fingerprint reader interoperability studies. Fingerprint reader interoperability refers to how robust fingerprint recognition systems are to variations in the images acquired by different types of fingerprint readers. To build universal 3D fingerprint targets, we adopt a molding and casting framework consisting of: 1) digital mapping of fingerprint images to a negative mold; 2) CAD modeling a scaffolding system to hold the negative mold; 3) fabricating the mold and scaffolding system with a high resolution 3D printer; 4) producing or mixing a material with similar electrical, optical, and mechanical properties to that of the human finger; and 5) fabricating a 3D fingerprint target using controlled casting. Our experiments conducted with personal identity verification and Appendix F certified optical (contact and contactless) and capacitive fingerprint readers demonstrate the usefulness of universal 3D fingerprint targets for controlled and repeatable fingerprint reader evaluations and also fingerprint reader interoperability studies.

[1]  Rayner M. Mayer,et al.  Testing and standards , 1993 .

[2]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition , 2005, Springer Professional Computing.

[3]  J. D. Munck,et al.  The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[4]  Ajit Khosla,et al.  Nanoparticle-doped Electrically-conducting Polymers for Flexible Nano-Micro Systems , 2012 .

[5]  Arun Ross,et al.  A Thin-Plate Spline Calibration Model For Fingerprint Sensor Interoperability , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[6]  David W. Allen,et al.  Spectral reflectance variability of skin and attributing factors , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[7]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  3D Whole Hand Targets: Evaluating Slap and Contactless Fingerprint Readers , 2016, 2016 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG).

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Gold Fingers: 3D Targets for Evaluating Capacitive Readers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[9]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithm and Performance Evaluation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Rex Black,et al.  Managing the Testing Process: Practical Tools and Techniques for Managing Hardware and Software Testing , 2009 .

[11]  Craig I. Watson,et al.  Fingerprint Vendor Technology Evaluation , 2014 .

[12]  Stephen J. Elliott,et al.  Statistical analysis of fingerprint sensor interoperability performance , 2009, 2009 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems.

[13]  V. Falanga,et al.  Use of a durometer to assess skin hardness. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Design and Fabrication of 3D Fingerprint Targets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[15]  Arun Ross,et al.  Biometric Sensor Interoperability: A Case Study in Fingerprints , 2004, ECCV Workshop BioAW.

[16]  R Marks,et al.  Evaluation of biomechanical properties of human skin. , 1995, Clinics in dermatology.