"Flow valve" microfluidic devices for simple, detectorless, and label-free analyte quantitation.

Simplified analysis systems that offer the performance of benchtop instruments but the convenience of portability are highly desirable. We have developed novel, miniature devices that feature visual inspection readout of a target's concentration from a ~1 μL volume of solution introduced into a microfluidic channel. Microchannels are constructed within an elastomeric material, and channel surfaces are coated with receptors to the target. When a solution is flowed into the channel, the target cross-links multiple receptors on the surface, resulting in constriction of the first few millimeters of the channel and stopping of flow. Quantitation is performed by measuring the distance traveled by the target solution in the channel before flow stops. A key advantage of our approach is that quantitation is accomplished by simple visual inspection of the channel, without the need for complex detection instrumentation. We have tested these devices using the model system of biotin as a receptor and streptavidin as the target. We have also characterized three factors that influence flow distance: solution viscosity, device thickness, and channel height. We found that solution capillary flow distance scales with the negative logarithm of target concentration and have detected streptavidin concentrations as low as 1 ng/mL. Finally, we have identified and evaluated a plausible mechanism wherein time-dependent channel constriction in the first few millimeters leads to concentration-dependent flow distances. Their simplicity coupled with performance makes these "flow valve" systems especially attractive for a host of analysis applications.

[1]  J. Jorgenson Capillary liquid chromatography at ultrahigh pressures. , 2010, Annual review of analytical chemistry.

[2]  J P Landry,et al.  Macromolecular scaffolds for immobilizing small molecule microarrays in label-free detection of protein-ligand interactions on solid support. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  H. Gaub,et al.  Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. , 1994, Science.

[4]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[5]  William J. Griffiths,et al.  Mass spectrometry: from proteomics to metabolomics and lipidomics. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[6]  R. Cooks,et al.  Orbitrap mass spectrometry: instrumentation, ion motion and applications. , 2008, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[7]  F. Švec Porous polymer monoliths: amazingly wide variety of techniques enabling their preparation. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry in proteomics. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[9]  Jonathan V Sweedler,et al.  Label-free quantitation of peptide release from neurons in a microfluidic device with mass spectrometry imaging. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[10]  Guozhen Fang,et al.  Applications and recent developments of multi-analyte simultaneous analysis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. , 2011, Journal of immunological methods.

[11]  M C Davies,et al.  Detection of antigen-antibody binding events with the atomic force microscope. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[12]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Discrimination of DNA hybridization using chemical force microscopy. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Y. Harada,et al.  Specific and Quantized Antigen−Antibody Interaction Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[15]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre- sized probes in chemistry and biology , 1998, Nature.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Stretching and breaking duplex DNA by chemical force microscopy. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.

[18]  F. Fernández,et al.  Ambient sampling/ionization mass spectrometry: applications and current trends. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Milton L. Lee,et al.  Biocompatible polymeric monoliths for protein and peptide separations. , 2009, Journal of separation science.

[20]  M. L. Sheely,et al.  Glycerol Viscosity Tables , 1932 .

[21]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Antigen binding forces of individually addressed single-chain Fv antibody molecules. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Hawkins,et al.  Integrated hollow waveguides with arch-shaped cores , 2006, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[23]  Sandeep Kumar Vashist,et al.  Technology behind commercial devices for blood glucose monitoring in diabetes management: a review. , 2011, Analytica chimica acta.

[24]  J. Marshall,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and certainty of results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter , 2008, Current medical research and opinion.

[25]  R. Crooks,et al.  Three-dimensional paper microfluidic devices assembled using the principles of origami. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  W. Dungchai,et al.  A low-cost, simple, and rapid fabrication method for paper-based microfluidics using wax screen-printing. , 2011, The Analyst.